Posted on 01/15/2006 4:00:20 PM PST by armydawg1
What about other charges?
You backed up your statement that I'm emotional? Hardly. I've been pretty clear I'm not emotional about the issue but about the name calling by someone who thinks he saved the country.
Who said I don't want to be on the thread? Now you're just making stuff up.
Really? You really believe that? Somehow I doubt it.
Believe what?
Why does it bother me so much?
Because you are trying to silence the debate amoung those vet here discussing it, if you truly believe that only Vets should be discussing this, then why the push to prevent that from happening by saying it shouldn't happen at all.
See the logic,
you say want vets to do it
but you say don't want vets to discuss it
and you say republicans should not discuss it
or be a part of it all
because according to you and yours Muthra is a senile old man and republicans will be seen by the liberals as mean spirited if we did attack him.
I got news for you, the liberals hate us anyway and don't need any reasons to think we are mean spirited.
Any attack on anything Muthra says is automatically condemned by the liberals anyway, so what is your solution if you have one?
Other charges, almost impossible, but we can dream.
What a way to not answer the question. Believe what?
And who says I don't want to be on the thread. You're not making sense. Which is why I didn't answer your original question to me on this thread. It made NO sense.
You have simply just got to be shi**in' me........
Pssst. Here's a hint. And here's how I know there's a problem with your reading comprehension.
You just said that "you say want vets to do it
but you say don't want vets to discuss it
".
Which part of my posts that say the veterans SHOULD handle it and leave the Republicans out of it don't you understand?
The rest of your nonsense post I just ignored.
>>>Other charges, almost impossible, but we can dream.
Now this is what I want to know. Why is it a dream?
When you are done arguing about why we should be discussing this....Ping me back. This is worth discussing!
I read that, and saved it, to discuss it with a friend.
Heck of a piece.
"You would allow him to continue to spout off so that he can be ignored."
Dang, I feel like I'm in a deja vu'. Didn't America go down this road already?
I said that you said that you want vets to handle it.
The Vets here are discussing it and you are trying to prevent any discussion of it by saying that republicans should stay way from it.
Your point being that if a Vet is a "good" republican they will do nothing about Muthra for fear of embarassing the party.
Ergo you are trying to prevent what you are saying you want to happen I.E. Vets doing anything about Muthra.
See how hard it is to explain to you, your own words, even you don't know what you are saying.
In my mind, loyalty to the Party above all else, is a sure sign that the person making such a restriction on others is beyond the shadow any doubt a liberal.
For the simple reason that most republicans don't believe in such union thug/commissar/mafioso tactics of loyalty, republicans are loyal to conservative ideas and not to the party.
OMG.
Wow - that famous "logic" of yours just got a big fat "F".
1. There is NOWHERE that I've said if a vet is a good Republican, they will do nothing for fear of embarrassing the party. That's a flat out lie. Or else you're reading comprehension is even worse than I thought.
2. I've said that veterans should handle it but the Republican party needs to stay far away from it. If that stifles the veterans so much that they are afraid to debate it here, they really are weenies, aren't they?
3. Honey, you need a good night's sleep and try again in the morning. That was a pathetic attempt. Just pathetic.
It's implied in every time you've said that republicans should do nothing about Muthra.
I've made my case and proved it as well.
LOL. In your mind, hon. In your mind.
If you see no difference between the Republican party and veterans, shame on you.
That famous logic you've talked about is sadly lacking. Maybe tomorrow you'll feel fresher.
Are you honestly reading what you are typing?
"I've said that veterans should handle it but the Republican party needs to stay far away from it. If that stifles the veterans so much that they are afraid to debate it here, they really are weenies, aren't they?"
pathetic weenies ARE NOT afraid to debate it here.
the arguements with tonk and usmcobra are "stifling the veterans", etc., would WOULD like to discuss it.
move on.
would=who
Which part of the Republican party should stay far away from this don't you get? Are you saying that veterans groups have a big (R) behind their names?
Because you know that's not the case. How much more clear can I be? Veterans should go for it. And leave Republicans (groups, organizations with an R after it) out of it.
Which part of that don't you get?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.