The frogs in Praugue live mainly in the bogs.
The Democrats made a great case in the 1990s about Saddam's dangerous terrorist connections.
But I pointed all of this out, plus the new evidence of terror training camps in Iraq, to a Democrat/Liberal - and all I got back as a response was a string of expletives about how GWB engineered the war for profit.
If I were a betting man I`d bet the farm that during the
run up to the `06 elections we`ll see volumes of evidence
and documentation to bury the extreme left,aka democrat
party.
Bump for later.
Just copy and paste the following after adding < to the beginning and > to the end...
a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1557516/posts">Saddam-Terrorists
Good point here, but I'm surprised he doesn't mention the support the US gave to the Mujihadeen types when they were fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan. This is a perfect example of an unnatural alliance formed against common enemy.
PING
Vigilance & Responsibility Alexander Hamilton’s strategic sobriety.
From time to time, I’ll ping on noteworthy articles about politics, foreign and military affairs. FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.
The man who did the most to publicly deny and obfuscate these connections between Saddam and Atta was none other than George Tenet, Bush's former director of the CIA.
Why Bush kept Tenet on, and continues to keep on hundreds of similar clintonoids in the CIA, FBI, State Department, Pentagon, and maybe even the NSA, is a complete mystery.
Clinton may have been a crook and a traitor, but at least he understood that cleaning out the administration and putting in his own people was job #1.
Tenet stood up day after day before the press and embarrassed the administration by denying any connection between Saddam and the terrorists. Bush just politely smiled and did nothing, for YEARS.
Anyone who thinks the administration is cleverly keeping all this concealed until the midterm elections are near, I have a bridge to sell them. The only thing that is destroying the Democrats is their perpetual habit of going too far and letting themselves go over the top in public. The administration has done relatively little to help themselves.
BTTT
If I recall, the 9/11 commission dismissed the reports of Atta in Prague because his cell phone was in Florida at the time of his alleged meeting. (So the fact that the guy didn't take his cell phone with him, to a place where it probably wouldn't work anyway and where it might give him away is evidence that he couldn't have been in Prague).
I guess I didn't go to Brazil last year, because I didn't take my cell phone with me.
"Nothing to see here folks, move along please."
bump
More here:
Saddam's Documents
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1557201/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1557315/posts
bookmark for later
I think that the President should go on the offensive regarding this Saddam and terrorists very well established connections. He needs to mention this in the State of the Union Address.
Great find!
bttt