Don't Dem fools have any sense of irony whatsoever? Between her and the senior blob from Massive2sh!tts.....
BUMP!
She wants to return to the White House, and will do so in any way she can, aided and abetted by the media types who adore her.
Looks like this is one for you
the next thing is going to be that the bush family killed vince foster.
This is "breaking" "news"?
:-)
51%, Honey. 51% of Americans wouldn't vote for you if you were running against Simon Cowell. What you do or say JUST DOESN'T MATTER. Get it? Now go look for a real job.
| get some popcorn, sit back, and make sure the tin foil is snug... I'm gonna spin a tale...(try to not skip ahead) The date, sometime before summer 1998. Imagine you are politically hyper-active, power hungry, and love the life style afforded the highest office in the land. You realize it will all end in 2.5 years, at which point you will be pushed to the side. This just won't do. You are HRClinton, what's your next step? You have all your friends in the media begging you to run, but you have never held office, any office, at any level. You aren't stupid and know you'd never make it. Therefore, you will have to hold some high level office in 2000. So that rules out running for POTUS in 2000. 2004 would also be out since you'd only be a freshman. You know you'll have to serve one successful term without controversy and without pissing off too many people. This leaves you with 2008 and 2012. 2012 would be out since you'd be getting even longer in the tooth and the shine would be too far off the apple (being as nice as possible here) to sell. Therefore, 2008 it is. No problem. If a democrat wins in 2000, he'd run again in 2004. If he wins in 2004, his running mate would be tossed to the 2nd seat again in 2008, if you put your hat in the ring. If he loses in 2004, you're set for an uncontested shot at 2008 top slot. Only a democrat loss in 2000 causes problems, because you'd have to insure a democrat loss in 2004. This could be accomplished after the DNC in July 2004 by reduced or unflattering news coverage. Potentially leaking of damaging information (which you have, of course) would also insure a democrat loss in 2004. So... you have it all set. You figure it's a no brainer. You only have to pick the type of high level office you want. This leaves governor, senate, or congress. Congress doesn't yield enough power. Governor's do a lot of work, and run the higher risk of pissing people off. That leaves the Senate. Powerful, low risk, most people don't even know their senators. Therefore, senator clinton it is. Next question, which state? Has to be a big, powerful state with the possibility of getting in. The 4 most powerful states would be (in no particular order): Texas, California, New York, and Florida. Texas and Florida are off the ticket right away. California is unlikely, and that leaves New York. No problem. So the only thing you need to do is buy a house in New York. Then the unthinkable. Someone has the gaul to actually suggest they want to run for the same seat! YOUR seat! This person can't just be dismissed, unlike the others. This one is a democrat! And he's well respected by democrats AND republicans! Whoa! This isn't good. He's well liked by all demographics. He has actually had a successful business in New York and the people genuinely like him. Worse still, the media loves him... they swoon all over him! This cannot be allowed to stop *US*, the co-presidents! How dare he?! The question: You're HRClinton, what do you do? Yes, we have all heard the term 'arkan-cide'.. and you've deflected all the stories in the passed, what's one more? This guy even flies a personal airplane (what was he thinking?!). No problem. Question: Who do you think that 'pretender' was?
JFK Jr.
Remember, they were found, all three of them, still in the plane. None of them even tried to unbuckle their belts. My guess, something in their drinks to help them sleep.
|
I would go for sainthood for Hillary. It is my understanding that, in the Catholic Church, sainthood can only be granted posthumously.
|
Allow us to refresh the scandalous record, starting with her central role in Travelgate. This, you'll recall, was one of the first in the parade of scandals we know as the Clinton administration. There is fresh evidence that Hillary ordered the purge of career White House Travel Office officials to make room for the Clintons' cronies from Arkansas -- and used the FBI and IRS to persecute those innocent workers. New details of her involvement come from the FBI official who wrote the Travelgate report to Congress. I.C. Smith, head of the bureau's Arkansas field office at the time, calls "absurd" Hillary's claims that she had only a limited role in the affair. "It was Hillary Clinton's former Rose Law Firm partners, Vince Foster and Bill Kennedy, who were obviously feeling the pressure" to frame Travel Office chief Billy Dale and others who got in the way. "Combine that with the appearance of longtime Hillary confidantes Bernard Nussbaum and Patsy Thomasson on the scene, and it was clear to me that Hillary was the one applying the pressure." In the end, "the allegations of misconduct by loyal, longtime employees was of the White House's making and was ultimately unsubstantiated," Smith says in his memoir, "Inside: A Top G-Man Exposes Spies, Lies, and Bureaucratic Bungling Inside the FBI." It took a pro-Clinton D.C. jury only a short while to find Dale innocent of all the charges the White House had trumped up against him.But the damage was done -- Hillary had ruined his career and his life, and still has offered no apologies to him or his family. And yet she now proclaims to be the avenger of victims of cronyism.
Oh yes, she also says she's fighting against cover-ups. Hmm. Maybe she can finally explain one of her own -- namely, how her billing records went missing while under subpoena in the Whitewater probe.
|
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006
