Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/21/2005 3:09:04 AM PST by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: HAL9000

The MSM will have a field day with this one.


2 posted on 12/21/2005 3:12:08 AM PST by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Robertson, who was appointed to the federal bench in Washington by President Bill Clinton in 1994....

In case anyone was wondering.

4 posted on 12/21/2005 3:15:15 AM PST by Bahbah (Free Scooter; Tony Schaffer for the US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000

This makes absolutely no sense at all. The court was notified of the wiretaps. This article makes it sound as if this judge knew about it, had no problem with it, but decided to resign after the NYT ran it.


5 posted on 12/21/2005 3:16:19 AM PST by GOPyouth (De Oppresso Liber! The Tyrant is captured!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Proper headline:

Hack-judge obeys DNC and quits-in-protest

6 posted on 12/21/2005 3:16:55 AM PST by johnny7 (“Check out the big brain on Brett!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Hey, I have no problem with some liberal judge, appointed by Clinton, quiting as long as he keeps his mouth shut about national security issues when he is not longer a federal employee.

I do have a question that maybe someone here can answer.

I keep hearing the dimwitocrats belly aching that the President shouldn't overstep getting a wiretap authorized from a judge because he has up 72 hours after wards to get a judges permission.

My question is, what happens if they go ahead and wire tap someone and then the judge says no, what then?

Doesn't this in effect ultimately give a freaking judge the final say over our national security?
9 posted on 12/21/2005 3:25:28 AM PST by MagnoliaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000; Congressman Billybob

Meaningless, UNTIL you know his politics, who first appointed (er, annointed) him to the judiciary, and who he donates to.

In Washington today, "ALL politics is Party politics" ....


12 posted on 12/21/2005 3:33:52 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000

This is the same judge who has fought the Bush Administration every step in the WOT. The same judge who dismissed charges against Web Hubbell, his wife and other Clintonistas. This judge is the worst kind of political hack.
-----
November 08, 2004
Federal District Judge James Robertson ruled today that the Guantanamo military tribunals are illegal as constituted.
-----
U.S. District Judge James Robertson ruled that the New Buffalo area where the tribe intends to build its casino will not sustain significant negative environmental or social impact due to the development as claimed by Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos.
------
WASHINGTON (AllPolitics, July 1) -- A federal judge dismissed tax evasion charges against former Justice Department official and presidential friend Webster Hubbell, calling the indictment brought by Independent Counsel Ken Starr "the quintessential fishing expedition."
-------
11:00 AM Aug. 02, 2000 PT The FBI must respond to privacy activists' request for information about the Carnivore email surveillance system. In a hearing late Wednesday,
-------
U.S. District Judge James Robertson's decision is "a major rebuke to federal agencies charged with protecting imperiled wildlife," said the National Wildlife Federation, which sued the service and the Corps over Florida Rock's plans to mine for limestone on 5,200 acres near Ft. Myers, Fla.
-----
Just a short list of this judge's decisions.


14 posted on 12/21/2005 3:37:34 AM PST by stocksthatgoup ("It's inexcusable to tell us to 'connect the dots' and not give us the tools to do so." G W Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
U.S. District Judge James Robertson, one of 11 members of the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, sent a letter to Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. late Monday notifying him of his resignation without providing an explanation.

This article is using third person speculation to prove their premise.

15 posted on 12/21/2005 3:39:27 AM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Das leck!
16 posted on 12/21/2005 3:40:45 AM PST by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000

One out of eleven. That can only mean one thing.


A liberal Democrat with visions of a book deal.


17 posted on 12/21/2005 3:43:32 AM PST by airborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000

Surprise, surprise ... a Clinton appointee.


18 posted on 12/21/2005 3:45:31 AM PST by isrul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
The problem is that he only resigned from the Surveillance court. He did not resign his position as a federal judge.

If he feels so strongly about it he should do the honorable thing and step down from the federal bench.

19 posted on 12/21/2005 4:01:21 AM PST by RdhseRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Just love it when another Clintoon appointee bites the dust. What do lyou bet he will be looking for a way to recant his resignation. LOL. Amen.
20 posted on 12/21/2005 4:05:42 AM PST by gakrak ("A wise man's heart is his right hand, But a fool's heart is at his left" Eccl 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Isn't this exactly the type of reasonable, rational and impartial person we need on the courts?

Seriously, the country is better off without this kind of partisan hack on such an important court. Now "W" or John Roberts (Not sure which) gets to appoint a much better judge in his place.

Thanks Dude!!
21 posted on 12/21/2005 4:29:48 AM PST by msnimje (Political Correctness -- An OFFENSIVE attempt not to offend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000

good riddence.

In fact I hope more liberal judges quit the federal bench.


22 posted on 12/21/2005 4:33:06 AM PST by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
He was so concerned he continued to sit on the FISA court for 4 more years. Until the NYT runs a story about it.

Sure he was concerned. Just like Rockefeller and Pelosi.
24 posted on 12/21/2005 4:43:05 AM PST by PogySailor (Semper Fi to the Marines of 3/1.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Two associates familiar with his decision said yesterday that Robertson privately expressed deep concern that the warrantless surveillance program authorized by the president in 2001 was legally questionable and may have tainted the FISA court's work.

Ok, let's see....judge expressed deep concern, but by mere coincidence the Clinton appointee waits until 4 years after the fact, and the middle a big media $**+ storm to resign. Wouldn't it be interesting to know what his follow-on job is?

25 posted on 12/21/2005 4:49:47 AM PST by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000

Maybe he resigned because he's part of the leak to the Times.


26 posted on 12/21/2005 6:04:43 AM PST by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway~~John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
So I assume he approved it when Clinton did it. That's the scary thing.
29 posted on 12/21/2005 6:21:13 AM PST by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Other thread
31 posted on 12/21/2005 6:26:44 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson