Posted on 01/21/2006 7:46:09 AM PST by goldstategop
The Ceaucescu moment in Paul Martin's short, disgraceful career as prime minister, the instant it was clear the jig was well and truly up, occurred not this year but last; not during the long, slow humiliation of the present election campaign, but in his hour of maximum triumph, perhaps the finest achievement of his premiership: the luring of Belinda Stronach, by means of a Cabinet bauble or two, into the Liberal fold.
You remember: the press conference, a nervous Ms. Stronach, a beaming prime minister. Someone asks about the political impact of her defection, just days before that crucial vote of non-confidence (the one he'd promised to respect, as opposed to the several he'd ignored). Mr. Martin replies, briskly, as if announcing the time: This has nothing to do with politics ....
And every last person in the room laughed in his face.
Readers of this column will know that I have waffled on Mr. Martin over the years. I think we all did. I was never terribly keen on him, when virtually the entire press gallery thought he walked on water. But neither did I join in the instant chorus of abuse that descended on him in those first hesitant months as prime minister. I thought he deserved credit for licking the deficit, when others tried to minimize it, and I thought he deserved a chance to show whether he was "one of the good guys," even after his dissembling response to the Auditor-General's report that kicked off the sponsorship scandal.
So you will perhaps forgive me when I say that if this election has no other result, if it achieves no other end, but to send Mr. Martin far, far out to sea, it will be enough. Him, and the thugs in his entourage. Changing the government is just a bonus.
I used to look upon the defeat of the Liberals as a grim necessity. I used to believe that Mr. Martin should be held to account for failing to act before, during or after the fact, but that in essence he and his government would have to pay for the sins of his predecessor. Not even the serial fiascos that marked his time in office -- the health care giveaway, the equalization mess, the asymmetric federalism debacle, the missile defence fumble, the three budgets in two weeks, the attempted bribery of opposition MPs, the defiance of Parliament and of constitutional convention in the face of four consecutive non-confidence votes -- could make the defeat of his government more than a professional responsibility.
But the campaign that he and his minions have waged over the last eight weeks -- by turns empty, dishonest, hysterical, vicious, crude, demagogic, shrill, incoherent, divisive, xenophobic, hypocritical, not to say staggeringly incompetent -- makes his impending departure from the scene a positive delight. I am literally counting the hours.
There has never been a campaign to match it -- not even the loathsome campaign the same team mounted in 2004. John Turner's 1988 campaign, with its litany of the biblical horrors that free trade would bring in its wake, was as over the top -- but that was about an issue. If it conjured up extreme and absurd scenarios, they were at least attached to something the Tories had actually proposed. They did not consist, as in the present campaign, of simply fantasizing, with almost pornographic relish, of all the things they might do.
It will be recorded that in this election, the Martin campaign commissioned, produced and ran ads (at public expense) suggesting that his opponent was, inter alia, plotting with separatists to destroy the country, bankrolled by extremist elements of a foreign power, and in a glittering tour de force, bent on imposing martial law. ("In our cities.") It will further be recorded that when called out on that last bit of filth, Mr. Martin claimed -- without flinching at the utter implausibility of what he was saying -- that he was just making a point about logistics.
And, to our eternal credit, every last person in the country laughed in his face.
CODA: The most stinging indictment of Mr. Martin cannot come from my poor pen, but from his peers, old warhorses like John Crosbie and Ed Broadbent, who have seen elections come and go and been on both ends of a political punch. It is fair to say they are revolted by what they have witnessed. Here are the less scatological parts of Mr. Crosbie's assessment, as it appeared in this paper: "I was active in politics for 27 years, 10 as a provincial elected member and 17 as a federally elected member, and I've been interested and involved in it all my life. This is certainly the worst behaviour I have seen of any party leader."
As for Mr. Broadbent, here he is in his farewell press conference: "The Liberal campaign has been deeply offensive. Offensive to women, offensive to workers, offensive to members of the armed forces, and offensive to all Canadians."
That's a Tory and a New Democrat. I was hoping to find a Liberal, but I guess it will have to wait until after the election.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
It's good to see Belinda Stronach's political fortunes sagging.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
"And every last person in the room laughed in his face."
That must have been sweet - but was it reported at the time.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
Seems their liberals are trained by our Dimocrat party.
Just straightfaced lie to the camera and deny/qualify later. And just cross your fingers that the MSM picks it and repeats it often enough so that everyone thinks it is true.
ADSCAM: Click the picture-
Go to "comments," go to "last," and work back for the latest links, quotes, quips, charts, and other useful information about the upcoming Canadian elections.
The Canadian Blogs have led the way investigating, exposing, talking about, and keeping before the public the "scandal a day" nature of Canada's corrupt, incestuous, nepotistic ruling class.
You really need to read all of it to see how bad 13 years of "liberal" government can be.
Billions of dollars missing... censorship... gang warfare ( but you can't mention that... see "censorship..." ) and corruption, cronyism, and kickbacks that would shame a Mafiosa...
Read it all, get sick, get mad- and if you are Canadian, go vote.
Be sure to visit our Sister Site, Free Dominion:
And the Liberal campaign was offensive to other nationals watching from outside. The idea that a Canada as created in the image of the Liberals is morally superior and an example for the rest of the world to follow is as immoral as it gets. The self-righteous condemnation of a nation that rebuilt Europe after World War 2, that reshaped a militaristic Japan into a model of peace and democracy, that removed Saddam Hussein from office, and that will be called upon to deal with the situation in Iran when all else fails, is as disgraceful as it gets.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.