Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Steffen role is focus of hearing
Baltimore Sun ^ | 12/21/05 | Jennifer Skalka and JoAnna Daemmrich

Posted on 12/21/2005 6:28:50 AM PST by smithone

Edited on 12/21/2005 6:36:36 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

Steffen role is focus of hearing

He was assigned to state agency by top Ehrlich aide, Cabinet official says



By Jennifer Skalka and JoAnna Daemmrich
Sun reporters

December 21, 2005

Joseph F. Steffen Jr., discounted by the Ehrlich administration as a rogue employee who operated on his own to target workers for firing, was assigned to a large state agency by the governor's chief of staff and reported to him directly, state Human Resources Secretary Christopher J. McCabe testified yesterday.

Steffen's work at the department prompted McCabe to raise concerns with the governor's legal counsel, Jervis S. Finney, and his chief of staff, Steven L. Kreseski, McCabe told a legislative committee investigating Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s hiring practices.

Agency staffing changes were made with dignity and respect, McCabe said, and were necessary to create a well-run operation. But Steffen, who kept figures of Darth Vader and the Grim Reaper on his desk, "had a dark sense of humor that I learned made me uncomfortable and others uncomfortable," McCabe testified.

McCabe, the first administration official to testify, spoke during a marathon meeting of a bipartisan panel examining whether Ehrlich's team fired employees for political reasons to replace them with workers who would promote their agenda.

Republicans have criticized the effort for its partisanship, noting that a new governor is entitled to fill some state jobs with new people. Democrats maintain that the review could lead to personnel policy reforms and a better understanding of how the Ehrlich administration does business.

Excerpt


TOPICS: Extended News; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: md4bush; omalley; steffan

1 posted on 12/21/2005 6:28:50 AM PST by smithone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: smithone
I thought this investigation forbade Republicans from subpoena authority so they would not be able to introduce the democrat roots of the project.

Why is the panel bipartisan? Why are Republicans, throught their participation, giving credence to a democrat witch hunt?

2 posted on 12/21/2005 7:06:24 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCPAC; MD4Bush; xcullen; Anti-Bubba182; Mo1; cyncooper; BillF; crushkerry; Howlin; backhoe; ...

MD4Bush Ping!


3 posted on 12/21/2005 7:35:00 AM PST by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

Thanks for the ping.


4 posted on 12/21/2005 7:36:26 AM PST by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: smithone
One thing is for sure. In the tragic event Governor Ehrlich is defeated for reelection, any conservatives holding state positions will get fired the day after his successor's inaugural.
5 posted on 12/21/2005 8:02:52 AM PST by Heatseeker (Never underestimate the left's tendency to underestimate us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

Hmmm.


6 posted on 12/21/2005 8:09:42 AM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven
Hmmm.

Huh? Care to elaborate on that Hmmm?

This story is tangentially related to the MD4Bush saga. It deals with the MD Democrat firing practices committee circus. NCPAC is mentioned.
7 posted on 12/21/2005 8:16:11 AM PST by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

No doubt it's related, but it doesn't seem to paint Steffen in a good light at all. It is the Sun of course, so I guess it's to be expected.


8 posted on 12/21/2005 9:38:15 AM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

Thanks for the ping.


9 posted on 12/21/2005 3:07:59 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven
but it doesn't seem to paint Steffen in a good light at all

Sure. The article CALLS Steffen a "rogue" employee. That is incorrect. If there is a correct wording, it is this: Steffan was involved in something which was not job-related, and in that venue, was baited by MD4Bush, a dem operative.

I figure the "single-lobed" biased "author" of the article called Steffan a "rogue employee" but only to provide a basis to blaming Erhlich for laying-off "non-rogue" employees. The bias in the article is clear.

10 posted on 12/21/2005 4:10:20 PM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson