"The Fraud Examined in the BMJ"
There was a study done in Great Britain on ETS (environmental tobacco smoke). This study was done very slowly, methodically, and slowly. It took FORTY YEARS to finish. It finally finished last year, and was published in the reknowned British medical Journal. It concluded there was no great risk being exposed to ETS, and the Dr. that had headed the study even bemoaned the fact that he hated smoking-and wished it were otherwise-BUT-he reported the facts as the study showed, and their findings were true. Proving the outcry over the last 15 years to be false & misleading. What's that you say?? You never heard of this study?? Why...that's because the media in this country (and most others, I would imagine) REFUSED TO REPORT IT!! Yet the media will forever parrot the anti-smoker Taliban's garbage & hate-filled propaganda as gospel, because they hate smokers, too.
posted by Foolkiller at 05:30 P.M. EST on Tue Jun 21, 2005 #
Second Hand Smoke is NOT The Killer The Anti's Want You To Believe. Check out all the studies that have been and are being done on this issue
The whole anti-smoking jihad does not pass the smell test. Consider: 42 years ago when U. S. Surgeon General found a "causal link" between cigarette smoking and lung cancer almost 8 out of 10 Americans smoked. The anti-smoking war began.
Today smoking is not only not socially acceptable it is inconvenient and expensive. Today only about 4 in 10 Americans smoke cigarettes.
Question: has the incidence of lung cancer gone down in proportion to the decline in the number of people smoking?
Answer: No. According to the CDC (Center for Disease Control), even adjusting for population growth, the incidences of lung cancer has gone up.
What will the anti-smoking zealots do now? Will their next jihad be "Light up and prevent lung Cancer."
Perhaps we owe Joe Camel an apology.
The whole anti-smoking jihad does not pass the smell test. Consider: 42 years ago when U. S. Surgeon General found a "causal link" between cigarette smoking and lung cancer almost 8 out of 10 Americans smoked. The anti-smoking war began.
Today smoking is not only not socially acceptable it is inconvenient and expensive. Today only about 4 in 10 Americans smoke cigarettes.
Question: has the incidence of lung cancer gone down in proportion to the decline in the number of people smoking?
Answer: No. According to the CDC (Center for Disease Control), even adjusting for population growth, the incidences of lung cancer has gone up.
What will the anti-smoking zealots do now? Will their next jihad be "Light up and prevent lung Cancer."
Perhaps we owe Joe Camel an apology.
The whole anti-smoking jihad does not pass the smell test. Consider: 42 years ago when U. S. Surgeon General found a "causal link" between cigarette smoking and lung cancer almost 8 out of 10 Americans smoked. The anti-smoking war began.
Today smoking is not only not socially acceptable it is inconvenient and expensive. Today only about 4 in 10 Americans smoke cigarettes.
Question: has the incidence of lung cancer gone down in proportion to the decline in the number of people smoking?
Answer: No. According to the CDC (Center for Disease Control), even adjusting for population growth, the incidences of lung cancer has gone up.
What will the anti-smoking zealots do now? Will their next jihad be "Light up and prevent lung Cancer."
Perhaps we owe Joe Camel an apology.
The whole anti-smoking jihad does not pass the smell test. Consider: 42 years ago when U. S. Surgeon General found a "causal link" between cigarette smoking and lung cancer almost 8 out of 10 Americans smoked. The anti-smoking war began.
Today smoking is not only not socially acceptable it is inconvenient and expensive. Today only about 4 in 10 Americans smoke cigarettes.
Question: has the incidence of lung cancer gone down in proportion to the decline in the number of people smoking?
Answer: No. According to the CDC (Center for Disease Control), even adjusting for population growth, the incidences of lung cancer has gone up.
What will the anti-smoking zealots do now? Will their next jihad be "Light up and prevent lung Cancer."
Perhaps we owe Joe Camel an apology.
The whole anti-smoking jihad does not pass the smell test. Consider: 42 years ago when U. S. Surgeon General found a "causal link" between cigarette smoking and lung cancer almost 8 out of 10 Americans smoked. The anti-smoking war began.
Today smoking is not only not socially acceptable it is inconvenient and expensive. Today only about 4 in 10 Americans smoke cigarettes.
Question: has the incidence of lung cancer gone down in proportion to the decline in the number of people smoking?
Answer: No. According to the CDC (Center for Disease Control), even adjusting for population growth, the incidences of lung cancer has gone up.
What will the anti-smoking zealots do now? Will their next jihad be "Light up and prevent lung Cancer."
Perhaps we owe Joe Camel an apology.
The whole anti-smoking jihad does not pass the smell test. Consider: 42 years ago when U. S. Surgeon General found a "causal link" between cigarette smoking and lung cancer almost 8 out of 10 Americans smoked. The anti-smoking war began.
Today smoking is not only not socially acceptable it is inconvenient and expensive. Today only about 4 in 10 Americans smoke cigarettes.
Question: has the incidence of lung cancer gone down in proportion to the decline in the number of people smoking?
Answer: No. According to the CDC (Center for Disease Control), even adjusting for population growth, the incidences of lung cancer has gone up.
What will the anti-smoking zealots do now? Will their next jihad be "Light up and prevent lung Cancer."
Perhaps we owe Joe Camel an apology.
The whole anti-smoking jihad does not pass the smell test. Consider: 42 years ago when U. S. Surgeon General found a "causal link" between cigarette smoking and lung cancer almost 8 out of 10 Americans smoked. The anti-smoking war began.
Today smoking is not only not socially acceptable it is inconvenient and expensive. Today only about 4 in 10 Americans smoke cigarettes.
Question: has the incidence of lung cancer gone down in proportion to the decline in the number of people smoking?
Answer: No. According to the CDC (Center for Disease Control), even adjusting for population growth, the incidences of lung cancer has gone up.
What will the anti-smoking zealots do now? Will their next jihad be "Light up and prevent lung Cancer."
Perhaps we owe Joe Camel an apology.
The whole anti-smoking jihad does not pass the smell test. Consider: 42 years ago when U. S. Surgeon General found a "causal link" between cigarette smoking and lung cancer almost 8 out of 10 Americans smoked. The anti-smoking war began.
Today smoking is not only not socially acceptable it is inconvenient and expensive. Today only about 4 in 10 Americans smoke cigarettes.
Question: has the incidence of lung cancer gone down in proportion to the decline in the number of people smoking?
Answer: No. According to the CDC (Center for Disease Control), even adjusting for population growth, the incidences of lung cancer has gone up.
What will the anti-smoking zealots do now? Will their next jihad be "Light up and prevent lung Cancer."
Perhaps we owe Joe Camel an apology.
The whole anti-smoking jihad does not pass the smell test. Consider: 42 years ago when U. S. Surgeon General found a "causal link" between cigarette smoking and lung cancer almost 8 out of 10 Americans smoked. The anti-smoking war began.
Today smoking is not only not socially acceptable it is inconvenient and expensive. Today only about 4 in 10 Americans smoke cigarettes.
Question: has the incidence of lung cancer gone down in proportion to the decline in the number of people smoking?
Answer: No. According to the CDC (Center for Disease Control), even adjusting for population growth, the incidences of lung cancer has gone up.
What will the anti-smoking zealots do now? Will their next jihad be "Light up and prevent lung Cancer."
Perhaps we owe Joe Camel an apology.
The whole anti-smoking jihad does not pass the smell test. Consider: 42 years ago when U. S. Surgeon General found a "causal link" between cigarette smoking and lung cancer almost 8 out of 10 Americans smoked. The anti-smoking war began.
Today smoking is not only not socially acceptable it is inconvenient and expensive. Today only about 4 in 10 Americans smoke cigarettes.
Question: has the incidence of lung cancer gone down in proportion to the decline in the number of people smoking?
Answer: No. According to the CDC (Center for Disease Control), even adjusting for population growth, the incidences of lung cancer has gone up.
What will the anti-smoking zealots do now? Will their next jihad be "Light up and prevent lung Cancer."
Perhaps we owe Joe Camel an apology.
The whole anti-smoking jihad does not pass the smell test. Consider: 42 years ago when U. S. Surgeon General found a "causal link" between cigarette smoking and lung cancer almost 8 out of 10 Americans smoked. The anti-smoking war began.
Today smoking is not only not socially acceptable it is inconvenient and expensive. Today only about 4 in 10 Americans smoke cigarettes.
Question: has the incidence of lung cancer gone down in proportion to the decline in the number of people smoking?
Answer: No. According to the CDC (Center for Disease Control), even adjusting for population growth, the incidences of lung cancer has gone up.
What will the anti-smoking zealots do now? Will their next jihad be "Light up and prevent lung Cancer."
Perhaps we owe Joe Camel an apology.
The whole anti-smoking jihad does not pass the smell test. Consider: 42 years ago when U. S. Surgeon General found a "causal link" between cigarette smoking and lung cancer almost 8 out of 10 Americans smoked. The anti-smoking war began.
Today smoking is not only not socially acceptable it is inconvenient and expensive. Today only about 4 in 10 Americans smoke cigarettes.
Question: has the incidence of lung cancer gone down in proportion to the decline in the number of people smoking?
Answer: No. According to the CDC (Center for Disease Control), even adjusting for population growth, the incidences of lung cancer has gone up.
What will the anti-smoking zealots do now? Will their next jihad be "Light up and prevent lung Cancer."
Perhaps we owe Joe Camel an apology.
The whole anti-smoking jihad does not pass the smell test. Consider: 42 years ago when U. S. Surgeon General found a "causal link" between cigarette smoking and lung cancer almost 8 out of 10 Americans smoked. The anti-smoking war began.
Today smoking is not only not socially acceptable it is inconvenient and expensive. Today only about 4 in 10 Americans smoke cigarettes.
Question: has the incidence of lung cancer gone down in proportion to the decline in the number of people smoking?
Answer: No. According to the CDC (Center for Disease Control), even adjusting for population growth, the incidences of lung cancer has gone up.
What will the anti-smoking zealots do now? Will their next jihad be "Light up and prevent lung Cancer."
Perhaps we owe Joe Camel an apology.
Thanks for the ping!