Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Questions the Islamic Society should answer
The Boston Globe ^ | 1 Jan 2006 | Jeff Jacoby

Posted on 01/01/2006 12:07:52 PM PST by Ben Mugged

EVER SINCE 9/11, we learned last month, federal officials have been monitoring radiation levels around a number of American mosques. It is an understandable precaution, given Al Qaeda's interest in acquiring nuclear weapons, and its history of mass murder.

Understandable -- but also troubling. In a nation as tolerant as this one, nobody can be happy about the need to focus self-defensive attention on mosques. Unfortunately, we are at war with violent Islamist radicals, and they are not above using mosques to incubate terrorism. If there is evidence of heightened radioactivity around a Muslim facility, the government should be aware of it, and should find out -- lawfully, of course -- whether it represents a threat.

The federal monitors have been checking for physical radiation, but there are other ways in which mosques can be radioactive.

Last year, for example, Freedom House issued a report on the extent to which Saudi publications in US mosques promote Wahhabism, the harsh, supremacist version of Islam that is the established creed in Saudi Arabia. Many of these publications, it turned out, were riddled with religious bigotry. They advocated contempt for ''infidels," portrayed America as alien territory, and urged Muslims to prepare for jihad. Considering the use of such teachings in recruiting terrorists, one might well view the presence of this literature in the library of an American mosque as ''radioactive," and a legitimate cause for concern.

Which brings us to the roiling controversy over the mosque being built by the Islamic Society of Boston -- a controversy made all the worse by an abusive lawsuit the Islamic Society has filed against its critics.

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: freedomhouse; homelandsecurity; islam; islamofacism; jacoby; mosques; muslim; muslimamericans; nest; radioactivematerial; spying; terrorism; wahhabism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
The second front in the war is the direct assault on american Christianity by jihad. The Muslim intent is to make America a Muslim caliphate.
1 posted on 01/01/2006 12:07:53 PM PST by Ben Mugged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

Thank God for the second amendment. The people will control the moose if need be.


2 posted on 01/01/2006 12:14:50 PM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

Absolute whizzbang column by Jeff Jacoby!


3 posted on 01/01/2006 12:17:08 PM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged
"In a nation as tolerant as this one, nobody can be happy about the need to focus self-defensive attention on mosques."

Not troubling at all, if one knows a modicum of history.

The naivete of some Americans that think that anything that pretends to be a "religion" is just like Christianity, is really astounding. It's like politely holding the door open for our assassin to come in and do his dirty work.

By the way, look up the word "assassin" sometime and see what its roots are.

4 posted on 01/01/2006 12:17:10 PM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged
Saudi publications in US mosques promote Wahhabism, the harsh, supremacist version of Islam that is the established creed in Saudi Arabia.

The spicy form of ROP!


5 posted on 01/01/2006 12:19:51 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged
It might be worth noting that it has been agreed that the a mosque is to be built in London as part of the 2012 Olympic games. It will also be a massive structure becoming the biggest worship building of any religion in UK.

Well, it seems to me that this is a provocative symbolic gesture. But it is to go ahead.

Seems like a another piece of a picture to me....
6 posted on 01/01/2006 12:20:37 PM PST by vimto (Life isn't a dry run)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

Let's hope the mosque is packed with FBI agents recording everything.


7 posted on 01/01/2006 12:20:38 PM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

HERE IS YOUR AMMO

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1550295/posts



http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/default.htm#attacks

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/


8 posted on 01/01/2006 12:20:53 PM PST by CHICAGOFARMER (Right to Carry (RTC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

I encourage all to prepare for the jihad and be ready to quell it with a nationwide response that'll send these wouldbe soilders whining back to moma.


9 posted on 01/01/2006 12:26:56 PM PST by wildcatf4f3 (the friend of my enemy is my enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wildcatf4f3
In a nation as tolerant as this one, nobody can be happy about the need to focus self-defensive attention on mosques.

In every muslim country around the world, mosques are the way stations for al qaeda, the venues for terrorist plotting, and the caches for weapons. That is an unassailable fact. Why should we think it's any different in America?

10 posted on 01/01/2006 12:42:19 PM PST by gotribe (Hillary: Accessory to Rape)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gotribe

Nonsense!


11 posted on 01/01/2006 1:47:35 PM PST by Valin (Purple Fingers Rule!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Nonsense!

Huh? The west is used to thinking of churches as sanctuaries. Muslims know this. That's why they stocked their Mosques with weapons in Iraq during the American invasion. They figured the Americans and Europeans would respect sanctuary in Iraq. So why would one expect Muslims to act any different elsewhere? Nonsense is about as stupid an answer I have heard.

12 posted on 01/01/2006 2:00:05 PM PST by LoneRangerMassachusetts (Some say what's good for others, the others make the goods; it's the meddlers against the peddlers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hershey
It was in part on the strength of that pledge that the Islamic Society was allowed to buy the land for the mosque from the city for a fraction of its fair market value.

Imagine the outcry if Boston sold land to a church for a fraction of its fair market value. Impossible to imagine, isn't it?

13 posted on 01/01/2006 2:22:36 PM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged
Instead it accuses its critics of defamation, and has sued many of them for -- of all things -- conspiring to deprive Boston-area Muslims of their religious freedom.

Pathetic. Imagine if Christians did this every time someone criticized us.

Thanks for this post!

14 posted on 01/01/2006 2:29:08 PM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts

That's why they stocked their Mosques with weapons in Iraq during the American invasion.

Some were...most were not.

They figured the Americans and Europeans would respect sanctuary in Iraq.

They figured wrong didn't they? We (mostly) sent our Iraqi (Muslim) allies in.


Once again I see the attitude that all Muslims think and act alike. When ever I see this my answer will be "Nonsense".


15 posted on 01/01/2006 2:40:36 PM PST by Valin (Purple Fingers Rule!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

Religions maintain their tax-exempt status in this country, in part, by not engaging in openly partisan politics. Given islams universal tolerance for and demonstrable support for world-wide islamofascism, )a partisan political effort if ever there was one), they should be stripped of their tax exemption and made to file full disclosures like any PAC.


16 posted on 01/01/2006 2:45:24 PM PST by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

Jeff Jacoby Bump.


17 posted on 01/01/2006 2:46:58 PM PST by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen
Isn't that defacto subsidy of the Muslim religion? Why doesn't the ACLU sue Boston? Where is the outrage?
18 posted on 01/01/2006 3:09:14 PM PST by Ben Mugged (Unions are the stormtroopers of socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

Perhaps some MA Freepers can approach the local ACLU about filing such a suit. One tactic to defang the ACLU is to get them to live up to their purported ideals and attack state support (or anything that looks like it) of non-Christian religions with equal vigor to their attacks on anything that looks to them like state support of Christianity. It would use their resources in a useful cause if they did it, and make manifest hypocrits out of them if they didn't. Either way, it's a net plus.


19 posted on 01/01/2006 4:48:56 PM PST by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David; All

How about it you Boston FReepers?


20 posted on 01/01/2006 4:52:03 PM PST by Ben Mugged (Unions are the stormtroopers of socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson