Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

American Jews: Why Are You Still Liberal?
CommonConservative ^ | anuary 16, 2006 | Tom Adkins

Posted on 01/21/2006 4:33:39 PM PST by Nasty McPhilthy

Palestinians are embracing a government of armed thugs. Syria engineered a political assassination in Lebanon, and are sending terrorists all over the world. Saudi Arabia is seriously torn between the modern world and 14th Century Islamofascism. Ariel Sharon is recovering from a coma. And Iran’s leader, after openly coveting the destruction of Israel, began processing uranium for atomic bombs.

American Jews: Why are you still liberal?

From various wars to the Intifadah, American liberal Democrat policy has placated and encouraged Israel’s enemies for over 50 years. Once, the resulting mayhem could be managed by a bit of diplomacy coupled with a few well-placed missiles or a proper tank shot. But now, for the first time in its history, Israel is vulnerable to one single atomic event that could bring about instant, irrevocable elimination of their homeland. And it’s right on the doorstep.

Tell me, please, American Jews: do you think it’s time you took the enemies of Israel seriously?

Allow me to take a time-out here. This is not one of those “damned Jews” rants from an Idaho white separatist group. Jews, like any other nationality, race or religion are welcome to join America’s wonderful national experiment. Yet for some disturbing reason, the American Jew has been the second-most reliable Democrat voting block (behind blacks). Enamored with socialist liberalism, which over the last century caused over 150 million deaths worldwide, including at least 6 million Jews (Nazi stood for “National Socialist”), American Jews helped seek the destruction of the constitutional value pillars rooted in individualism that granted American freedom and power.

But unwilling to admit failure of their vaunted welfare state, Democrats have evolved into a party so virulently opposed to any opposition, they have become rabid fools and traitors. Of course, Americans are free to be fools. We even tolerate traitors to an astounding degree. But for any Jew, this is no longer a squabble for America’s political turf. We are facing nuclear annihilation of the Jewish homeland. So if you have a stake in the situation, and certainly any Jew should, consider recent history. George Bush’s successful overthrow of the Taliban and Saddam Hussein marked the first time in centuries that anyone seriously tried to shred the dangerous unholy alliances, that held the ugly Middle East status quo. Now, 58 million neighboring Arabs weren’t merely freed, but two armies also disappeared. Libya surrendering a surprisingly vast nuclear and biological weapons program. Egypt grudgingly allowed real elections with real opposition parties. Syria withdrew its military from Lebanon. And Bush exposed the corrupt, anti-Semitic vermin running rampant through the hallowed halls of the United Nations. And for that matter, Paris, Berlin, Brussels and Moscow. There is no legitimate comparison between what George Bush has accomplished in the Middle East and any previous American President.

It’s obvious George Bush’s strategy clearly favors Israel’s survival. And it is equally obvious that the Democrat effort to prevent Bush’s success presents a direct threat to Israel. Yet the pedestrian American Jew is still liplocked with liberals, attacking Bush for his boldness and standing in the way of success. Could there be a greater assist to the enemies of Israel?

This presents American Jews with quite a paradox. After successfully helping Democrats turn national and world opinion against Bush, who will muzzle a nuclear armed Iran? You can bet the French and Germans won’t be marching into Tehran soon. Russia? They are supplying Iranians with uranium. So who’s left? If Tel Aviv disappears in a mushroom cloud, will liberal Jews blame George Bush for not sending Big Red One? Probably. But at that point, such hypocritical bleatings may be a bit late.

So what does the American Jew need? A stern warning? A hard slap? A nuclear detonation? Whether by rote habit, sheer stupidity or unthinking arrogance, American Jews are so blindly liberal, they openly put Israel at risk of total annihilation. What Adolph Hitler could not achieve, American Jews may ironically wreak upon their own homeland.

In this war for Middle East, freedom, Americans may accuse American Democrats of being dopes, dupes and traitors. But what adjective accurately describes the American liberal Jew, who would allow his homeland to be destroyed out of blind political folly? No further debate remains. Israel is in atomic peril. American liberal Democrats want to keep it that way. Republicans want to save Israel. The American Jew has run out of excuses. So please, for the sake of your very homeland, answer the question. American Jews: Why are you still liberal?


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Israel; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: americanjews; cryptnazis; generalizations; herecomesthehorde; iran; irannukes; neonazipost; propaganda; unholyalliance
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: Nasty McPhilthy

The jews are more worried about abortion and homosexual "rights" than in Israel's survival.


41 posted on 01/21/2006 5:58:02 PM PST by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nasty McPhilthy
There is no legitimate comparison between what George Bush has accomplished in the Middle East and any previous American President.

Bears repeating.

42 posted on 01/21/2006 6:03:02 PM PST by Wolfstar ("We must...all hang together or...we shall all hang separately." Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nasty McPhilthy
The answer is simple...

All Jews that are STILL Democrats/Progressives/Marxists/Communists/Socialists/Leftists or run of the mill a$$holes --- are obviously members of the lost tribe of Israel....
The STUPID Tribe....that's how they got lost..

I've been negotiating with Israel, to repatriate some of these Stupid Jews - and in exchange allow us to have some of their REAL Jews..

Israel has shown no interest...

Semper Fi
43 posted on 01/21/2006 6:15:11 PM PST by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ Taylor; ml/nj
Here's a tiny bit of the history of early Christianity. Such hatred was more recently (17th-20th centuries) addressed and remedied by some Christian leaders. Now some of the big churches side with the terrorists and call for their corporate members to pull all investments out of businesses in Israel.

Disciples of Chr-st to Israel: Drop dead
http://209.157.64.201/focus/f-religion/1458942/posts

U.S. Presbyterians target five firms with Israel links
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1458765/posts

The Church Stares Into the Abyss (The dhimmitude of the Church of England)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1435084/posts

(Anti-Semitic) Anglican group urges Israel sanctions
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1430566/posts

Anglicans Call for Sanction on Investment in Israel to Uphold Justice
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1430772/posts

THE VATICAN AND THE STANDOFF AT THE CHURCH OF THE NATIVITY
http://www.jcpa.org/jl/vp515.htm

Two United Methodist gatherings urge selective divestment from Israel (official anti-Israel United Methodist Website)
http://www.umc.org/site/c.gjJTJbMUIuE/b.886089/k.A105/Two_United_Methodist_gatherings_urge_selective_divestment_from_Israel.htm

world council of churches (WCC)
church & ecumenical relations
http://www.wcc-coe.org/wcc/what/ecumenical/index-e.html
"Among those churches which are not members of the WCC, the most notable is the Roman Catholic Church (RCC). Since 1965 a Joint Working Group (JWG), co-sponsored by the WCC and the RCC, has met regularly to discuss issues of common interest and promote cooperation. The group meets annually. One of the church and ecumenical relations staff members serves as co-secretary for the JWG and helps to coordinate contact between the Council and the dicasteries of the Vatican through the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity. [And] . . . Though the Roman Catholic Church is not a member of the WCC, it is a full member of the Faith & Order Commission. The RCC also serves the team on Mission & Evangelism in a consultative capacity."
44 posted on 01/21/2006 6:18:46 PM PST by familyop ("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." --President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Polybius

I'm an Ashkenazi Jew and I can still remember my grandparents telling me, point blank, that the Christians are the ones who wanted to kill us and that I should never, ever trust them. (This probably explains my statement to my son that the reason I have guns is that when they kick in the door to take me away, I'll at least have the satisfaction of taking out three or four of the bastards myself.) However, your remarks about the older generation's feelings from Mother Russia really hit home with me - as well as my own observation that living next door to the Baptists, Catholics, and other Christians here in my own town has been overwhelmingly positive. (My grandparents have had to have the gut-wrenching experience watching two of their family marry Catholics, too - including me.)

I liked your presentation a lot. It sure explains things well.


45 posted on 01/21/2006 6:18:54 PM PST by redpoll (redpoll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Polybius

Thank you. Great post. Very illuminating. I think it's easy to forget how far back the roots of some phenomena go, and just look at the seemingly irrational gap between present realities and people's behavior. You give reason for hope for the future.


46 posted on 01/21/2006 6:21:31 PM PST by Athwart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
You won't find the same infatuation with Communism among Sephardic Jews.

Ironically, Orthodox 'Ashkenazim are more similar to American Fundamentalist Protestants than are Sefaradim. The former are more puritanical in religious outlook while the latter have the laid-back attitude of Louisiana Cajuns and some even are open to higher criticism.

47 posted on 01/21/2006 6:22:29 PM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Shallach 'et `ammi veya`avduni!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: redpoll
Thank you. That explanation makes sense. Still, I wish they would get past that and come to their senses.
48 posted on 01/21/2006 6:26:43 PM PST by Colorado Doug (Diversity is divisive. E. Pluribus Unum (Out of many, one))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Nasty McPhilthy

Actually, George W. Bush made some inroads among Jewish voters in 2004.


49 posted on 01/21/2006 6:26:59 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (Sam Alito Deserves To Be Confirmed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

>Why are so many supposedly "conservative" columnists harping so much about less than 2% of our population?

I wonder myself why too. I mean, they're numerically irrelevant leftists. Were I in charge of RNC, I'd go after bigger ethnic groups to expand our tend.


50 posted on 01/21/2006 6:32:55 PM PST by TheBrotherhood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: All
I find this article interesting in that my father and I were talking about this very thing today. He made the point that the Catholic Church in America is under attack and that there are those who want to see its destruction. I made the point that every other religion is standing by and letting it happen, including the Jews.

I then said, "I just don't understand it! If the Catholic Chruch in America falls, who is NEXT?! One would think that the Jews would have learned after 2000 years of persecution."

51 posted on 01/21/2006 6:38:51 PM PST by misharu (US Congress = children without adult supervision)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Celtjew Libertarian
Jews generally had it better under Muslim rulers than under Christian rulers.

Of course, I wasn't around then so I can only judge by those Jews whom I know something about. The two most renowned Torah scholars of the Middle Ages were Maimonides (RAMBAM) and RASHI. Maimonides lived in Golden Age Spain where his family led a secret Jewish existence. When Maimonides was a young adult, his family fled first to Morocco, and not finding peace there the fled to Egypt, Palestine, and back to Egypt. In Egypt Maimonides was put on trial for his life having been accused of converting to Islam and then returning to Judaism. We are supposed to be grateful that the nice Muslims acquitted him. RASHI lived in France and made wine.

ML/NJ

52 posted on 01/21/2006 6:44:31 PM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: rmlew; Yehuda
Ping



53 posted on 01/21/2006 6:46:59 PM PST by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Godebert

Yup, abortion of "non humans" is the trump card. I have always been bothered by this. I thought Jews, of all people, would be the most sensitive people on earth to the slaughter of innocents, but no. I don't think I've ever met a Jewish person who wasn't pro abortion.


54 posted on 01/21/2006 6:47:35 PM PST by boop (The Gimp's asleep!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TheBrotherhood

In the last two elections 2% wouold have swung the tide. My ex complains about the Jews who put such emphasis on Israel in his Democratic club work in Boca Raton.


55 posted on 01/21/2006 6:52:34 PM PST by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru; Polybius
"IMHO, it is simply something absorbed while growing up. Oops - make that getting older but no wiser."

I've given a lot of thought to the general question of Jewish leftism over past years, since it's an area of personal concern. There are some pertinent comments on the thread, especially #35 IMO.

A large percentage of American Jews came here as leftists and have handed down the traditions of leftism from generation to generation, just as other Americans *used* to hand down our traditions of individual freedom and personal liberty. My opinion is that one of the reasons that American Jews have clung to leftist traditions so doggedly for several generations is simply because they were excluded so long from so much of American society. But now that society is open to Jews, I have hopes that the traditions of the left will be abandoned and those of freedom embraced. I tentatively believe that is now happening.

56 posted on 01/21/2006 6:56:44 PM PST by Sam Cree (absolute reality) - ("Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one." Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: boop

Jewish tradition records a prohibition of abortions for non-Jews that is more absolute than the prohibition of abortion for Jews.


57 posted on 01/21/2006 7:00:03 PM PST by hlmencken3 (Originalist on the the 'general welfare' clause? No? NOT an originalist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt

>In the last two elections 2% wouold have swung the tide.

True, but you can't get 100% of a group to vote for you. You can, however, get an additional 2% of Christian votes for example, which in essence amounts to more than 100% of the jewish vote. You gotta go and pander for the larger base and disregard the numerically irrelevant ones.


58 posted on 01/21/2006 7:19:02 PM PST by TheBrotherhood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: hlmencken3; boop
"Jewish tradition records a prohibition of abortions for non-Jews that is more absolute than the prohibition of abortion for Jews."

That is true. Just today, I received an e-mail from an Orthodox Rabbi on that. He wrote, "Abortion is considered MURDER under Noachide Law." "Noachides," for any readers here who don't know, are all people who are not Jewish.
59 posted on 01/21/2006 7:19:02 PM PST by familyop ("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." --President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: TheBrotherhood

A woman of my acquaintance who works for a marketing research firm that does some political demographics makes your points in great detail.

Unfortunately, she considers the President too liberal and so was banned by the Bushbots here at FR.


60 posted on 01/21/2006 7:25:15 PM PST by hlmencken3 (Originalist on the the 'general welfare' clause? No? NOT an originalist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson