Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Arlen big-noting again, or Arlen undermining the President?
1 posted on 01/15/2006 4:15:02 PM PST by Aussie Dasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Aussie Dasher
I don't see any talk about impeachment here

Oh puhlease!!!  Has there been a day since he was elected that this wasn't mentioned?

3 posted on 01/15/2006 4:19:41 PM PST by softwarecreator (Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

Surely Sen. Specter, there must be some obscure Scottish Law which allows this. Besides, take the Attorney General to task over this, he's the one who gave the go-ahead and said it was legal.


5 posted on 01/15/2006 4:33:31 PM PST by moonman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

Arlen doing what he does best.

Getting himself more face time.


8 posted on 01/15/2006 4:45:50 PM PST by airborne (If being a Christian was a crime, would there be enough evidence to convict you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

Just one more volley in the never ending struggle between the legislative and the executive. The three branches are designed to be equal, but the judiciary and congress consider themselves more equal than the executive branch. It is time both are forced to swallow the big reality pill that G.W. has prepared for them.

Specter? He is a disloyal, egoist bastard that forgets who brought him to the dance. That last statement is my entry into the obvious understatement of the day award. Snarlin' is no different than any other of the arrogant pricks that plague us all.


9 posted on 01/15/2006 4:47:44 PM PST by thelastvirgil ("When the roll is called in congress, they don't know whether to answer 'present' or 'not guilty'.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

The hearing before the Judiciary Committee should be a hoot since they can only discuss the law and Constitution as it would apply to hypotheticals since the Judiciary Committee does not have the security clearance to discuss the facts. I don't think they can even call anybody from the NSA or CIA and ask them questions (at least in open session) as to what was done.

Gonzalez should explain the law to Spincter in terms the Senator can understand by citing some obscure Scottish law.


11 posted on 01/15/2006 5:08:48 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

A blank check from Abramoff is perfectly acceptable, however...


14 posted on 01/15/2006 5:13:45 PM PST by TADSLOS (Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher
I can't wait for the likes of Kennedy, Biden, Feinswine and Schumer to strut their stuff again on live TV. It should be as entertaining as watching them make complete asses of themselves with Judge Alito, but this time they will be sticking up for the likes of Al Qaida and Bin Laden instead of NARAL and Ralph Neas.

This will be good. Please pass the popcorn!

15 posted on 01/15/2006 5:26:01 PM PST by Gritty ("Islam us a universal ideology that leads the world to justice"-Ahmadinejad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

Talk down around the pool hall is that there is an obscure Scottish law that requires the release of the Barrett report. Suck on that, Spec.


16 posted on 01/15/2006 5:42:49 PM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher
Arlen's a deal cutter. My hunch is that W campaigned for him in his last senate run in return for clearing the way for the USSC candidates. But Arlen is talking large before the last deal is done. Can't he stay bought or is there another something else to be done?
17 posted on 01/15/2006 5:47:31 PM PST by Thebaddog (K9 4ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

<< Arlen big-noting again, or Arlen undermining the President? >>

Snarlin' Arlen is a "Democrat" of the "former" variety.

A RINO, that is, who was a self-serving crook when he "used to be" a "Democrat" and has consistently been a self serving RINO crook ever since!

And is of course indistinguishable from any other "former" [RINO] "Democrat" and is as ever undermining the president.


20 posted on 01/15/2006 6:59:04 PM PST by Brian Allen (How arrogant are we to believe our career political-power-lusting lumpen somehow superior to theirs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

Guess what, Arlen. You don't have a say in the matter. Investigate all you like, but it won't mean anything because, at the end of the day, you are powerless on this issue.


22 posted on 01/15/2006 7:28:41 PM PST by dinoparty (In the beginning was the Word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

Sorry but if Bush should be impeached for anything, it should be for supporting that scumbag Specter!


23 posted on 01/15/2006 7:59:54 PM PST by Bommer (Ted Kenndy - Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

cBS radio rolled out Al Gore today, to speak about this, in a spot I heard while driving.

He was just about screaming about how corrupt Bush has been.

I also noted cBS didn't have time for any other viewpoint on the matter.


31 posted on 01/16/2006 1:38:54 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher
"we're not going to give him a blank check, and just because we're of the same party doesn't mean we're not going to look at this very closely."

NO one thinks the president should have a "blank check" on spying, including the president.

Bush was a FOOL to support Specter over Toomey. What a traitorous pain in the butt Specter is.

32 posted on 01/16/2006 5:28:27 PM PST by TAdams8591 (The first amendment does NOT protect vulgar and obscene speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

34 posted on 01/16/2006 8:33:34 PM PST by End_Clintonism_Now (MONEY IS THE ROOT OF ALL CLINTON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson