Posted on 01/21/2006 1:04:57 PM PST by heckler
January 22, 2006 What Would Jack Bauer Do? By Pat Buchanan
Ex-President Palmer had saved Jack Bauer's life. Yet, the "military option" against Iran is the talk of the town.
The Chinese wanted agent Bauer extradited to execute him for the killing of their Los Angeles consul, gunned down in a crossfire between Chinese security and Bauer's Counter-Terrorism Unit team that had penetrated the consulate on an espionage mission.
Palmer, though out of office, conspired in a CTU scheme where Jack would appear dead, to the satisfaction of the duped Chinese, and be sent to Mexico with a fake identity.
As this year's series of Fox's "24" opened Sunday, President Palmer is shot through an office window and assassinated. Word reaches Bauer, working in the California oil patch.
Emotional at the death of the president he loved, for whom he had often risked his life, Jack returns. He is intercepted and almost killed by the team that murdered Palmer. Wounding the leader of the terrorists, Bauer interrogates him, warning the bleeding man he will die unless Bauer helps him get to a hospital. The terrorist talks.
After he spills all his information, Bauer starts to walk away. The terrorist demands to be taken to the hospital.
Were you the one who shot President Palmer? Bauer asks. Yes, replies the wounded terrorist, in agony on the floor. Bauer stares at him for two seconds -- then shoots him.
It is a Jack Bauer moment, and all addicted to "24" knew what would happen to that assassin. For Bauer is a take-no-prisoners patriot who puts love of country and loyalty to friends first, and fights by his own rules. To Jack Bauer, the only good terrorist is a dead terrorist.
What is the appeal of "24"?
It is the fastest-paced, most exciting TV out there. But at bottom, the appeal is that, as in the Westerns of old and "Dirty Harry" movies of the 1970s, Jack Bauer is a flawed but good man in a struggle against evil, who is there to see that his loved ones are secure and justice is done. To Jack Bauer, as to Clint Eastwood's Detective "Dirty Harry" Callahan, vigilante justice is not only preferable to no justice at all, it is the best kind. Evil men should get what they deserve, without legal complications.
"24" satisfies the innate demand in all of us that, the law aside, evil should be punished and justice done.
That the audience for "24" is so loyal and large should tell us something about America and our divisions over the war we are in.
For weeks, Democrats and their media allies have been on Bush's case for using the National Security Agency to intercept, without warrant, phone calls and e-mails to terror suspects abroad. Before that, Bush was charged with using secret detention centers in Eastern Europe to interrogate suspects. Before that, the military was accused of abusing prisoners at Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo and Afghanistan. Before that, the Justice Department was charged with violating the civil rights of Jose Padilla and the Shoe-bomber.
Bush thus stands accused of violating the Geneva Convention on treatment of prisoners of war, ignoring constitutional protections of U.S. citizens, and violating international agreements prohibiting torture and the "rendition" of prisoners to countries where torture is practiced.
Where do the American people stand?
The left may be right on the law, but the people seem to be standing by Bush. Believing the character of this war, where the enemy's preferred tactic is to slaughter civilians with terror bombings, people seem to agree that we have to follow Jack Bauer's rules, not ACLU rules.
Yet one senses that Americans are conflicted. We want to think of ourselves as decent people who fight wars honorably. But we believe the enemies of 9-11 are so evil, so depraved, they forfeit the right to be treated honorably. And while we believe in constitutional rights, human rights, civil rights, Miranda warnings and all that, we also believe in winning our wars. For without victory in the war on terror, freedom may not survive.
"Success alone justifies war," said Von Moltke, as Germany prepared to violate Belgium's neutrality to outflank France in 1914. Americans appear to believe that, too.
President Lincoln suspended habeas corpus and blockaded Southern ports, without congressional authorization. President Wilson locked up Eugene V. Debs in World War I and never let him out. FDR interned 110,000 Japanese and Japanese-Americans in relocation camps, in a wartime act of racial profiling approved by the Supreme Court. Truman dropped atom bombs on defenseless cities, killing 100,000 women and children. Yet all are judged by liberal historians to be great or near-great presidents.
Now, Jack Bauer does not exist, and "24" is made-for-TV escapist entertainment. As we cheer or laugh out loud at his daring exploits, however, one wonders what liberal Democrats of the ACLU variety would do to a real-life Jack Bauer?
My guess: Put him in Leavenworth for life. But President Palmer knew his value, because President Palmer knew the real world.
I'm not a fan of either show but have heard good things about 24 and Lost.
So are they still thinking of extraditing Jack to China.
I agree with the article almost completely. All except the part where he says the left may be right on the law. Te left is never right, they are always on the wrong side of every issue and history.
Good piece.
Top thirty facts about Jack Bauer:
my favorite...Jack Bauer once forgot where he put his keys. He then spent the next half-hour torturing himself until he gave up the location of the keys.
http://www.notrly.com/jackbauer/index.php?topthirty
The Chinese have been awfully quiet for the last few episodes.
"Even a broken clock is right twice a day". However, I do not believe the aformentioned wiretaps are illegal under the circumstances.
Pat's right on this one...
Chloe surprised me with her little co-worker tryst.
I wouldn't vote for him, but this is a very good column. To answer his question, though, I'd venture a guess that there aren't many 'Rats in the audience. Probably they're saving their tv time for pap like "The Book of Daniel."
On the plus side, I hear "Commander in Chief" is faltering in the ratings...
Guess she didn't want to die a virgin.
I never watched it until this season, when I heard the main writer on Medved and Ingraham and found out he was a Conservative. Now I've ordered the last 4 seasons on DVD.
Some seasons are better than others, but this season seems to be the best one of them all, so far.
I think Pat is right on alot of things (not all), and in some cases people are to quick to attack the messenger, rather than listen to his message.
Pat is a person that earns his living by writing and saying things which are provocative and/or interesting. That is his "hook."
His political career followed the Peter Principle. Good enough to keep his job as a speechwriter under multiple Republican Presidents.
But not good enough at policy, to earn promotion upward to policy making roles.
And finally on politics, able to garner just zero point five percent as a candidate, with a wierd vp candidate, a wierd runup, a wierd 3rd party scenario.
Now falling back to his old tried and true breadwinner routine, he writes.
A nice change from Pat's usual question: What would the Fuhrer do?
We should start a pool, too: When do this A&&HOLE president and his traitorous press flack get each one in the neck? Episode # ???
Absolutely.
Until 3 weeks ago, I had never seen 24 (because it's on network). I happened to watch an episode at my daughter's home on her Tivo and got absolutely hooked.
When I got home I rented all of Episode 4 and spent nights just as you said, up until 2 and 3 am. Couldn't let it go.
Now I've completed 4, 1and 2 and am working on 3. Needless to say I now am a 24 junkie and hooked on Day 5.
It helps to have Tivo (I actually have Comcast DVR). Absolutely addictive!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.