"but they might have kept us from murdering even more Iraqi civilians" Isn't this a new lowfor Newsweek and the MSM in general. I think it reveals just how deep the hatred for America runs in the newsrooms of the Main Stream media.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: Jonah Johansen
"But the only record Ive come across of a successful assassination by Predator was in Yemen in November 2002 when six suspected Al Qaeda terrorists youd mostly never heard of were blown to smithereens."
What!?!?! This strike whacked Abu Ali al-Harithi, who was the "mastermind" of the U.S.S. Cole bombing. A big fish and an honor killing - American style. What really got under the liberals' skins about this hit was that it occurred just before the mid-term 2002 elections and, quite possibly, helped the Republicans at the polls.
30 posted on
01/19/2006 10:57:22 AM PST by
Airborne1986
(Well, you can do what you want to us. But we're not going to sit here while you badmouth the U.S.A.)
To: Jonah Johansen
This is the sort of poorly written and irresponsible screed one expects from The Daily Worker or something of that ilk.
To: Jonah Johansen
Interesting that Dick-ey came up with this article as our favorite hatemonger, Ted Rall, wrote an article this week calling the drone attacks "assassination by joystick". Little Ted also downplayed the Sept 11 attacks saying "they could have been a lot worse".
http://newsbusters.org/node/3646
32 posted on
01/19/2006 11:10:37 AM PST by
Chickenhawk Warmonger
(Join the chickenhawk express at www.chickenhawkexpress.blogspot.com)
To: Jonah Johansen
Washingtons enthusiasm for remote-control assassination is partly about boys with toys. But after disasters like the failed attempt on Zawahiri, ... - Chrisopher Dickey Asked about the significance of bin Ladens message, Dean (Howard Dean) acknowledged that the recent attacks in Pakistan that killed four top al Qaeda leaders were probably useful.
Disarray on the left? ; )
40 posted on
01/19/2006 12:23:35 PM PST by
TigersEye
(I learned all I need to know about Islam on 9/11/01!)
To: Jonah Johansen
To: Jonah Johansen
Three words:
Clinton.
Tomahawks.
Afghanistan.
How easily they forget when it doesn't suit their cause.
45 posted on
01/19/2006 2:32:41 PM PST by
usmcobra
(Liberal=progressive...Conservative="Retro?" That's way cooler than being just a Neo-con!)
To: Jonah Johansen
The United States is in more danger from domestic traitors than from any foreign terrorists whatever.
That said, I don't think "News Weak" is exactly treasonous so much as being one of the tiredest, oldest examples of the tired, old woodpulp media.
That said:
Way to go Predator Teams. We're impressed with your work and for one of the very few times we can say with pride that our tax dollars were well spent on training and equipping your elegant systems. Just Wow!
48 posted on
01/19/2006 3:45:57 PM PST by
NaughtiusMaximus
(DO NOT read to the end of this tagline . . . Oh, $#@%^, there you went and did it.)
To: Jonah Johansen
"But after disasters like the failed attempt on Zawahiri"
We only need to read this sentence fragment to know Christopher D-head is a first-class moron. He has no idea whether or not we really got Zawahiri, and certainly no idea whether or not other key terrorist leaders were present or supposed to be present. Whether or not we got Zawahiri (and it's far from conclusive that we did not), it's been coming out that we very likely nailed 4-5 major Al Qaeda figures, including their latest #3 (Operations Commander) and their chief bombmaker. Unless the recent statements coming out of Pakistan are proved wrong, this was a HUGELY successful and valuable mission. Also, we can't begin to think that the public or journalists right now really know ANYTHING about the facts of this strike.... until we know what happened with the bodies, whether Al Qaeda was able to hide them away, whether there were wounded survivors, etc. we can't begin to assess the value of this raid. Also, no such attacks can ever be 100% guaranteed successes -- it is weasels like Chris Dickey that have long kept us from even attempting many things we need to do against terrorists. If our policy is "we will not act without 100% knowledge and 100% certainty of success" then of course we can't act. That's what leftist weasels like Dickey and Newsweak editors are always striving for, to tie us down like Gulliver. We can't possibly limit ourselves to playing pattycake, or to solely going after Bin Laden and Zawahiri, Mr. Dickey is an imbecile and a dangerous fool.
49 posted on
01/19/2006 6:40:08 PM PST by
Enchante
(Democrats: "We are ALL broken and worn out, our party & ideas, what else is new?")
To: Jonah Johansen
MSNBC and NEWSWEAK truly hate America.
50 posted on
01/19/2006 6:55:08 PM PST by
2111USMC
To: Jonah Johansen
MSNBC and NEWSWEAK truly hate America.
51 posted on
01/19/2006 6:55:18 PM PST by
2111USMC
To: Jonah Johansen
MSNBC and NEWSWEAK truly hate America.
52 posted on
01/19/2006 6:55:27 PM PST by
2111USMC
To: Jonah Johansen
How are their subscriptions doing lately? My hubby got a gift subscription to it a few years ago. We used it to start up the woodstove!
54 posted on
01/19/2006 10:01:35 PM PST by
Just Lori
(Oh my soul, be prepared to meet Him who knows how to ask questions.)
To: Jonah Johansen
Wonder when we can expect an apology from Newsweak for the fraudulent Flush the Koran story that has gotten a lot more then 18 people killed? Absurd for people who have that much American blood on their hands to have the arrogance to lecture anyone about ANYTHING ever again. BTW, now that it has been confirmed that 3 of the 5 top leaders of Al Qeda were killed in this strike, when will Newsweak apologise for this Al Qeda propaganda piece?
55 posted on
01/22/2006 10:12:22 AM PST by
MNJohnnie
(Is there a satire god who created Al Gore for the sole purpose of making us laugh?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson