Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The New York Times' Christmas Gift(Michael Barone nails the NYT...again!)
Real Clear Politics ^ | December 26, 2005 | Michael Barone

Posted on 12/26/2005 8:29:41 AM PST by kellynla

The New York Times' Christmas gift -- sorry, holiday gift -- to the nation's political dialogue was its Dec. 16 story reporting that the National Security Agency has been intercepting telephone conversations between terrorism suspects abroad and U.S. citizens or legal residents in the United States.

What the Times didn't bother telling its readers is that this practice is far from new and is entirely legal. Instead, the unspoken subtext of the story was that this was likely an illegal and certainly a very scary invasion of Americans' rights.

Let's put the issue very simply. The president has the power as commander in chief under the Constitution to intercept and monitor the communications of America's enemies. Indeed, it would be a very weird interpretation of the Constitution to say that the commander in chief could order U.S. forces to kill America's enemies but not to wiretap -- or, more likely these days, electronically intercept -- their communications. Presidents have asserted and exercised this power repeatedly and consistently over the last quarter-century.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: barone; gifts; homelanesecurity; nyt; patriotleak; spying; terrorism; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: cbkaty

The New York Times is nothing but a Short Sell opportunity.


41 posted on 12/26/2005 11:18:03 AM PST by agincourt1415 (Democrats still lose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: NeonKnight
I had 2 or 3 real life lib friends telling me last week how this was going to be the one to destroy Bush.

Might want to point out to them how this has moved Bush's JA up to 50% for the 1st time since July. Going to be a real kick in the teeth for them when Reality bites them again.

Love the newest Talking Point. "Just because Bush says he didn't break the law doesn't mean he didn't". To which I respond, "Nether does your claiming he did mean he did".

Liberals must really be low low IQs. They seem as Evolutionary Challenged as the Dinasours or the Dodo birds.

42 posted on 12/26/2005 11:22:16 AM PST by MNJohnnie (We do not create terrorism by fighting the terrorists. We invite terrorism by ignoring them.--GWBush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: agincourt1415

N.Y. Times warns of profit plunge

By David B. Wilkerson, MarketWatch

Last Update: 5:45 PM ET Dec. 21, 2005

CHICAGO (MarketWatch) - New York Times Co. said after the market closed Wednesday that its fourth-quarter profit would plunge 39% from that of a year earlier on charges related to job cuts announced in September, as well as stock-based compensation expense.


43 posted on 12/26/2005 11:32:37 AM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
Its a tempting short, say 1000 shares, and from now down 20 dollars in 1 year or less, thats a nice $20,000 profit.

Make a profit on the demise of a Liberal Newspaper!

44 posted on 12/26/2005 11:47:44 AM PST by agincourt1415 (Democrats still lose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: agincourt1415

What a great opportinity to profit on the demise of these buttheads.


45 posted on 12/26/2005 1:07:46 PM PST by privatedick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: steelcurtain
"media war...against Bush"

Simply put Big Media and their masters the Dems always suspect the worst about Republicans. These paranoid morons are more than ready to believe that Bush and other Republicans are eager to listen in on Demcratic-voting old Mrs. Jones who lives down street. Because they're evil, nasty fascists, they want to throw nice old Mrs. Jones into the klink for some cooked-up reason. Why Republicans would want to do this is left unsaid. It reveals more about the paranoid, screwy mental state of Dems than it does about the CIC.

46 posted on 12/26/2005 1:37:55 PM PST by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

The Constitution, Justice Robert Jackson famously wrote, should not be interpreted in a way that makes it "a suicide pact."

IINM, it was in Jackson's dissent in Terminiello v. Chicago (1949-ish), where wrote, "if the Court does not temper its doctrinaire logic with a little practical wisdom, it is in danger of turning the Constitutional Bill of rights into a suicide pact."


47 posted on 12/26/2005 11:42:45 PM PST by eddiespaghetti ( with the meatball eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson