Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Philadelphia School District Lawyer Calls Jurors 'Crackers'
NBC10 ^

Posted on 12/28/2005 7:43:51 AM PST by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick

Can you recall where you saw or learned that?


61 posted on 12/28/2005 10:18:29 AM PST by kylaka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kylaka

Virginia as a child. I heard someone say it and asked my grandfather what they meant.


62 posted on 12/28/2005 10:21:51 AM PST by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: geezerwheezer
Let me get this straight...A black manager fires a bunch of white workers....they sue for discrimination....they win the suit....and the black lawyer for the defendant calls the white folks on the jury racial names....and the Philadelphia school system employed this racist to represent them before a jury?

Hallelujah! Celebration and rejoicing! Blacks are now fully equal in all respects and enjoy the societal benefits of Bull Connors at his height.

63 posted on 12/28/2005 10:27:49 AM PST by LexBaird ("I'm not questioning your patriotism, I'm answering your treason."--JennysCool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: geezerwheezer

If this lawyer had been out in California...his career would be terminated. He would have spent months in specialized training to overcome his shortfalls in management.


64 posted on 12/28/2005 10:30:36 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 1L
Actually, he DOES get to say whatever he wants. He was not in court, but in an elevator.

It does not matter if he was in an elevator or on the dark side of the Moon, he remains an officer of the court and it is just as impermissible for him to verbally attack members of a jury as it would be for him to insult the judge. There are strict codes of propriety that this guy signed on to when he was admitted to the bar, and they are in force 27/7, not just when he's in the courtroom.

65 posted on 12/28/2005 11:35:34 AM PST by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
Entertaining?


66 posted on 12/28/2005 11:42:02 AM PST by CougarGA7 (If children are a gift from God, is adoption regifting?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Ditto

Would you please post the authority for your statement.


67 posted on 12/28/2005 11:57:57 AM PST by 1L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: aspen64

Thuggerly love


68 posted on 12/28/2005 12:25:12 PM PST by Scarpetta (e pluribus victim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 1L

I would say that his remarks seriously impacts the discussions on how the appeals process continues or is settled.


69 posted on 12/28/2005 12:37:41 PM PST by reagandemo (The battle is near are you ready for the sacrifice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

True, and then he would be "monitored" for a few years to be certain his racist views were not returning to his practice. Actually, were I one of the jurors he said that to/or about, I would file a formal complaint with the Pennsylvania Bar Association and have him disbarred, or sanctioned in the extreme. We have no business allowing these kinds of comments to go unchallenged, by black lawyers or white lawyers! (Indian & Chinese lawyers get a pass on this!) :0) (please excuse sarcasm as noted!)


70 posted on 12/28/2005 12:38:49 PM PST by geezerwheezer (get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Yeah, when I was a little boy back on the farm in Tennessee, there was a joke that the older folks liked to tell. "Hey, did you hear about that new factory that just opened? It's a cracker factory; the women pack the crackers and the men crack ..."


71 posted on 12/28/2005 12:39:28 PM PST by Rider on the Rain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

http://www.blankrome.com/images/attypics/02106.jpg


Carl E. Singley
Partner

Mr. Singley concentrates his practice in the areas of civil litigation and appellate advocacy, legal ethics, government contracts and business law. Mr. Singley had been a tenured professor of law at Temple University since 1976, where he served as dean from 1983-1987. He also served as first deputy city solicitor for the City of Philadelphia from 1980-1982. From 1987-2000, Mr. Singley also practiced law and represented Fortune 500 companies in procurement matters; advised various local and state governments on a wide variety of state and municipal law matters; and served as counsel in numerous public finance transactions totaling over $4.5 billion. Mr. Singley has litigated and argued cases on libel and defamation, business law, civil liability, constitutional law, and municipal law in various state and federal courts, and he serves as an expert witness on legal ethics.

Mr. Singley has written and published numerous articles and essays on a wide variety of subjects over the past 25 years including legal ethics, criminal justice, jury trials, affirmative action, legal history, municipal finance, leadership theory and golf. Mr. Singley is a frequent public speaker for diverse professional, business and civic organizations and has given over 250 speeches locally and nationally since 1985. He is also the recipient of over 80 awards and citations.



******


'These men were playing the race card."

That's what prominent African American attorney Carl Singley, working on behalf of the Philadelphia School District, said last week in the closing argument of a trial in which four white defendants claimed they were dismissed from their jobs because they were white.


snip


The gavel had barely sounded to end the trial when Singley played the race card himself. In a post-verdict exchange in a courthouse elevator, he called several white jurors in the case "crackers" - a derogatory name for white people.

He later apologized for his "inappropriate comments" in front of U.S. District Judge Harvey Bartle 3d and five of the seven jurors.


http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/13461271.htm


72 posted on 12/28/2005 12:51:24 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver


January 16-22, 2003


snip



in the early '70s, it was Singley, then a law professor at Temple University

After serving as professor, then dean of Temple Law, he was first deputy city solicitor under Mayor Bill Green before returning to private practice. Today, Singley is a partner at Blank Rome LLP, one of the city's most prestigious law firms.


snip


Singley has been instrumental in forming a search party determined to find a Democratic candidate to oust Street in the primaries, and short of that would throw his considerable weight behind the Republican Sam Katz.



http://tinyurl.com/86w4h


73 posted on 12/28/2005 12:56:34 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_no_exceptions

Wikipedia doesn't have a clue as to what the term Cracker means !!!


74 posted on 12/28/2005 12:59:14 PM PST by enots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 1L
While a judge MAY have some inherent powers in his own court, he doesn't get to control speech outside the court. I think the judge might be on solid ground exercising HIS first amendment rights about what the lawyer said, and he can make it sound intimidating. If that's what happened, then fine. But for a judge to assume he has the power to control the speech of a lawyer in an elevator, he is abusing his power.

If I was being verbally abused by a city attorney over how I decided a case as a juror, I would complain about intimidating conduct by a city official. The lawyer should be suspended for unprofessional conduct

75 posted on 12/28/2005 1:03:00 PM PST by SauronOfMordor (A planned society is most appealing to those with the hubris to think they will be the planners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: philsfan24

Wikipedia?

I wouldn't waste a mouse click to go to that site.


76 posted on 12/28/2005 1:11:14 PM PST by toddlintown (Lennon takes six bullets to the chest, Yoko is standing right next to him and not one f'ing bullet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots

I haven't seen this before. If this is real and not photo shopped, this guy is an even bigger ***hole than I have ever imagined. What an incredible nitwit.


77 posted on 12/28/2005 1:37:06 PM PST by babydoll22 (If you stop growing as a person you live in your own private hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: reagandemo

It wouldn't have any effect on either the appeals process or whether the case is settled. If civil procedure in that state is even remotely similar to what I'm familiar with, a Motion for New Trial won't be ruled upon (denied by operation of law) or would be denied anyway. As far as settlement goes, the other sides' attorney(s) isn't going to care what he said about the jurors.

The only place it really has an impact is this guy's continued appearance in that court -- on that or other cases.


78 posted on 12/28/2005 2:08:47 PM PST by 1L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor

The guy was outside counsel -- not a governmental employee -- and complaints will probably fall on deaf ears.

IF an Assistant DA did this, then yes, I would agree with you that some sort of complain is in order -- to the DA, County Commissioner's Court (or your state's equivilent), etc. However, while he probably will face a big chewing out over this from his firm's senior partners (if he isn't one himself), I don't think they hand down suspensions.

This firm might have bigger problems, as its likely going to have to explain to its client why they recommended trial over what likely was a reasonable settlement. I'm guessing, of course, but I'd be surprised if the Plaintiff's offer wasn't reasonable.


79 posted on 12/28/2005 2:14:58 PM PST by 1L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: babydoll22
I haven't seen this before. If this is real and not photo shopped, this guy is an even bigger ***hole than I have ever imagined. What an incredible nitwit.

I imagine that you are referring to the John Kerry photo where he is giving the black power salute. That is NOT PHOTOSHOPPED.

This was at an NAACP event. Could you imagine if Bush did this?


80 posted on 12/28/2005 2:31:30 PM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson