Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senator Mark Pryor(D) Will Not Support a Filibuster on Alito
The AP via WREG-TV Memphis ^ | January 27, 2006

Posted on 01/27/2006 3:33:23 PM PST by new yorker 77

Pryor says he will vote against Samuel Alito's confirmation

LITTLE ROCK Senator Mark Pryor said today he will not support Samuel Alito's confirmation to the U-S Supreme Court. But Pryor also says he will not support a filibuster to block a Senate vote.

A final vote to make Alito a Supreme Court justice is scheduled for Tuesday, just before President Bush will give his State of the Union address to Congress and the nation.

Pryor's decision is unlikely to affect the outcome of a vote on Alito.

Pryor said that after studying Alito's cases, he concluded that Alito would not be impartial.

Copyright 2006 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas
KEYWORDS: 109th; alito; alitovote; filibuster; markpryor; scotus

1 posted on 01/27/2006 3:33:24 PM PST by new yorker 77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Darn right! Straight up or down vote. Senators trying to implement a filibuster will only look like foolish obstructionists.


2 posted on 01/27/2006 3:36:01 PM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
Similar article with a bunch more info.
3 posted on 01/27/2006 3:36:44 PM PST by upchuck (Article posts of just one or two sentences do not preserve the quality of FR. Lazy FReepers be gone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
Pryor said that after studying Alito's cases, he concluded that Alito would not be impartial.

Of course Prior offered examples, right? Come on, Prior, your constituents have a right to know how YOU think. Let's actually see if you read one of Alito's decisions and can make an agrument as to how it demonstrates bias, or literacy, or whatever. If I recall correctly, that question has bit more than one of you Senators on the butt, hasn't it?

4 posted on 01/27/2006 3:40:30 PM PST by NonValueAdded (What ever happened to "Politics stops at the water's edge?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Translation: Senator Pryor realizes that Judge Alito is an excellent choice for the Supreme Court. However, the special interests who finance his campaigns and the party bosses who determine his committee assignments and pork rationing are opposed to Judge Alito. On the other hand, Senator Pryor's constituents overwhelmingly support Judge Alito.

So what is a career politician to do in such a case? He's to (ahem) show the Wisdom of Solomon and split the difference. He'll vote to let Judge Alito be confirmed, and then vote against confirming him. That should please everyone a little bit, right?

I'll take what I can get out of this hack Pryor. All we really need is his cloture vote.


5 posted on 01/27/2006 3:42:30 PM PST by puroresu (Conservatism is an observation; Liberalism is an ideology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: puroresu; Mo1; A Citizen Reporter; Peach

I guess he'll be showing up at the SOTU, huh?


6 posted on 01/27/2006 3:43:45 PM PST by Howlin (Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Democrats squabble over Alito filibuster; approval seems certain

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1566506/posts


7 posted on 01/27/2006 3:44:51 PM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Life is good.


8 posted on 01/27/2006 3:48:22 PM PST by Howlin (Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

So Pryor will vote "Present" on cloture, thus supporting a filibuster? Or will he vote "No?" Cloture takes 60 affirmative votes.


9 posted on 01/27/2006 3:54:49 PM PST by Otho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Otho
Any vote other than a 'Yes' on Cloture would be a vote to filibuster.

Pryor said he will not support this. Therefore, he will vote 'Yes' on Cloture.
10 posted on 01/27/2006 4:04:54 PM PST by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Note to myself: Remember this occasion when a couple of years from now I hear Senator Kerry say "I voted to approve Judge Alito...before I voted to NOT approve him!"

...and again the democrat party faithful will say to each other, "Bush is a dumbass, heavy drinking, frat boy who swaggers when he walks and butcher's the Queens English, but he beat us again!!"

There needs to be lots of bandages and towels in the House Tuesday evening - to hand out to those who slash their wrists when Dubya swaggers down the aisle again, grinning ear to ear - just hours after confirmation of yet another of his Supreme Court nominees.

God, I love it!!!

If only Alito (Alieoto to Ted) could be immediately sworn in and walk in with the other justices. Or better yet, administer the oath in the well of the house!!

I'm getting too excited here. 'Just need to go get a vodka/tonic and sit back and quietly enjoy the moment... :o)


11 posted on 01/27/2006 4:33:13 PM PST by Rhetorical pi2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

12 posted on 01/27/2006 4:33:44 PM PST by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

let's just see if it holds, its not Tuesday yet.


13 posted on 01/27/2006 4:34:38 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
"I don't want to make myself look stupid by supporting a filibuster, but I really want that moveon.org money."

Sure is fun watching the Dems these days, now that the far-Left nutter organizations seem to be the ones with all the cash.

14 posted on 01/27/2006 4:45:20 PM PST by Starve The Beast (I used to be disgusted, but now I try to be amused)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

LOL.

I can see Kerry calling in sick on Tuesday. The rest will show. Can't wait to see which faces Hillary makes THAT day.


15 posted on 01/27/2006 4:47:33 PM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: puroresu

Pryor is an Arkansas backwoods Bolshevik, just like his daddy, who helped defeat Bork.


16 posted on 01/27/2006 4:58:48 PM PST by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rhetorical pi2
If only Alito (Alieoto to Ted) could be immediately sworn in and walk in with the other justices.

The plan that I have seen referred to elsewhere on FR today is to have the vote at 11:00 on Tuesday and to swear him in immediately after.

17 posted on 01/27/2006 5:45:14 PM PST by Bahbah (An admitted Snow Flake and a member of Sam's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Are these jackasses just trying to show some last minute attitude for their supporters? Or do they truly believe they can filibuster? Better yet, do they really plan to boycot the SOTU address? Strange that this came on a Friday afternoon. With the WHOLE weekend to growl and snap and threaten all over the Sunday talk shows.


18 posted on 01/27/2006 5:50:50 PM PST by small voice in the wilderness (The Culture of Corruption hurts. But it's the dems. Corruption of Culture that destroys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Any vote other than a 'Yes' on Cloture would be a vote to filibuster.

Pryor said he will not support this. Therefore, he will vote 'Yes' on Cloture.

----
Lets hope so. Don't put it beyond weasily Dem's to vote "present", and then claim they didn't vote for a fillibuster.


19 posted on 01/27/2006 7:54:57 PM PST by jbarntt (Tagline:optional, printed after your name on post): -30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson