To: ShadowAce
They tried to end support for NT4, but got hammered for it. They ended up supporting it for more then a year longer then they wanted to.
6 posted on
01/04/2006 10:09:07 AM PST by
TXBSAFH
("I would rather be a free man in my grave then living as a puppet or a slave." - Jimmy Cliff)
To: TXBSAFH; ShadowAce
They tried to end support for NT4, but got hammered for it. They ended up supporting it for more then a year longer then they wanted to. Win 2000 is NT5
XP is NT5.1
It's still the same crap code of NT !
Get Root !
9 posted on
01/04/2006 10:12:28 AM PST by
Uri’el-2012
(Trust in the YHvH for ever, for the LORD, YHvH is the Rock eternal. (Isaiah 26:4))
To: TXBSAFH
I just had to fix our product so it would run on NT, even though we say we don't support it. I guess this customer was just too important.
21 posted on
01/04/2006 10:23:42 AM PST by
MarkeyD
(Cowards cut and run. Marines finish the job. I really, really loathe liberals.)
To: TXBSAFH
in the lab where I work, over a thrid of our machines are NT. TO upgrade to another operating system would mean having to buy new instruments that the computers run. THat would kost $80-100K per machine - just not feasible.
59 posted on
01/04/2006 10:48:39 AM PST by
doc30
(Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson