Skip to comments.
Endless probe, secret result ($22mil Barrett Report due to be released Thursday, January 19th!)
Yahoo News ^
| 1/12/06
Posted on 01/15/2006 9:28:48 AM PST by Libloather
USA Today piece. Link only.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; 19th; barrett; barrettreport; due; endless; january; probe; released; report; result; secret; thursday
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: penowa
There is some Republican who is dirty on this one
Good guess. How unfortunate.
To: Mo1
I do not understand the delays and secrecy surrounding this report.
22
posted on
01/15/2006 10:39:34 AM PST
by
Peach
To: coloradan
what ever the report says, you can bet it will be a cover up just like what Starr and the guy who took his place did. It will get hardly an air play. If this was about a republican, we all know it would get tons of air play, but this is about QUEEN HILLARY and Jester Bill. They will bury it like bill buried his cigar in Monica's humidor. The corrupt elite will get away with it again.
23
posted on
01/15/2006 10:47:05 AM PST
by
MAD-AS-HELL
(Put a mirror to the face of the republican party and all you'll see is a Donkey.)
To: MAD-AS-HELL
24
posted on
01/15/2006 12:47:41 PM PST
by
Huevos Rancheros
(Free the Barret Report--William B. Travis)
To: Libloather
Everyone knows why this is being done and whom it is protecting. This outrage is being done in broad daylight. Can anyone say Kitty Genovese?
25
posted on
01/15/2006 12:49:44 PM PST
by
doug from upland
(NEW YORK TIMES -- traitorous b*st*rds)
To: Peach
My guess is it catches both parties. That's the only thing that makes any sense.
L
26
posted on
01/15/2006 12:50:48 PM PST
by
Lurker
(You don't let a pack of wolves into the house just because they're related to the family dog.)
To: Libloather; doug from upland; Calpernia; Cindy; Alamo-Girl; backhoe; bd476
In before the ZOT Wite-out....
27
posted on
01/15/2006 4:20:35 PM PST
by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
To: Blurblogger
Thanks for the ping Blublogger.
That was interesting.
28
posted on
01/15/2006 4:25:56 PM PST
by
Cindy
To: Libloather; All
Does anyone know if the redactions, suppression, etc. can be legally challenged?
Aren't we the people entitled to know that the clintons abused their power and sicced the IRS on the opposition?
If it can be shown that the purpose of the redactions were the concealment of clinton abuse of power and other clinton crimes, would the restrictions hold?
And was it really malpractice, i.e., stupidity, on the right that allowed this to happen? Or was it malfeasance?
29
posted on
01/15/2006 5:05:37 PM PST
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Blurblogger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson