Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Blocks Patriot Act Legislation
Los Angeles Times ^ | 12/16/2005 | Richard B. Schmitt

Posted on 12/16/2005 2:25:18 PM PST by SirLinksalot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: noah

Looks like the Democrats REALLY want us to LOSE the war on terror and a few Republicans have given them COVER.
-----
The citizens of this country are in real trouble. We have a so-called Washington government that has the first and foremost duty to protect the people of this country. Yet they will not close our borders, in fact, work hard to keep them open and now this gross travesty and atrocity.

I guess it is going to take a major terrorist catastrophe, of massive proportion to wake up the people of this country and finally rise up against the political class in Washington and again gain control of their country through representatives who CARE ABOUT AMERICA. Right now, we are in serious jeapordy.


21 posted on 12/16/2005 2:47:33 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: inquest
Otherwise, they will bear an equal share of the blame for the act's failure to be renewed.

There's a game of brinksmanship going on. The proponents of the conference report version have options too - for example the 3 month extension in S.2082, which is not contentious at all. Frist asserts that a 3 month extension is unacceptable, so won't bring it up for debate or vote even though he can. Frist asserts thatteh President, given a choice between a 3 month extension and sunset, would choose sunset.

22 posted on 12/16/2005 2:49:13 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

It is all part of Johnny McCain's Al Qaeda Bill of Rights. We've definitely been too rough on the terrorists. You know. The panties on the head torture and all that jazz.


23 posted on 12/16/2005 2:51:52 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (We did not lose in Vietnam. We left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
Frist asserts thatteh President, given a choice between a 3 month extension and sunset, would choose sunset.

Supremely ironic, given how the opponents of the President are often the ones accused of being unappeasable.

24 posted on 12/16/2005 2:51:54 PM PST by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
Honestly folks, how many ordinary American rights have been violated as a result of the Patriot Act ?

We have no way of knowing. Secret "John Doe", unspecific, and unsigned warrants. That's the point.

How many people's library borrowing habits have been spied upon ?

We don't know. How many? As many as the government wants to, that's how many. How can we find out? We can't.

That's the point.

25 posted on 12/16/2005 2:53:15 PM PST by wyattearp (The best weapon to have in a gunfight is a shotgun - preferably from ambush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pleikumud
Or maybe they don't care about security at all?

If the Patriot Act was about security, it would emphasize securing our southern border. However, the southern border is not even mentioned in the PA. The only border that is mentioned is our northern border.

It is not about security. It is about power, and control.

26 posted on 12/16/2005 2:55:10 PM PST by wyattearp (The best weapon to have in a gunfight is a shotgun - preferably from ambush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
GOP Majority "LEADER" Bill Frist: NAY

Trent Lott was William Wallace compared to Frist.

27 posted on 12/16/2005 3:00:20 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

Since I am not an American, I wonder if someone can explain what tools does the Patriot Act offer to protect the state from terrorism, and how do others feel it is unconstitutional?

It has something to do with conducting surveillance without a warrant, correct? If that’s the case I don’t see how that is a big deal. Since most judges are liberals, what judge will allow the FBI to use surveillance outside or inside of mosques and/or CAIR functions?


28 posted on 12/16/2005 3:02:37 PM PST by Sam Gamgee (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wyattearp

"Or maybe they don't care about security at all?"


Now the Dems want Bush to break the law by gathering intelligence as if it were still in effect, and then use that to impeach Bush.

The Dims cannot beat Bush at the polls, so now they will try and use the judiciary to get rid of President Bush.


29 posted on 12/16/2005 3:02:38 PM PST by Candor7 (Into Liberal Flatulence Goes the Hope of the West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: FRONTLINER
"If Larry Craig voted against renewal , there is good reason for it."

OTOH, if Kennedy, Boxer, and Kerry voted against it as well, Craig's "reasons" aren't good enough.

30 posted on 12/16/2005 3:02:40 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
We ought to ask ourselves if the cost of having this act in place (i.e., greater surviellance) exceeds the benefits ( e.g. more potential terrorist cells busted and captured ).

Good question. But why have virtually open borders, expedited visa proceedures, etc., and then try to shut t-cells down AFTER their here?

Hmmm...

31 posted on 12/16/2005 3:03:10 PM PST by banjo joe (Work the angles. Show all work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter

I read on an earlier post that Frist changed his vote to NAY so that he could bring it up for a vote again.


32 posted on 12/16/2005 3:03:49 PM PST by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

3 repubs is bipartisan for the purpose of this propoganda piece


33 posted on 12/16/2005 3:04:13 PM PST by italianquaker (Democrats and media can't win elections at least they can win their phony polls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
It's time to repeal the 17th Amendment.
34 posted on 12/16/2005 3:04:46 PM PST by manwiththehands ("Have a RamaHanuKwanzMas" - Glenn Beck (And Merry Christmas!) (... and "Happy Holidays!"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Hecks
"I read on an earlier post that Frist changed his vote to NAY so that he could bring it up for a vote again."

Well, based upon a urologist's report on the miniscule size of Frist's gonads, that's not a theory I'd buy.

35 posted on 12/16/2005 3:07:29 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
Now the Dems want Bush to break the law by gathering intelligence as if it were still in effect, and then use that to impeach Bush.

If he does, then they should.

36 posted on 12/16/2005 3:10:39 PM PST by wyattearp (The best weapon to have in a gunfight is a shotgun - preferably from ambush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: italianquaker
3 repubs is bipartisan ...

LOL. It was 4, FWIW. Craig, Hagel, Murkowski and Sununu. Frist also voted NAY, but did so in order to support a motion to reconsider the cloture vote.

The underlying matter, the conference report, lives on regardless of Frist's parliametary maneuver. The Motion to Reconsider allows Senator's to "change" their position vis-a-vis cloture, and if the change of heart comes quickly enough, the voting and debate (overiding the objections of a relcalcitrant 30 Senators) would be slightly faster (one day) than mounting a fresh cloture motion.

37 posted on 12/16/2005 3:11:01 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

So as of today, the Gorelick Wall between intelligence agencies is back up. Just how Clinton wanted it to avoid prosecution. How nice.


38 posted on 12/16/2005 3:14:38 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
Wide open borders and a big hearty welcome wagon out for all illegal alien invaders, narco terrorists, chi coms and other assorted commies,islamo fascists walk ins, and a war on terror are incompatible unless of course you have another agenda...

imo

39 posted on 12/16/2005 3:14:41 PM PST by joesnuffy (A camel once bit my sister-we knew just what to do- gather large rocks & squash her-Mullet Ho'mar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

Has Mineta armed the commercial and cargo airline pilots YET?

Nope still dragging his feet with some higher ups tacit approval...

So many hoops most have given up trying....just as was intended...

imo


40 posted on 12/16/2005 3:16:09 PM PST by joesnuffy (A camel once bit my sister-we knew just what to do- gather large rocks & squash her-Mullet Ho'mar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson