Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tight-fitting clothes 'in' at DIA
Rocky Mountain News ^ | December 22, 2005 | Ann Imse

Posted on 12/22/2005 6:20:44 AM PST by loreldan

Snugger attire advised if passengers want to avoid security line pat-downs

December 22, 2005 Tight sweaters and tight jeans are suddenly fashionable when it comes to flying. Starting today, airport security screeners are boosting the number of random pat-downs they conduct as they beef up efforts to spot potential suicide bombers and other terrorists. But you can cut your chance of being hand-searched by wearing clothes that can't possibly hide a bomb.

That advice comes from Patrick Ahlstrom, Transportation Security Administration chief at Denver International Airport.

Ahlstrom said his screeners won't need to do pat-downs as much on people who are obviously not hiding anything, as opposed to a person wearing "voluminous" clothing that could conceal explosives.

Coats come off in any case, he added.

Ahlstrom said screeners will scan with wands and pat down travelers more often and more thoroughly because of the increasing use of bombs by terrorists around the world. He cited a pair of Russian plane crashes last year that were blamed on two Chechen women who boarded the aircraft wearing bomb belts under their clothes.

Asked if there is any specific reason to think terrorists are trying to plant bombs on American jets, Ahlstrom said, "There's no new intelligence to indicate a particular immediate threat of any kind."

Also starting today, the TSA is loosening its restrictions on scissors with less than a 4-inch blade, so screeners can spend less time rummaging for such items and more time on pat-downs, he said. Screwdrivers, pliers and some other tools less than 7 inches long also will be allowed.

TSA chief Kip Hawley has said that one-fourth of the 30 million items confiscated by the TSA since 2002 fit in this category.

The Association of Flight Attendants strongly disagrees with the TSA's claim that such items are low-risk.

AFA chief Patricia Friend testified before Congress earlier this month that the change "will further endanger the lives of all flight attendants and the passengers we work so hard to keep safe and secure."

All knives are still prohibited.

Dealing with screeners

• Don't wear baggy clothes that could conceal a bomb.

• If you are chosen for a pat-down, the screener is supposed to be of the same gender, except in extraordinary circumstances.

• You may ask to be patted down or scanned by a wand in private.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Colorado; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: airlinesecurity; nospandexplease; tightfittingjeans; tsa; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
Coming soon to DIA - lots of snow bunnies! ;~) Wear tight clothes or get a pat-down...Hmmm, some choice!
1 posted on 12/22/2005 6:20:45 AM PST by loreldan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: loreldan

Looks like Britney, et al will be in the clear!


2 posted on 12/22/2005 6:23:21 AM PST by Paved Paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loreldan
Snow bunnies?


3 posted on 12/22/2005 6:23:59 AM PST by Xenophobic Alien (Kerry lost. Please take that stupid bumper sticker off your car!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loreldan

Yeah, baby!


4 posted on 12/22/2005 6:24:14 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loreldan

What, no pictures?


5 posted on 12/22/2005 6:24:18 AM PST by neodad (Rule Number 1: Be Armed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loreldan
The wearing of bras and panties is also highly discouraged as well! Image hosted by Photobucket.com
6 posted on 12/22/2005 6:24:22 AM PST by stm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paved Paradise

Too bad for the screeners, huh? They'd probably rather do the pat-down...


7 posted on 12/22/2005 6:24:33 AM PST by loreldan (Lincoln, Reagan, & G. W. Bush - the cure for Democrat lunacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: loreldan

But the busty ones will need to be inspected. They could be fake and full of C4 instead of silicone.


8 posted on 12/22/2005 6:24:57 AM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loreldan

TSA Agent: "Hmmm, that skimpy little outfit is awfully tight and I doubt you could conceal anything in there (Lord knows the outfit doesn't conceal much), but I think I need to pat you down anyway. In fact, I'm inclined to slip a ten dollar bill in your garter."


9 posted on 12/22/2005 6:25:06 AM PST by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loreldan

This is disgusting!


10 posted on 12/22/2005 6:26:46 AM PST by Tax-chick ("Dick Cheney never trims his own nails. He simply stares at them until the tips melt off.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loreldan
• If you are chosen for a pat-down, the screener is supposed to be of the same gender, except in extraordinary circumstances.

That's a real comfort at SFO. Maybe the screener should be required by law to be a physically atttractive member of the opposite sex - the complaints would probably go way down. ;)

11 posted on 12/22/2005 6:27:42 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ("When government does too much, nobody else does much of anything." -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

Can you believe our government is actually recommending people wear tight clothes? My ancestors are turning over in their graves!


12 posted on 12/22/2005 6:27:55 AM PST by loreldan (Lincoln, Reagan, & G. W. Bush - the cure for Democrat lunacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Xenophobic Alien

 

The one on the left looks very suspicious to me...

 

13 posted on 12/22/2005 6:28:01 AM PST by Fintan (See??? Sometimes I do read the articles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: loreldan

The whole screening deal seems whacky...


14 posted on 12/22/2005 6:28:40 AM PST by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loreldan

True. I'm not even sure if the tight clothes are going to exempt people anyway. Also, the people who'll end up wearing the tight clothes will be the ones who shouldn't. You just know it.


15 posted on 12/22/2005 6:29:54 AM PST by Paved Paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Guess what job all the sexual predators out there are applying for...


16 posted on 12/22/2005 6:30:05 AM PST by loreldan (Lincoln, Reagan, & G. W. Bush - the cure for Democrat lunacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: loreldan
Not too many passengers look that good in tight attire as say this number, who has apparently followed all the rules:


17 posted on 12/22/2005 6:30:55 AM PST by Paul Ross (My idea of American policy toward the Soviet Union is simple...It is this, 'We win and they lose.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loreldan

Uh-huh. And there have been so many incidents of Americans getting on airplanes with bombs under their sweatshirts, too ... anything it takes to prevent more of these tragedies!


18 posted on 12/22/2005 6:31:45 AM PST by Tax-chick ("Dick Cheney never trims his own nails. He simply stares at them until the tips melt off.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: loreldan

How do I know that the 250+ lbs. type folks (both male and female) are going to be pursuing this to its illogical end - spandex should be a privelege, not a right!!! ;-P


19 posted on 12/22/2005 6:33:30 AM PST by MortMan (There is no substitute for victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fintan

Indeed. A group of terrorists if I ever saw one. Pat them all down.


20 posted on 12/22/2005 6:34:00 AM PST by rattrap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson