Posted on 01/19/2006 8:46:42 AM PST by mondonico
Here it is:
"This report, in the end, demonstrates the need for public officials to tell the truth and perform honest services."
That verbage cost us about $10M.
What a joke.
It's being said it takes only one congressman to release the entire report?
So who is the "one" without corruption and/or is implicated? Let him come forth and show us the report..meanhile roll the cricket chirping audio loop.
Guess your analogy stands...sad reality
My email:
Dear Congressman Wicker
Please request and provide to me the UNredacted full version of the Final Report of the Independent Counsel in re: Henry G. Cisneros AKA the Barrett Report. It is outrageous that we taxpayers are prevented from seeing a report that we paid for.
Although, a three-judge panel consisting of Judges David Sentelle, Thomas Reavley and Peter Fay redacted the information and ruled that no one may see them, there is said to be an exception to their ruling. Any member of Congress may view the redactions by asking to do so and may then share the information with the American public. I request that you ask for this information and release it to me.
The same request will be sent to Senators Lott and Cochran.
It's the Cisneros OIC report.
Yep. Made in december supposedly. Al Jazeera working with the lefties in our country.
But will any senator or House member do it? Nobody is interested in further prosecution of Henry Cisneros, an exceptional public figure who might well have become the first Hispanic-American governor of Texas and perhaps even president of the United States. Rather, an unredacted Barrett report is an opportunity to observe how the Internal Revenue Service decides when to prosecute, a place where Congress until now has feared to venture.
"It's the Cisneros OIC report."
Yes, but it's often the Barrett Report, like the Starr Report.
Would you post those extraneous language links over here if you get a chance?
I understand that, but a lot of people had no idea what this was. I was just throwing it in for those wondering 'why all the hullaballoo'?
I wouldn't bet on it.
Carolyn
At least they nailed Scooter! /sarcasm
I don't suppose they will put it out in book form like the 911 report.
All people sin. It's a human condition. The question is, among us sinners, who is most fit to lead? That is a perplexing question. But just as a boss needs to choose a worker out of the crowd, we need to choose someone to vote for. You, at least, are far more informed than most. Don't be scared of making a mistake. Just choose the best way you can. I'd rather you share with others why you make such a choice. But if that's too much hassle, fine. Just vote and pray that God guides you.
Yawn
Thanks
Raise another glass, Mr. Barrett.
"Initially, the panel of three judges that oversees the lingering issues involving the independent counsel law agreed in October to the public release of Mr. Barrett's report but said the section with accusations about Clinton officials must be deleted.
But after Congressional Republicans attached a rider to a Department of Housing and Urban Development spending bill requiring publication of the full report, the judicial panel in November ordered a full disclosure."
25 posted on 01/19/2006 11:59:25 AM CST by maggief
To: mewzilla
http://appropriations.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressReleases.Detail&PressRelease_id=529&Month=11&Year=2005
* Requires the Cisneros Independent Counsel to issue a report 90 days after enactment of the bill.
http://appropriations.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=AboutTheCommittee.MemberList&SubcommitteeId=18
38 posted on 01/19/2006 12:41:53 PM CST by maggief
To: maggief
Thanks! Good info!
And check this out. From this May 3, 2005 link:
n Independent Counsel—Drops extraneous language related to Independent Counsel’s investigation of former Secretary Henry Cisneros.
Wonder what that was all about?
39 posted on 01/19/2006 12:45:15 PM CST by mewzilla
To: mewzilla
Added by the Senate???
http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:fe0iCoM3J0gJ:www.house.gov/pence/rsc/doc/FY05%2520Iraq-Tsunami%2520Supplemental%25202.pdf+extraneous+language+Independent+Counsel%E2%80%94+Henry+Cisneros.&hl=en&client=firefox-a
Independent Counsel
The bill drops extraneous language added by the Senate related to
Independent Counsel s investigation of former Secretary Henry Cisneros
40 posted on 01/19/2006 12:55:01 PM CST by maggief
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1560740/posts
Link in your post #39:
http://appropriations.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressReleases.Detail&PressRelease_id=468&Month=5&Year=2005
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.