Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US deploys new top fighter jet
Yahoo News ^ | Fri Dec 16, 2005 | Jim Wolf

Posted on 12/16/2005 10:49:35 PM PST by FreeKeys

The futuristic F-22A "Raptor" fighter jet, designed to dominate the skies well into the 21st century, joined the U.S. combat fleet on Thursday, 20 years after it was conceived to fight Soviet MiGs over Europe.

The Air Force said "initial operational capability" had been achieved at the 1st Fighter Wing's 27th Fighter Squadron at Langley Air Force Base, Virginia.

Pilots in the squadron, the Air Force's oldest in continuous operation, have been training on the F-22, the Air Force's most advanced weapon system, for about a year.

"If we go to war tomorrow, the Raptor will go with us," Gen. Ronald Keys, head of the Air Force's Air Combat command, said in a statement. He said an initial group of 12 was ready for combat worldwide or for homeland defense.

The squadron may swing through the Pacific next year, probably flying from Guam and elsewhere, though no decision has been made about where to best "showcase" it, Keys said in a later teleconference with reporters.

With the Soviet Union gone, defense analysts have cast the F-22 as the weapon of choice for any future U.S. conflict with China, for instance over Taiwan.

"There is a clear role for F-22 here," said Daniel Goure, a former Pentagon strategist now at the Lexington Institute, an Arlington, Virginia, research group with close ties to the U.S. defense establishment.

The aircraft's role is to "kick the doors down" in a conflict, as Pentagon officials put it, knocking out defenses on the ground and in the air to clear the way for other warplanes and forces.

The radar-evading Raptor is twice as reliable and three times more effective than the F-15C Eagle it is replacing as the top U.S. air-to-air fighter, according to Lockheed Martin Corp., its developer.

"It's a fighter pilot's dream," said former F-15 pilot Col. Walter Givhan, lauding the plane's integrated avionics, stealth and speed. Givhan is wing commander at Nellis Air Force Base in Nevada, where the latest round of F-22 testing was completed.

Lockheed described the fighter as the world's most advanced and said it was "relevant for the next 40 years."

Boeing Co. and Northrop Grumman Corp. are top F-22 subcontractors. United Technologies Corp.'s Pratt & Whitney unit makes the aircraft's two engines.

STEALTHY AND SUPERSONIC

The Raptor combines low-observability, or stealth, with supersonic speed, agility and cockpit displays designed to boost greatly pilots' awareness of the situation around them.

At a "fly-away" cost of about $130 million each for the most recent batch, not including research and development, it is also one of the most controversial U.S. warplanes ever.

Critics have termed it unaffordable overkill in a world without the potential threat of a Soviet Union able to send swarms of MiGs into a dogfight, which prompted its inception in 1986.

The Air Force is planning to stretch F-22 production until 2010 to keep Lockheed's production line open pending arrival of its more affordable F-35 Joint Strike Fighter family of aircraft that will also go to the Navy, the Marines and co-developing nations that include Britain, Italy and Turkey.

The F-22 also has a ground attack capability to drop 250-pound (113.5-kg), small-diameter bombs or 1,000-pound (454-kg) Joint Direct Attack Munitions while flying at supersonic speeds.

Gen. Michael Moseley, the Air Force chief of staff, has said the F-22 is needed against threats such as Russian-built surface-to-air missiles sold overseas.

Moseley said on Tuesday he hoped to buy 183 F-22s, four more than currently in the budget and enough for seven combat-ready squadrons, down from the 750 F-22s once planned.

Final assembly has been completed on 67 of the 107 F-22s already purchased by the Air Force, Lockheed's program manager, Larry Lawson, said in a statement.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: Virginia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: airforce; airsuperiority; aviation; dominance; f22araptor; fighterjet; langley; langleyafb; lockheedmartin; ownage; pwn4g3; raptor; stateoftheart; superiority; supersupersonic; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
In-freakin'-credible
1 posted on 12/16/2005 10:49:36 PM PST by FreeKeys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys

2 posted on 12/16/2005 10:51:52 PM PST by FreeKeys ("Anybody who doesn't appreciate what America and the President, Bush has done, let them go to hell!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys

Just in time for a nice shake-down sortie to Tehran.


3 posted on 12/16/2005 10:52:38 PM PST by RightOnTheLeftCoast (You're it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightOnTheLeftCoast

Will work against Chinese MIGs I assume.


4 posted on 12/16/2005 10:55:30 PM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys
Critics have termed it unaffordable overkill in a world without the potential threat of a Soviet Union able to send swarms of MiGs into a dogfight, which prompted its inception in 1986.

Of course these same critics wanted the Soviet Union to win the Cold War.

5 posted on 12/16/2005 10:56:01 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey hey ho ho Andy Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys

Awesome fighter.


6 posted on 12/16/2005 10:59:43 PM PST by jerry639
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Of course these same critics wanted the Soviet Union to win the Cold War.

Yeah, and they aren't even satisfied that the order was scaled all the way down to only 183 planes INSTEAD OF THE 750 THAT WERE ORIGNALLY PLANNED!!! Sheeesh!

7 posted on 12/16/2005 11:02:22 PM PST by FreeKeys ("Anybody who doesn't appreciate what America and the President, Bush has done, let them go to hell!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jerry639

I was told it had about the same amount of horsepower as the entire starting grid--of 3 NASCAR races.


8 posted on 12/16/2005 11:02:24 PM PST by phil1750 (Love like you've never been hurt;Dance like nobody's watching;PRAY like it's your last prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys

I bet the flyaway costs would be a lot lower for 750.


9 posted on 12/16/2005 11:04:10 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey hey ho ho Andy Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jerry639
Beauty ... I'd love to see and hear this one


10 posted on 12/16/2005 11:09:46 PM PST by STARWISE (THIS DAY WILL LIVE IN HISTORY! God Bless Pres. George Bush-NEVER FORGET what brought this day.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys

Great vid here....

http://homepage.mac.com/lightningrodpictures/iMovieTheater33.html


11 posted on 12/16/2005 11:11:26 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys

AIM HIGH! I love my US AIR FORCE! Go Raptor! Fly, fight and WIN! Maybe Tehran is in its sights.


12 posted on 12/16/2005 11:11:53 PM PST by goresalooza (Nurses Rock!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys
Kudos to the USAF for keeping a clear vision, despite the detractors.

This is a superb aircraft for tomorrow's Air Battlefield, and a good many on the ground, too.

13 posted on 12/16/2005 11:26:08 PM PST by A Jovial Cad ("If you kill enough of them, they stop fighting." -General Curtis LeMay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys

What an incredible plane. I've got that warm fuzzy feeling. =)


14 posted on 12/16/2005 11:42:57 PM PST by Termite_Commander (Warning: Cynical Right-winger Ahead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

That movie was GRRRRRRRRRRRREAT!!!


15 posted on 12/16/2005 11:43:46 PM PST by Left2Right ("Democracy isn't perfect, but other governments are so much worse")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys

Can the F-22A do Mach 1 in a vertical climb like an F-15 can?


16 posted on 12/16/2005 11:47:44 PM PST by Chewbacca (Not all men are fools. The smart ones are still bachelors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys
Critics have termed it unaffordable overkill in a world without the potential threat of a Soviet Union able to send swarms of MiGs into a dogfight, which prompted its inception in 1986.

Overkill gets the job done.

17 posted on 12/16/2005 11:51:02 PM PST by Paul_Denton (The U.S. should adopt the policy of Oom Shmoom: Israeli policy where no one gives a sh*t about U.N.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Left2Right

I really like this one to.....

http://homepage.mac.com/lightningrodpictures/iMovieTheater9.html


18 posted on 12/16/2005 11:52:51 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

It's not overkill, it's underkill, in terms of numbers. If we commit to a small number of superior ... ahhh ... platforms, aren't we susceptible to being swamped by an overwhelming number of inferior opponents? This is what has always worried me vis a vis China. I always imagine some massive assault on an aircraft carrier, where we simply can't counter every single threat, and one penetration is fatal.


19 posted on 12/17/2005 12:38:49 AM PST by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys

I only wish that the Aussie government would stump up the money and take up the offer to buy the F-22.


20 posted on 12/17/2005 12:39:15 AM PST by Dundee (They gave up all their tomorrows for our today’s.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson