Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ClaireSolt

>In the last two elections 2% wouold have swung the tide.

True, but you can't get 100% of a group to vote for you. You can, however, get an additional 2% of Christian votes for example, which in essence amounts to more than 100% of the jewish vote. You gotta go and pander for the larger base and disregard the numerically irrelevant ones.


58 posted on 01/21/2006 7:19:02 PM PST by TheBrotherhood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: TheBrotherhood

A woman of my acquaintance who works for a marketing research firm that does some political demographics makes your points in great detail.

Unfortunately, she considers the President too liberal and so was banned by the Bushbots here at FR.


60 posted on 01/21/2006 7:25:15 PM PST by hlmencken3 (Originalist on the the 'general welfare' clause? No? NOT an originalist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: TheBrotherhood
We shouldn't pander. However, I would note that Jews vote at a very high rate. In New York about 80% of eligable Jews come out for many elections. No one else comes close.
Jews may be 2% of the population, but we are closer to 4% of the electorate.
Jews tend to be better educated, wealthier, and more politically active than others in America. Our influence is certainly not commensorate with population.
74 posted on 01/22/2006 4:56:01 PM PST by rmlew (Sedition and Treason are both crimes, not free speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson