Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Say They Didn't Back Wiretapping
Yahoo (AP) ^ | 12/20/2005 | KATHERINE SHRADER

Posted on 12/20/2005 6:30:32 AM PST by The_Victor

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-160 next last
To: The_Victor

"I feel unable to fully evaluate, much less endorse, these activities,"

Trust your feelings, Jay.

At least Rockefeller is right about that.


101 posted on 12/20/2005 7:29:44 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
Republicans, too, were skeptical.

Since when does Arlen Spector count as Republicans plural? He shouldn't even count as a single-tense Republican.

Such media bias.

102 posted on 12/20/2005 7:30:04 AM PST by Trust but Verify (( ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
BTW, he supposedly had this hidden in his office safe!

There's your leaker.

103 posted on 12/20/2005 7:30:19 AM PST by Ramcat (Thank You American Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: sd-joe
Isn't Graham the nut job that kept a detailed daily diary of everything he did, every day.

I think that was Bob Graham of Florida.

104 posted on 12/20/2005 7:32:08 AM PST by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
"I feel unable to fully evaluate, much less endorse, these activities," West Virginia Sen. Jay Rockefeller, the Senate Intelligence Committee's top Democrat, said in a handwritten letter to Vice President Dick Cheney in July 2003. "As you know, I am neither a technician nor an attorney."

Doesn't sound like the Jaybird is qualified to sit on the intelligence committee

105 posted on 12/20/2005 7:33:02 AM PST by bullseye1911 (If I have to explain it, you'd never understand!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaspar
Rockefeller is the ultimate trust fund baby. An elitist prep school and Ivy Leaguer who hates the military and cowers in the face of fascism, he cannot be depended to defend this country.

He is, in addition, a New York carpet-bagging parasite who has cynically used the good people of West Virginia as no more than a power base - thanks to the West Virginia Democratic machine.

His mug, with its beak, is thoroughly repugnant and eerily reminiscent of Ichabod Crane - may the Headless Horseman return posthaste and gallop again through the Sleepy Hollow(s) of the hills.

106 posted on 12/20/2005 7:33:14 AM PST by mtntop3 ("He who must know before he believes will never come to full knowledge.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
John D. III died in 1978 in an automobile accident. His siblings Abby, Nelson, and Winthrop died at 73, 70, and 60 respectively. Laurance made it to 94, and David is still alive at the age of 90. Nelson's son Michael probably died at the age of 23 (he disappeared in New Guinea in 1961 and was never seen again).

John D. III's wife was Blanchette Ferry Hooker (1909-1992), so you could say that Jay Rockefeller is the son of a Hooker.

107 posted on 12/20/2005 7:33:59 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify
Since when does Arlen Spector count as Republicans plural? He shouldn't even count as a single-tense Republican.

Such media bias.

MSM template:
One "Republican" agreeing with majority of democRATs = bipartisan support.
Several democRATs agreeing with majority Republicans = "mostly" along party lines.

108 posted on 12/20/2005 7:34:09 AM PST by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: gaspar
Rockefeller is the ultimate trust fund baby

He's lucky to have become a baby, given his family's enthusiasm for eugenics and "population control."

109 posted on 12/20/2005 7:36:59 AM PST by syriacus (Murtha wants our troops redeployed. I wonder how he'd feel about redeploying them to Iran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

If I had a little more time on my hands, a little effort with Photoshop could produce all sorts of fun and interesting letters in Jay Rockefeller's own handwriting on US Senate letterhead. For example, perhaps a letter to Osama telling him not to use his cellphone because it is being monitored. Or a memo to Joseph Wilson thanking him for forging the Niger letter. Or a thank you to Saddam with cc: to Kofi for including him in the oil-for-food kickbacks. Where are Dan Rather and Mary Mapes when we need them?


110 posted on 12/20/2005 7:39:56 AM PST by The Electrician ("Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: The Electrician

LOL.......go for it!


111 posted on 12/20/2005 7:40:45 AM PST by Howlin (Defeatism may have its partisan uses, but it is not justified by the facts. - GWB, 12/18/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
My memory is a bit hazy, but was J Rockefeller ever associated with any leaks in the past? This could get real interesting>
112 posted on 12/20/2005 7:42:27 AM PST by cpdiii (roughneck (oil field trash and proud of it), geologist, pilot, pharmacist, full time iconoclast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
What doesn't make sense is that he addressed this to Cheney, exclusive of all others.

If you're on a committee, you just sit there?? You don't ask questions? Your cohorts don't ask questions.

Not only that, his letter in no way addresses what his particular issue is.

One would think therefore that there would be several letters to Cheney about the EXACT same thing.

113 posted on 12/20/2005 7:42:35 AM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: bkepley

dims want us to be attacked. what a shame.


114 posted on 12/20/2005 7:44:21 AM PST by JFC (W, I am with YA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Howlin....Despite the "This is my copy" bit it still doesn't mean that the letter was EVER delivered to Cheney.

Note: July 17, 2003 was three days after Novak's article.

115 posted on 12/20/2005 7:47:22 AM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
A letter from a ranking Senator on the Senate Intelligence Committee must be replied to. Where in the hell is the reply? If it was not replied to the Senator would have raised hell in writing to the Vice President. If it was replied to in closed meetings the minutes of the meeting would show this.

I think Rockefeller is lying.
116 posted on 12/20/2005 7:48:05 AM PST by cpdiii (roughneck (oil field trash and proud of it), geologist, pilot, pharmacist, full time iconoclast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau; Mo1

Oh, there's an interesting fact.


117 posted on 12/20/2005 7:48:20 AM PST by Howlin (Defeatism may have its partisan uses, but it is not justified by the facts. - GWB, 12/18/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Sacajaweau

good catch


118 posted on 12/20/2005 7:50:22 AM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

"The MSM continues to defend the democRATs. But it is interesting to note that after you finish reading past Rockefeller's lies, most of the democRATs admit they recieved the briefings. But of course the MSM will never put that in the first paragraph."

The only sticking point with that argument is that the breifings the Senators recieved in the Intelligence Committee briefings would have been top secret as well, preventing them from talking to even thier staff about it. I still think that this is a dangerous precedent, especially down the line when/if a dem president is elected.


119 posted on 12/20/2005 7:50:27 AM PST by BritExPatInFla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
Some Democrats say they never approved a domestic wiretapping program,..

Based on what I have read, Bush informed them what he was doing; he did not need their approval.

120 posted on 12/20/2005 7:51:53 AM PST by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson