Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pakistan 'heavily involved' in Bajaur air strike
Daily Times ^ | January 15, 2006 | By Khalid Hasan

Posted on 01/14/2006 5:18:02 PM PST by Dog

WASHINGTON: The Washington Post has quoted a source as saying that Pakistan was “heavily involved” in the air strikes in Bajaur Agency on Friday.

“This would not have happened without Pakistani involvement,” the Washington Post quoted an unnamed source as saying about the missile attack on the Pak-Afghan border that killed 18 civilians, including women and children.

Earlier reports that Al Qaeda’s second-in-command Ayman al-Zawahiri was among those killed, have been discredited by now.

The same source said that the attack was planned and executed by a combination of Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) officers in Pakistan and Pakistani officials. “This would not have happened unless they had pretty precise information that the right target was at that location,” a US military source told the newspaper. He cautioned, however, that it was possible that Zawahiri got out of the building before it was hit. The source said that US forces, which had been tracking Zawahiri for the past two weeks, will probably know more once the bodies are examined.

A Defence Department official claimed that there were “no coalition military aircraft in the area”.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: airstrikes; alqaedapakistan; alzawahiri; gwot; pakistan; zawahiri
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
Still believe those Pakistani denials?
1 posted on 01/14/2006 5:18:03 PM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone; oceanview; Cap Huff; Coop; nuconvert; Straight Vermonter

Ping!


2 posted on 01/14/2006 5:19:26 PM PST by Dog (When the Boogeyman goes to sleep every night, he checks his closet for Chuck Norris.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Still believe those Pakistani denials?

They were political coverage for the 20-30% of their population that is anti-west.

3 posted on 01/14/2006 5:19:36 PM PST by Wheee The People
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog

Thanks Dog.


4 posted on 01/14/2006 5:19:39 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog

I don't and I have never. I think the US should just put the cards on the table and avoid this bs from Pakistan.


5 posted on 01/14/2006 5:20:12 PM PST by Perdogg ("Facts are stupid things." - President Ronald Wilson Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Still believe those Pakistani denials?

Never believed them in the first place. Is the body count still at 18 civvies, 11 hajji's, and 1 player to be named at a later date?

6 posted on 01/14/2006 5:20:47 PM PST by ARealMothersSonForever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
This was a CIA operation all along. We knew that when the military in Afghanistan denied any knowledge of the raid.

That means the CIA conducted it with specially vetted elements of the Pakistani forces. Most everyone in Pakistan and the US military were out of the loop.

The people talking now are the people who don't know anything.

7 posted on 01/14/2006 5:22:01 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog

the predators have cameras, wouldn't they have seen AZ and his entourage fleeing the building before it was hit?


8 posted on 01/14/2006 5:22:08 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wheee The People; Dog

I agree, Pakistan needed to say what they did, otherwise we risk Musharaff being ousted by the jihadists. Musharaff may not be great, but he is better than the alternative.


9 posted on 01/14/2006 5:23:10 PM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
I think the US should just put the cards on the table and avoid this bs from Pakistan.

I'm sure they're letting the Musharraf administration show some indignation at the hit for their own safety. We really don't need to say anything until the DNA tests come back.

10 posted on 01/14/2006 5:24:16 PM PST by jennyp (PILTDOWN MAN IS REAL! Don't buy the evolutionist's Big Lie that Piltdown was a hoax!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bookmaestro

superping


11 posted on 01/14/2006 5:26:31 PM PST by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dog
A Defence Department official claimed that there were “no coalition military aircraft in the area”.

Heh heh heh...

Wouldn't have to be "in the area". Could have launched missiles from Kandahar, or Diego Garcia for that matter.

12 posted on 01/14/2006 5:26:36 PM PST by adamsjas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adamsjas

not for this one - this was an "up close and personal" airstrike - cameras from the predators monitoring the compound, picking a best time to strike.


13 posted on 01/14/2006 5:30:03 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

but they missed??


14 posted on 01/14/2006 5:30:49 PM PST by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

who says they missed? who even knows if AZ was the target.


15 posted on 01/14/2006 5:32:28 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

From the video looks to me they hit the target....question is was the intended recipent of that calling card in one of those three buildings.


16 posted on 01/14/2006 5:34:14 PM PST by Dog (When the Boogeyman goes to sleep every night, he checks his closet for Chuck Norris.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dog
the Washington Post quoted an unnamed source

The WP "builds" lots of stories using unnamed sources.

Really wish I could have written my college papers without having to cite sources.

17 posted on 01/14/2006 5:34:34 PM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog

So Kerry was there meeting with the President and the CIA was 'bombs away' in another part of Pakistan? Ha! Was Ter-ay-zuh there too?


18 posted on 01/14/2006 5:34:42 PM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
...it was possible that Zawahiri got out of the building before it was hit.

In another thread, one of the natives said they heard aircraft then the explosions. How low are they flying those Predators, anyhoo? Too low if targets on the ground hear them coming.

19 posted on 01/14/2006 5:35:55 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jennyp

> We really don't need to say anything until the
> DNA tests come back.

But even those may not be conclusive if (big if) Debka
is correctly reporting that locals made off with 5
corpses before Pak officials arrived.


20 posted on 01/14/2006 5:35:55 PM PST by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson