Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Benefited from Abramoff Contributions, Too
CNS News ^ | January 5, 2006 | Melanie Hunter

Posted on 01/05/2006 9:01:06 AM PST by West Coast Conservative

The National Republican Senatorial Committee said Wednesday that 40 of 45 members of the Senate Democrat Caucus have taken money from lobbyist Jack Abramoff, his associates and Indian tribe clients.

Abramoff pled guilty Tuesday to conspiracy, fraud and tax evasion. He also plans to implicate a number of U.S. lawmakers and congressional staffers in a bribery scandal.

Among those named by the NRSC as the worst examples of "Democrat hypocrisy" for taking money from Abramoff and his associates are: Sen. Byron Dorgan, (D-N.D.) who received at least $79,300; Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), who received at least $45,750; Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), who received at least $68,941 and Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.), who received at least $6,250.

Dorgan is among the lawmakers who have already returned campaign donations or given those donations to charity.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; abramoff; congress; democrat; republican; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 01/05/2006 9:01:08 AM PST by West Coast Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
The National Republican Senatorial Committee said Wednesday that 40 of 45 members of the Senate Democrat Caucus have taken money from lobbyist Jack Abramoff, his associates and Indian tribe clients.

This could be a good thing then, eh? Now, considering the source, what does the DNC say about the Senate Republican Caucus?

My thoughts are that there will probably be a backdoor effort to kill this whole thing if there is any real 'bi-partisan blood' to be spilled. Shame ... hopefully we can force it to be public in that case and let the heads role where they are. Time to change 'politics as usual'. However, I doubt it will happen. This will get swept under the rug as we move on to 'more important' things.

2 posted on 01/05/2006 9:05:45 AM PST by AgThorn (Bush is my president, but he needs to protect our borders. FIRST, before any talk of "Amnesty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
This article makes it sound like the Dems listed took bribes when all we know is that they took donations. I understand the desire to minimize th Abrmoff damage but I think we want to used the standard that everyone who accepted a donation from Abrmaoff or his clients is guilty. We might as well just start figuring out how to replace 50 Republican senators if we do that - not to mention it's unfair.
3 posted on 01/05/2006 9:09:07 AM PST by gondramB (If even once you pay danegeld then you never get rid of the Dane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
40 of 45 members of the Senate Democrat Caucus have taken money from lobbyist Jack Abramoff, his associates and Indian tribe clients.

"Taken money" is fairly ambiguous. I would think they are waiting for more fallout to sort out what was known and unknown at the time of the contribution. That's only 89% of the SDC, not everyone.

4 posted on 01/05/2006 9:13:25 AM PST by monkeybrau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

CNS News... I'd be impressed if this was from CBS news...


5 posted on 01/05/2006 9:21:56 AM PST by fhlh (Polls are for strippers and liberal spinsters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Last night on local news, they kept saying "Republican scandal... Republican Lobbyist... Bush campaign contributions..." No mention of any of the democrats that took money from him.

Made me so sick I had to change the channel. How many others did too? I hope at some point they will figure that out.


6 posted on 01/05/2006 9:26:59 AM PST by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Democrats who did not receive money from briber Jack Abramoff would make a shorter list than a list of recipients. Apparently Republicans are right in there getting their share of the plunder.

If the amounts politicians got from Abramoff are multiplied by the number of lobbyists in Washington, no wonder people will spend millions of dollars of their own money to get into Congress.

The average American might wonder why Abramoff could give millions of dollars to Congressmen while the average American can give only $1000?

The whole fraud of being able to give any amount of money to a candidate as long as it is given by a Political Action Committee is a cover-up so that fat cats can buy political favors. It's out in the open, money buys politicians.

Did Abramoff give soft cash or hard cash? LOL.

If there were no lobbyists would there ever be any legislation passed?
7 posted on 01/05/2006 9:27:23 AM PST by R.W.Ratikal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeybrau

I'm thinking the dems might be dirtier than news reports suggest. They have their shills fanning out to all the yelling head shows in large numbers, and they're more shrill than usual. Usually, that means they're trying to divert attention--in this case, perhaps from themselves.


8 posted on 01/05/2006 9:31:25 AM PST by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fhlh

It will be the Bush Administration's Justice Department that acts on Abramoff's testimony as to who he BRIBED. Whether he names Democrats, Republicans or both remains to be seen. The Justice Department has only tipped its hand slightly, leaking the names of Bob Ney, one of his staffers and one Tom DeLay former staffer as subjects of investigations at this point.
Since the government has a thousand or more Abramoff emails and Abramoff and his partner Michael Scanlon are cooperating with federal officials, who took bribes will be revealed.
Accepting campaign contributions is not a crime, even if those contributions were arranged by Abramoff, who was a Bush Pioneer after all.


9 posted on 01/05/2006 9:31:44 AM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

Ney has denied it, and frankly, the DOJ spokeswoman was not very impressive in her announcement the other day, calling him by the wrong name. Makes you wonder if they know who they're talking about!


10 posted on 01/05/2006 9:34:56 AM PST by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

There is a very impressive democrat list being posted, have you seen it?


11 posted on 01/05/2006 9:37:09 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

drive by bookmarking.


12 posted on 01/05/2006 9:39:06 AM PST by Iowa Granny (Wisdom comes with age, but sometimes age comes alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

I think the "bribery" charge will be hard to prove. Abramoff pleaded guilty to "conspiracy to bribe."
This will get blown up by the Democratic Talking Points crowd as a Republican scandal only though. (I wish Zell Miller had dueled with Chris Matthews)


13 posted on 01/05/2006 9:40:22 AM PST by griswold3 (Ken Blackwell, Ohio Governor in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: R.W.Ratikal
If there were no lobbyists would there ever be any legislation passed?

maybe the Congresscritters would have time to actually read the bills they vote on between counting stacks of fiftys.

14 posted on 01/05/2006 9:55:43 AM PST by Rakkasan1 (Peace de Resistance! Viva la Paper towels!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

I am sure all of those returning the funds they received from Abramoff were planning on returning then before they got caught.

When will Hillary pay for the plane she used in her first campaign?


15 posted on 01/05/2006 10:03:59 AM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Dan Rather told me only the Repubs did.


16 posted on 01/05/2006 10:04:16 AM PST by JackDanielsOldNo7 (If it wasn't for marriage, I would not have this screenname.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JackDanielsOldNo7
Dan Rather told me only the Repubs did.

Yeah, and he's got the memo to prove it, too.

17 posted on 01/05/2006 10:10:35 AM PST by talleyman (Kerry & the Surrender-Donkey Treasoncrats - trashing the troops for 40 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1
maybe the Congresscritters would have time to actually read the bills they vote on between counting stacks of fiftys

To be scrupulously fair...I'm certain some "Congresscritters" actually do read the legislative bills, and not just the fifty-dollar bills!! And actually, I don't think we're really talking about secret meetings in smoky back rooms and briefcases stuffed with money changing hands...

Not that that's not a possibility, of course, but it wasn't a GOP politico who ended up in Ft. Marcy (sic) Park...! ;)

18 posted on 01/05/2006 10:22:15 AM PST by 88keys (some things are intriguing to contemplate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: talleyman

LOL--and if he doesn't have the memo yet, Kinkos will deliver it soon!


19 posted on 01/05/2006 10:27:43 AM PST by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
This article makes it sound like the Dems listed took bribes when all we know is that they took donations.

All bribes are called donations.
.
20 posted on 01/05/2006 10:32:02 AM PST by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson