Oh puhlease!!! Has there been a day since he was elected that this wasn't mentioned?
Surely Sen. Specter, there must be some obscure Scottish Law which allows this. Besides, take the Attorney General to task over this, he's the one who gave the go-ahead and said it was legal.
Arlen doing what he does best.
Getting himself more face time.
Just one more volley in the never ending struggle between the legislative and the executive. The three branches are designed to be equal, but the judiciary and congress consider themselves more equal than the executive branch. It is time both are forced to swallow the big reality pill that G.W. has prepared for them.
Specter? He is a disloyal, egoist bastard that forgets who brought him to the dance. That last statement is my entry into the obvious understatement of the day award. Snarlin' is no different than any other of the arrogant pricks that plague us all.
The hearing before the Judiciary Committee should be a hoot since they can only discuss the law and Constitution as it would apply to hypotheticals since the Judiciary Committee does not have the security clearance to discuss the facts. I don't think they can even call anybody from the NSA or CIA and ask them questions (at least in open session) as to what was done.
Gonzalez should explain the law to Spincter in terms the Senator can understand by citing some obscure Scottish law.
A blank check from Abramoff is perfectly acceptable, however...
This will be good. Please pass the popcorn!
Talk down around the pool hall is that there is an obscure Scottish law that requires the release of the Barrett report. Suck on that, Spec.
<< Arlen big-noting again, or Arlen undermining the President? >>
Snarlin' Arlen is a "Democrat" of the "former" variety.
A RINO, that is, who was a self-serving crook when he "used to be" a "Democrat" and has consistently been a self serving RINO crook ever since!
And is of course indistinguishable from any other "former" [RINO] "Democrat" and is as ever undermining the president.
Guess what, Arlen. You don't have a say in the matter. Investigate all you like, but it won't mean anything because, at the end of the day, you are powerless on this issue.
Sorry but if Bush should be impeached for anything, it should be for supporting that scumbag Specter!
cBS radio rolled out Al Gore today, to speak about this, in a spot I heard while driving.
He was just about screaming about how corrupt Bush has been.
I also noted cBS didn't have time for any other viewpoint on the matter.
NO one thinks the president should have a "blank check" on spying, including the president.
Bush was a FOOL to support Specter over Toomey. What a traitorous pain in the butt Specter is.