Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

There Will Be No Civil Liberties If We Lose This War
The New Media Journal.us ^ | December 30, 2005 | Frank Salvato

Posted on 01/01/2006 2:55:51 PM PST by SunSetSam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 401-419 next last
To: Dan Evans

I suppose in that kind of convoluted way you are right. But, they will also take over a non-free people as well. They hate us because we are not them. I notice alot of people don't seem to understand that.
susie


241 posted on 01/02/2006 3:39:07 PM PST by brytlea (I'm not a conspiracy theorist....really.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans

Well, I'm glad you set me straight. I really was all set to use my time machine!
susie


242 posted on 01/02/2006 3:40:50 PM PST by brytlea (I'm not a conspiracy theorist....really.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: pbrown
How much liberty will you have should the islamofacist win in the US? What rights will they guarantee you?

What kind of insanity would lead a person to believe that the jihadis can win in the US? How much liberty will you have should winged pigs win in the US?

243 posted on 01/02/2006 3:45:32 PM PST by tortoise (All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: brytlea
For the most part, the inmates were running the assylum

Yes I know! But that's another thing I suspect. The real troublemakers are not punished because the administrators are afraid of them and their families. The ones who are disciplined are the ones who aren't likely to fight back with violence.

244 posted on 01/02/2006 3:47:33 PM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans

Actually, for the most part the kids had to do something pretty bad to even get the parent's involved. Really, most schools are afraid to tick parents off. I know it doesn't seem like that from the news, but it seems (in my experience, both as a teacher and a parent) to be true.
It's NOTHING like when I was a kid. We were afraid of the teachers and principals (in a respectful sort of way). The kids today aren't afraid of much.
I'm sure there is some abuse, there always is when anyone has power over another, but I think the problems with schools are more subtle than that.
susie


245 posted on 01/02/2006 3:50:49 PM PST by brytlea (I'm not a conspiracy theorist....really.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: tortoise

Hmmm...winged pigs might actually be a good defense against the terrorists!
:)
Actually, I don't think it depends on your definition of them winning. I do think it's quite possible to be totally outnumbered and lose our way of life in the future. But, I don't think they could invade our shores tomorrow and win a war of that sort.
susie


246 posted on 01/02/2006 3:52:31 PM PST by brytlea (I'm not a conspiracy theorist....really.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: Dave Olson
If this was a matter of the President's collecting information to use against his political enemies, then that would be a concern.

Information is liable to used by anybody years later because it is stored. But a search of your luggage (just as unconconstitutional) does not get recorded.

The information in the 900 FBI files wasn't meant to be used for political purposes, but we can be sure it was.

We can get search warrants against terrorists. And I'm not sure that monitoring overseas communication requires a search warrant (I'll let the lawyers battle that one).

247 posted on 01/02/2006 3:53:57 PM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: tortoise
What kind of insanity would lead a person to believe that the jihadis can win in the US? How much liberty will you have should winged pigs win in the US?

They're taking over Europe without hardly firing a shot. I bet you never thought that would happen. I also bet you never thought they would fly planes into buildings either...did ya? A few well placed bombs here, taking out a few more thousand Americans, and Pelosi, kennedy, kerry, schummer, the old media, and all the other leftist and terrorist sympathizers in this country would try to hand this country to them on a silver platter.

They are terrorist, they spread terror.

Listen to the calls and prevent another 9-11 or something more catastrophic. All my freedoms won't do crap for me if I'm DEAD.

248 posted on 01/02/2006 4:00:40 PM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: tortoise
Considering what happened on 9-11, as well as the ten years of terrorists attacks on US interests before that, I would have to call your lack of awareness delusional. Terrorists don't need to invade our shores when they can kill a few thousand of us every now and than, and have willing accomplices in the government attempt the cultural shifts they desire.
249 posted on 01/02/2006 4:11:13 PM PST by SunSetSam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: pbrown

What I find amazing is the carping over the "loss of freedom" when we are at war, when the reality is that we have lost more freedom with election law changes and over religious expression at Christmas than we have during the entire war on terror.


250 posted on 01/02/2006 4:13:17 PM PST by SunSetSam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: SunSetSam

I agree. Amazing.


251 posted on 01/02/2006 4:26:02 PM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: pbrown
They're taking over Europe without hardly firing a shot.

Yeah, well, that is Europe. This is America. If the Europeans can't keep their country, then there was nothing there worth keeping. It is a battle of character and constitution -- he who has the biggest balls will win (metaphorically). Americans still clank when they walk.

Though some days I do wonder. There are an awful lot of pathetic timid souls in America, as is in evidence on this thread. Living is inherently dangerous -- we all die sometime -- and people need to stop pretending like they can change this fact if they just give the government more power.

I also bet you never thought they would fly planes into buildings either...did ya?

Oh, I've been expecting far worse for decades. This kind of thing is going to happen in the real world. An American is many orders of magnitude more likely to die at the hands of another American, intentionally or otherwise, than at the hands of a jihadi jackass. The jihadis are statistical noise, and should be treated as such. Smack'em hard if you happen to find them, but don't reorganize the bloody world on their account.

A few well placed bombs here, taking out a few more thousand Americans, and Pelosi, kennedy, kerry, schummer, the old media, and all the other leftist and terrorist sympathizers in this country would try to hand this country to them on a silver platter.

The craven left-wing speaks for themselves, not for your average American. Americans are venal, but nowhere near as venal as those talking hand puppets. The psychotic left can do quite a bit of damage, but they do not have the power to hand this country over to the jihadis, even in their best wet dreams.

They are terrorist, they spread terror.

Terror is a voluntary response that never killed anyone.

Listen to the calls and prevent another 9-11 or something more catastrophic. All my freedoms won't do crap for me if I'm DEAD.

Whether or not you are dead is really irrelevant. Your eating habits are more likely to kill you than a terrorist, but we are not asking the government to inspect our shopping lists.

We are all dead one way or another -- there is nothing special about dying. What makes life special is what we do while we live, and the amount of freedom we have determines the limits of what we can do while we live. I'd rather have a life of boundless opportunity with the freedom to make or break it as I see fit than to gain the weak promise of a few more days of a drab life under heavy-handed government.

I'll take quality over quantity, thank-you-very-much. Though you will notice that average quality of life tends to correlate with average quantity of life, historically. Freedom generates wealth generates power.

252 posted on 01/02/2006 4:32:06 PM PST by tortoise (All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: pbrown
You missed my point. Freedom without a country to practice it in, is useless.

I can't imagine how the terrorists could take our country by armed force. I can imagine that we could lose our freedoms.

How do you suggest that we rebuild buildings should the worse scenario happen? Our economy will be destroyed. No money.

We have the strongest economy in the world. If half of it were destroyed, we would still have the GDP of Sweden. But they couldn't even do that because there really aren't that many loose nukes.

How long would we stay rich? Let's say for the sake of argument that New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco, and any large city was wiped out.

Pretty much the same thing happened to Japan. But today they are a major economic power.

There will be no tyrant in the United States. I have more faith in our citizens to believe that for a second.

I don't. We came within a gnat's eyelash of having a President Gore or a President Kerry. They elected Bill Clinton president -- twice! Clinton did more to appease the terrorists and empower evil regimes than anyone else. He and his cronies were digging though the dirt in those FBI files and God only knows what he found. Why do you think he wasn't removed from office?

253 posted on 01/02/2006 4:37:46 PM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: SunSetSam
Terrorists don't need to invade our shores when they can kill a few thousand of us every now and than

A few thousand out of 300 million. Three thousand is mere statistical noise, as much as it sucks to be one of those three thousand. Ironically, we ignore the tens of thousands that died that same day from other unfortunate causes that had nothing to do with terrorism.

You would condemn 300 million Americans to a life under heavy-handed oppressive government to save the lives of a few thousand unlucky people. That is an immoral and disgraceful position that reeks of cowardice. How do you get out of bed in the morning?

Fortunately for us, our Founding Fathers were willing to step up to the plate and risk many thousands of lives for the freedoms of a couple million. They would find your "if it saves one life" argument to be an appalling and disgusting calculus. Apparently inflation has taken a horrific toll on the value of our freedoms.

254 posted on 01/02/2006 4:40:14 PM PST by tortoise (All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: pbrown
If al queda is calling 555-2355, I want to know who they are talking too, that could prevent that scenario from ever coming to fruition.

I would like to know too, but the phone company and I and everyone else is prevented by law from listening to those calls. So why don't we do this? Instead of giving the government the power to listen in, why not give Americans that right?

Why don't we start thinking in terms of trusting citizens to do the right thing instead of trusting the government?

255 posted on 01/02/2006 4:43:16 PM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans
Why don't we start thinking in terms of trusting citizens to do the right thing instead of trusting the government?

A private citizen does not become more trustworthy just because they take the title of "government bureaucrat".

256 posted on 01/02/2006 4:45:21 PM PST by tortoise (All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: tortoise
Let 'em listen to phone calls. Bush is doing something right, they haven't hit us with another 9-11. Let 'em read e-mails. Mine will bore them to tears. And if, when reading e-mails should they come across a coded message and they stop another attack, just say thank you to the government.

Don't want the government reading or listening to your correspondence...use snail mail. Nothing is private anymore, to think so is being either naive or dense.

As long as we're in this war, the government needs to do what it needs to do to protect us.

257 posted on 01/02/2006 4:46:20 PM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Ask Carter and Clinton. They also had domestic spying programs.


258 posted on 01/02/2006 4:46:27 PM PST by YourAdHere (Viking kitties taste like chicken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SunSetSam
The Bill of Rights has been suspended on previous occasions (Lincoln and FDR) so your very point of whether it "can" be done is moot.

Banks have been robbed before while the robbers got away. That doesn't make it legal. OJ Simpson hacked up his wife and he was acquitted. Doesn't make it right.

The fact that the Supreme Court hasn't ruled on whether Lincoln and FDR's transgressions were constitutional doesn't make them right. The court has refused to judge on a lot of unconstitutional gun control legislation but that doesn't mean the 2nd amendment doesn't apply anymore.

259 posted on 01/02/2006 4:54:33 PM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: pbrown
Nothing is private anymore, to think so is being either naive or dense.

I am in a position to be far more aware of this fact than most people.

The NSA has been doing this kind of thing for ages; my argument is not specific to that at all. I am arguing against the underlying idea that it is constructive in the long-term to give up civil liberties for the appearance of minor improvements in safety. Losing civil liberties to the government frequently creates at least as many problems for the private citizen as it eliminates, and rarely in a fashion that was envisioned when first implemented.

For example, guns were eliminated from airplanes to keep people safe from "bad guys with guns", though not because so many people actually died from "bad guys with guns". But I guarantee you that 9/11 would have been a much less significant event if we had not eliminated guns from airplanes to make the grass-eaters feel safer from "bad guys with guns". In the final calculus, making people feel "safer" probably needlessly cost many American lives, net. I'll bet there were an awful lot of American citizens on those planes that dearly wished the government would have let them carry a gun on board. Eliminating civil liberties inevitable has negative consequences for life and liberty down the line that the proponents of these "safety measures" never foresaw.

260 posted on 01/02/2006 4:59:03 PM PST by tortoise (All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 401-419 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson