Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Closer to man than ape
The Guardian ^ | Tuesday January 24, 2006 | Ian Sample

Posted on 01/23/2006 9:02:50 PM PST by Ma3lst0rm

They already use basic tools, have rudimentary language and star in TV commercials, but now scientists have proof that chimpanzees are more closely related to humans than other great apes.

Genetic tests comparing DNA from humans, chimps, gorillas and orang-utans reveal striking similarities in the way chimps and humans evolve that set them apart from the others.

The finding adds weight to a controversial proposal to scrap the long-used chimp genus "Pan" and reclassify the animals as members of the human family. The move would give chimps a new place in creation's pecking order alongside humans, the only survivor of the genus Homo.

The biologist Soojin Yi's team at Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta compared 63m base pairs of DNA from different species, where each base is a letter in the animal's genetic code. They then analysed the DNA to look at what evolutionary biologists call the molecular clock, the rate at which an animal's genetic code evolves. The speed of the clock shows how the span of a generation has changed over the millennia.

The tests showed that even though humans and chimps split from a common ancestor between 5m and 7m years ago, the rate at which their genetic codes were evolving was extremely similar, differing by only 3%, and much slower than gorillas and orang-utans.

(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: apes; godsgravesglyphs; man
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
This is funny. Molecular clocks are still far from reliable science and are based upon much conjecture. Even if the idea of molecular clocks were proven beyond a doubt the "rate of evolution" certainly would not be a good indicator for reclassification. Also the gene expression in humans is very different from that of apes and chimpanzees with as much as 80% of resultant proteins being different. Also we have nearly as much similarity with mice and as much as 75% similarity with some worms. This would be laughable if it were not for "highly educated" scientists proposing such a stupid thing as the including of chimps in the human family. It is clearly an ideological goal not a scientific one.

(reference: Galina Glazko, Vamsi Veeramachaneni, Masatoshi Nei and Wojciech Makalowski, "Eighty Percent of Proteins are Different between Humans and Chimpanzees," Gene volume 346 14 February 2005, Pages 215-219 )

1 posted on 01/23/2006 9:02:52 PM PST by Ma3lst0rm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ma3lst0rm

I report, you decide.

2 posted on 01/23/2006 9:07:43 PM PST by martin_fierro (GO STILLERS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ma3lst0rm

In the case of The Guardian, I can well believe it!


3 posted on 01/23/2006 9:11:20 PM PST by Aussie Dasher (The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

I was wondering about what zoo that guy escaped from.


4 posted on 01/23/2006 9:12:32 PM PST by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ma3lst0rm

"They" also say that we, as mammals, originally evolved from a prehistoric salamander.

Therefore, I am your overlord.

Kneel before Newt.


5 posted on 01/23/2006 9:13:33 PM PST by Salamander (Cursed With Second Sight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Hahahahahahaha Love it!


6 posted on 01/23/2006 9:13:48 PM PST by Ma3lst0rm (Some wish to spread joy and hope and others wish to make sure no one has a greater portion of either)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam; PatrickHenry; SunkenCiv
I have an idea that ID'ers and Creationists are not going to like this article...

Just a guess...

7 posted on 01/23/2006 9:14:54 PM PST by Drammach (In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

Yes they say many things that are not in any possible way proven or falsifiable.


8 posted on 01/23/2006 9:17:11 PM PST by Ma3lst0rm (Some wish to spread joy and hope and others wish to make sure no one has a greater portion of either)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ma3lst0rm
This would be laughable if it were not for "highly educated" scientists proposing such a stupid thing as the including of chimps in the human family. It is clearly an ideological goal not a scientific one.

Saving this as one of the 29 evidences that evolution is a religion.
9 posted on 01/23/2006 9:18:01 PM PST by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ma3lst0rm
"Molecular clocks are still far from reliable science and are based upon much conjecture."
That's why they gave themselves a rather generous time bracket - 5 to 7 million years. If it turns out that it was 4.8 to 7.5, it'd also OK within the framework. So what would be a new name? Homo satyrus?
10 posted on 01/23/2006 9:18:35 PM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ma3lst0rm

No.
This is completely true.
It is your duty to worship me as your evolutionary Queen.



;D


11 posted on 01/23/2006 9:20:27 PM PST by Salamander (Cursed With Second Sight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

"Homo satyrus"

Only in San Francisco.


12 posted on 01/23/2006 9:21:39 PM PST by Salamander (Cursed With Second Sight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ma3lst0rm

I thought we already knew this? Bonobo's specifically.


13 posted on 01/23/2006 9:26:31 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ma3lst0rm

Course if it turns out the chimps vote overwhelmingly for the GOP, why just forget the whole damn thing and moveon, fergit it. Stifle thyself! Now!!!


14 posted on 01/23/2006 9:29:16 PM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

Turned into a newt?


15 posted on 01/23/2006 9:30:58 PM PST by null and void ("Never place a period where God has placed a coma" --Gracie Allen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

Homo troglodities, I'd guess.


16 posted on 01/23/2006 9:32:41 PM PST by null and void ("Never place a period where God has placed a coma" --Gracie Allen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Yes.
But I got better.....:)


17 posted on 01/23/2006 9:35:31 PM PST by Salamander (Cursed With Second Sight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Salamander
Yes. But I got better...

Barney Miller... " But I'm feeling much better, now.."..

18 posted on 01/23/2006 9:38:06 PM PST by Drammach (In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

I thought the kitties were our overlords.


19 posted on 01/23/2006 9:38:07 PM PST by RichInOC (Valhalla, I am coming....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Drammach

Monty Python.

[the nose was a carrot]...;]


20 posted on 01/23/2006 9:43:04 PM PST by Salamander (Cursed With Second Sight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson