Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman

Perhaps you're right, but I don't think so. Radiocarbon dating (that began post WWII) is what got Clovis dates accepted; Leakey's visit was circa 1930.


25 posted on 01/17/2006 8:59:18 PM PST by SunkenCiv (In the long run, there is only the short run.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv
Perhaps you're right, but I don't think so. Radiocarbon dating (that began post WWII) is what got Clovis dates accepted; Leakey's visit was circa 1930.

Leakey didn't do Calico until the late 1960s. Calico didn't even start up until 1964. There were radiocarbon dates in the western US much older, at that point, than 3,000 years.

Source

26 posted on 01/17/2006 9:08:02 PM PST by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson