Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Doctor admits Lancet study is fiction
Nature ^ | 1-19-06 | Emma Marris

Posted on 01/24/2006 6:05:17 PM PST by tallhappy

A Norwegian researcher dreamed up the lives and lifestyles of some 900 people — and used them in a study on cancer. Then, last October, Jon Sudbø had his results published in The Lancet.

___

Last week, Sudbø, who is based at the Norwegian Radium Hospital in Oslo, admitted that the data had not come from that database or any other, but from thin air. Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com

Many details of this case still need to be worked out. There is some indication that Sudbø may have mental health problems. It is also not clear what his 13 co-authors knew about the fraud — the paper identifies three others as contributing equally to the research, and among the other co-authors are Sudbø's wife and his identical twin. None of the authors could be reached for comment.

(Excerpt) Read more at nature.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: data; fake; fraud; pufflist; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
More fake science. The Lancet is the major medical journal in Britain -- not small potatoes.

And this is about oral cancer, a quite serious issue.

1 posted on 01/24/2006 6:05:17 PM PST by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gabz; SheLion

Maybe this will lead to more admissions.


2 posted on 01/24/2006 6:07:59 PM PST by Just A Nobody (I - LOVE - my attitude problem! WBB lives on. Beware the Enemedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justanobody

Like the alleged 100,000 Iraqis killed since the US toppled Saddam.....


3 posted on 01/24/2006 6:15:09 PM PST by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Frank_2001
Yes, for starters!

Have you seen this thread?

"Poll: Afghans, Iraqis most optimistic"

4 posted on 01/24/2006 6:18:25 PM PST by Just A Nobody (I - LOVE - my attitude problem! WBB lives on. Beware the Enemedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Justanobody; Just another Joe; CSM; lockjaw02; Publius6961; elkfersupper; nopardons; metesky; ...
Maybe this will lead to more admissions.

We can only wish.............

Thanks Justanobody for the alert!!!!!!

5 posted on 01/24/2006 6:18:34 PM PST by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Justanobody

There is a guy at work that rants about the Bush administration ignoring scientific research. I love sending him articles like this. Even though this isn't proof that even a smidgen of scientific research is bad; I just love to see the guy's reaction. I'm bad that way... BTW - The South Korean guy was the gift that kept giving.


6 posted on 01/24/2006 6:18:52 PM PST by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

Glad you liked it!! ;*)


7 posted on 01/24/2006 6:20:46 PM PST by Just A Nobody (I - LOVE - my attitude problem! WBB lives on. Beware the Enemedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
It is also not clear what his 13 co-authors knew about the fraud — the paper identifies three others as contributing equally to the research, and among the other co-authors are Sudbø's wife and his identical twin. None of the authors could be reached for comment.

Maybe they don't exist either.

The real story here is the astounding degree to which some of the major medical journals have abandoned any pretense of service to science, in favor of advocacy journalism parroting the left-wing political meme of the week.

-ccm

8 posted on 01/24/2006 6:21:18 PM PST by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
More fake science. The Lancet is the major medical journal in Britain -- not small potatoes.

The Lancet,along with the New England Journal of Medicine and the Journal Of The American Medical Association are the three most widely read and highly respected medical periodicals in the world.

Given this,the physician involved could have seriously harmed many by means of his deception.

9 posted on 01/24/2006 6:21:22 PM PST by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dutch Boy

LOL! I will keep my eyes open for you. Nothing better than keeping them hopping! ;*)


10 posted on 01/24/2006 6:23:22 PM PST by Just A Nobody (I - LOVE - my attitude problem! WBB lives on. Beware the Enemedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
A Norwegian researcher dreamed up the lives and lifestyles of some 900 people — and used them in a study on cancer. Then, last October, Jon Sudbø had his results published in The Lancet.

Now he can move on to environmental science and global warming.

11 posted on 01/24/2006 6:26:10 PM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
There is some indication that Sudbø may have mental health problems.

But he's sane enough to know he can hide out and draw a salary in academia.
12 posted on 01/24/2006 6:27:05 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy

when is the world going to wake up to the fact that liberal scientists have been making up data for 50 years, to forward their agendas.

am I the only one not surprised by this? my whole life it's been something is good for you... followed by no.. it's gonna kill you! one fake study after another promising the moon. Meanwhile I just live my life the way I wish, eat what I want in moderation, do what I want, and never get sick, and stay happy and healthy all the time, while shaking my head at all the idiots that run from one fad to another or spend their entire lives eating rice cakes or on a machine in the gym.


13 posted on 01/24/2006 6:31:53 PM PST by conservative physics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy

Dan rather insists that results are still accurate!


14 posted on 01/24/2006 6:33:03 PM PST by flashbunny (Are you annoying ME? Are you annoying ME? You must be annoying me, since there's no one else here!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frank_2001
100000 Civilian Deaths Estimated in Iraq (washingtonpost.com)

Lancet was bogus as hell on that one. It looks like they were fooled on this one.

15 posted on 01/24/2006 6:37:01 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Thought this might be interesting.


16 posted on 01/24/2006 6:38:00 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Justanobody

I sent him the "Save the Pacific Northwest Octopus" link the other day. for a few minutes he thought I jumped the fence to his side. Then he caught on. He wasn't too happy. A few hours later I got an email about how dumb Bush was. Nice retort. LOL.


17 posted on 01/24/2006 6:38:05 PM PST by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
The real story here is the astounding degree to which some of the major medical journals have abandoned any pretense of service to science, in favor of advocacy journalism parroting the left-wing political meme of the week.

Actually the story here is that this fact is finally coming out at all..............it has been being said for a long time, most often about the Lancet, but never gets reported.

18 posted on 01/24/2006 6:39:22 PM PST by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy

Yep. Thing is, peer review for publication is not really set up to detect when the entire body of data is falsified. It does detect flaws in theory, terminology, and overall grasp of the subject matter, but without recreating the entire procedure for gathering the raw data one is left with spot-checks and trust. This isn't the first time and won't be the last.


19 posted on 01/24/2006 6:39:32 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative physics

What you said.......


20 posted on 01/24/2006 6:41:09 PM PST by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson