Posted on 01/18/2006 11:07:58 AM PST by areafiftyone
Court nominee Samuel Alito has the confirmation vote of at least one Senate Democrat but several other Democrats said Wednesday they had lingering questions about the nominee and will vote against him.
Before Senate Democrats met to discuss the nomination, Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., emerged from a morning meeting with Alito and said he would vote against President Bush's Supreme Court nominee as too far outside the mainstream of judicial thinking.
"He's just not right for Montana, he's just not right for America," Baucus said. "He's very polished and he answered all of the questions I was going to ask. There is just a little too much inconsistency."
Baucus said he is concerned that Alito leans toward giving too much power to the executive branch and has wavered on the right to privacy. He said he was also concerned about Alito's membership in Concerned Alumni of Princeton, which discouraged the admission of women and minorities at the Ivy League school.
Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., also said she would vote against Alito. "I have a lot of unanswered questions," Mikulski told reporters after attending the swearing-in of new Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J. Alito's eventual confirmation appears assured. The Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to vote next Tuesday on Alito's nomination to replace Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who often casts the swing vote on controversial cases. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., has announced that debate on the nomination will begin in the full Senate on Jan. 25.
Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska, one of the most conservative Democrats in Congress, announced Tuesday in a statement that he had made up his mind to support Alito "because of his impeccable judicial credentials, the American Bar Association's strong recommendation and his pledge that he would not bring a political agenda to the court."
All 10 Republicans on the panel have endorsed Alito, assuring him of approval even though most of the eight committee Democrats are expected to oppose his confirmation.
Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., was expected to officially announce his position on Alito in a speech to Georgetown University on Thursday. Leahy and two other committee Democrats - Russ Feingold and Herb Kohl, both of Wisconsin - voted for now-Chief Justice John Roberts' confirmation.
Alito is meeting several senators over the next couple of days, including Menendez and Republican Sen. John Warner of Virginia on Thursday. Menendez has not said how he'll vote on Alito, while Warner said Thursday that he "fully expects" to vote for his confirmation. Nelson, who is seeking re-election this fall in his Republican state, said in his statement that he has "supported more than 215 of President Bush's nominations to the federal bench, including Chief Justice John Roberts."
How in the world does Baucus keep getting elected in Montana?
I sure Mikulski has said many a no to men.
Mrs. BM said No. Darn it.
LOL With the DUers calling each and every Democrat Senator's office the Senators must be quaking in their boots for fear of losing votes.
A lie repeated often enough.....
Menendez on the hot seat. Alito is well liked in NJ.
I have been rather curious how it is that the Libs have all but owned the upper mountains states, myself.
Good. Then I don't need to reconsider my support of him...
Probably not as many times as men have said "no" to her. Not enough beer in the whole world!
The sheep like him.
Pork. It's what's for re-election.
I wonder that myself. Is there anybody with half a brain up there?
That's what I figured, even though his political positions seem at odds with the way most Montanans think. Well, it finally caught up with Daschle, maybe Baucus is next.
I have the feeling the dems will fillibuster Alito. Hell, Bacus is still citing to an article that has proven to be satire. They don't let the facts get in the way, they just craft their own reality and run with it.
Being a member of a group 30 years ago is enough to vote against someone? It is not like this group was the KKK.
apparently a number of "brokeback mountain" types in Montana if this yahoo gets elected there
Good, that's Demo-rat speak for "he's a good, solid family man with strong Christian values and will vote against Roe".
He answered the questions, eh? Well, we can't have that!
LOL! I think that may be the other way around.
The correct conformation margin is 60-40. A vote of 61-39 would indicate that we could have nominated a guy who was slightly more of a Constitutionalist.
Is he up for re-election?
EWWWWWW my eyes!!!!!!
I think he won in 2002, so not until 2008.
Which 'Rats have already announced their no vote for Alito?
For example, would the voters still love me if I got a face transplant?
He'll ham and haw, but in the end he'll cave to the party's demands like a good little DimWit...
Dims own this flippin State thanks to our fellows up North!
R3
That's hilarious. Looks like the recording session for "We Are The World." Kerry looks smashing in his bunny suit, and Ted just looks smashed period.
I am going to disagree on the filibuster as they know that they will lose it if they try.
Alito will have a filibuster proof vote. We knew that Mikulski would vote no. Why is Ben Nelson saying this morning that he will vote yes?
Answer- because he will get in trouble with his constituents if he votes no.
Even Sheets Byrd will vote yes. He has to or he risks his reelection
LOL! Or would they love her more with a ski mask?
HEM and haw!!!
Whew, at least it woulda passed spellcheck anyway!
R3
Max Bogus is an idiot
Yeah that IS what we call that jackass up here.
It is much easier to count the rats who will vote for Alito. I have not heard any come forth....unless you count Specter ?!?
Big Sky ping!
He has lock on the cattle vote.
Senator Mikulski has "a lot of unanswered questions"
No kidding. She still hasn't answered MY question to her office about why she wasn't embarrassed by Al Gore's campaign tossing military ballots in FL in the 2000 election.
Just this morning KCFW aired a segment on Schweitzer-D, governor of Montana, for President in 08. They followed this with a Abramoff story and the current republican scandal attached to him.
What republican scandal?
"he's just not right for America..."
That didn't stop Max and Barbara.
These are the 'Rats who voted NO for Roberts:
Maria Cantwell of Washington
Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey
Debbie Stabenow of Michigan
Dick Durbin of Illinois
Jon Corzine of New Jersey
Paul Sarbanes of Maryland
Barack Obama of Illinois
Daniel Akaka of Hawaii
Mark Dayton of Minnesota
Evan Bayh of Indiana
Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York
Dianne Feinstein of California
Joseph Biden of Delaware
John Kerry of Massachusetts
Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts
Jack Reed of Rhode Island
Daniel Inouye of Hawaii
Barbara Mikulski of Maryland
Harry Reid of Nevada
Charles Schumer of New York
Tom Harkin of Iowa
Barbara Boxer of California
They conveniently cut out the last part of that statement, which read "...on my part."
The lie: Concerned Alumni of Princeton, which discouraged the admission of women and minorities at the Ivy League school.
The truth: The Concerned Alumni of Princeton opposed lowering of admissions standards to meet quotas.
I'm sure many men said no to Mikulski!!!!
So far only those two. More will be announcing their votes this afternoon. Of course we can count on NO VOTES from Kennedy, Clinton, Kerry, Osama er um I mean Obama and Boxer etc.
Must be all those shepherds.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.