Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Experts Claim Official 9/11 Story is a Hoax (Super-Mega BARF Alert)
PR Web ^ | 1/30/06 | Unknown

Posted on 01/30/2006 12:50:09 PM PST by ChuckShick

Mon Jan 30, 11:37 AM ET

(PRWEB) - Duluth, MN (PRWEB) January 30, 2006 -- A group of distinguished experts and scholars, including Robert M. Bowman, James H. Fetzer, Wayne Madsen, John McMurtry, Morgan Reynolds, and Andreas von Buelow, have concluded that senior government officials have covered up crucial facts about what really happened on 9/11.

They have joined with others in common cause as members of "Scholars for 9/11 Truth" (S9/11T), because they are convinced, based on their own research, that the administration has been deceiving the nation about critical events in New York and Washington, D.C.

These experts suggest these events may have been orchestrated by elements within the administration to manipulate Americans into supporting policies at home and abroad they would never have condoned absent "another Pearl Harbor."

They believe that this White House is incapable of investigating itself and hope the possibility that Congress might hold an unaccountable administration accountable is not merely naive or wishful thinking.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911; 911conspiracy; moonbats; sheehan; tinfoil; whackos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-149 next last
Awww jeez, not this s*** again.
1 posted on 01/30/2006 12:50:13 PM PST by ChuckShick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

I vote that we investigate these idiots.


2 posted on 01/30/2006 12:51:13 PM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

Another version of Holocaust denial.


3 posted on 01/30/2006 12:51:49 PM PST by fizziwig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

Of course this again. After all, these folks did all that nice research for the Al Jazeera television station...


4 posted on 01/30/2006 12:52:25 PM PST by Kidan (Tolerance is the virtue of a man without convictions - G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

5 posted on 01/30/2006 12:52:29 PM PST by maineman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick
These experts suggest these events may have been orchestrated by elements within the administration to manipulate Americans into supporting policies at home and abroad

Experts in bovine scatology maybe.

6 posted on 01/30/2006 12:52:57 PM PST by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

Sounds like these guys should be investigated for ties to terrorists.


7 posted on 01/30/2006 12:53:07 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick
Click here for a who's who at Scholars for 9/11 Truth.
8 posted on 01/30/2006 12:53:09 PM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

If they are so distinguished, how come I've never heard of any of them?


9 posted on 01/30/2006 12:53:12 PM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

10 posted on 01/30/2006 12:53:12 PM PST by Bushbacker1 (Kill 'em til they're dead! Then, kill 'em again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick
A group of distinguished experts and scholars, including Robert M. Bowman, James H. Fetzer, Wayne Madsen, John McMurtry, Morgan Reynolds, and Andreas von Buelow, have concluded that senior government officials have covered up crucial facts about what really happened on 9/11.

And which mental institution these distinguished experts and scholars are locked in?

11 posted on 01/30/2006 12:53:29 PM PST by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

They're so distinguished that I've never heard of them.


12 posted on 01/30/2006 12:53:41 PM PST by dirtboy (My new years resolution is to quit using taglines...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

" A group of distinguished experts and scholars ..."

Because they say so, apparently?


13 posted on 01/30/2006 12:54:23 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

(yawn)


14 posted on 01/30/2006 12:54:27 PM PST by Search4Truth (The spirit of freedom is more powerful than the rule of tyrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick
In the history of structural engineering, steel-frame high-rise buildings have never been brought down due to fires either before or since 9/11, so how can fires have brought down three in one day? How is this possible?

Hmmm. How about massive structural damage with a bunch of really heavy floors above the structural damage???? Twits...

15 posted on 01/30/2006 12:54:45 PM PST by trebb ("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

This is as sick as the story about Israel being behind the 911 events.


16 posted on 01/30/2006 12:54:54 PM PST by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maineman

Here are some of the kinds of considerations that these experts and scholar find profoundly troubling:

* In the history of structural engineering, steel-frame high-rise buildings have never been brought down due to fires either before or since 9/11, so how can fires have brought down three in one day? How is this possible?

* The BBC has reported that at least five of the nineteen alleged "hijackers" have turned up alive and well living in Saudi Arabia, yet according to the FBI, they were among those killed in the attacks. How is this possible?

* Frank DeMartini, a project manager for the WTC, said the buildings were designed with load redistribution capabilities to withstand the impact of airliners, whose effects would be like "puncturing mosquito netting with a pencil." Yet they completely collapsed. How is this possible?

* Since the melting point of steel is about 2,700*F, the temperature of jet fuel fires does not exceed 1,800*F under optimal conditions, and UL certified the steel used to 2,000*F for six hours, the buildings cannot have collapsed due to heat from the fires. How is this possible?

* Flight 77, which allegedly hit the building, left the radar screen in the vicinity of the Ohio/Kentucky border, only to "reappear" in very close proximity to the Pentagon shortly before impact. How is this possible?

* Foreign "terrorists" who were clever enough to coordinate hijacking four commercial airliners seemingly did not know that the least damage to the Pentagon would be done by hitting its west wing. How is this possible?

* Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, in an underground bunker at the White House, watched Vice President Cheney castigate a young officer for asking, as the plane drew closer and closer to the Pentagon, "Do the orders still stand?" The order cannot have been to shoot it down, but must have been the opposite. How is this possible?

* A former Inspector General for the Air Force has observed that Flight 93, which allegedly crashed in Pennsylvania, should have left debris scattered over an area less than the size of a city block; but it is scattered over an area of about eight square miles. How is this possible?

* A tape recording of interviews with air traffic controllers on duty on 9/11 was deliberately crushed, cut into very small pieces, and distributed in assorted places to insure its total destruction. How is this possible?

* The Pentagon conducted a training exercise called "MASCAL" simulating the crash of a Boeing 757 into the building on 24 October 2000, and yet Condoleezza Rice, among others, has repeatedly asserted that "no one ever imagined" a domestic airplane could be used as a weapon. How is this possible?

Their own physics research has established that only controlled demolitions are consistent with the near-gravity speed of fall and virtually symmetrical collapse of all three of the WTC buildings. While turning concrete into very fine dust, they fell straight-down into their own footprints.

These experts and scholars have found themselves obliged to conclude that the 9/11 atrocity represents an instance of the approach--which has been identified by Karl Rove, the President's closest adviser--of "creating our own reality."


17 posted on 01/30/2006 12:55:10 PM PST by maineman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

Statement by Robert M. Bowman
March for Peace
Melbourne, Florida
February 15, 2003

I'm here representing Veterans For Peace, an organization of thousands of combat veterans. All of us have put our lives on the line for this country. And all of us are opposed to a war with Iraq.

http://www.vvaw.org/veteran/article/?id=341


18 posted on 01/30/2006 12:55:11 PM PST by eyespysomething (For you to insult me, I must first value your opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

This is still getting play? Man, I need to get some tin foil stocks.


19 posted on 01/30/2006 12:55:21 PM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maineman

20 posted on 01/30/2006 12:55:46 PM PST by Ouderkirk (Funny how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

I'm sure this band of "distinguished scholars" also believes that Santa Claus is a racist construct and that Western hegemony is repsonsible for the rise of Hamas.


21 posted on 01/30/2006 12:56:24 PM PST by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick
The New York Times, which, in their opinion, has repeatedly failed to exercise the leadership expecedt from our nation's newspaper of record by a series of inexplicable lapses

Gotta give 'em a thumbs ups for that statement, lol.

22 posted on 01/30/2006 12:56:34 PM PST by mtbopfuyn (Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maineman
I guess they never read the Popular Mechanics article that brought together scientists and engineers and disproved every single one of the moonbat's proof that you outlined here.
23 posted on 01/30/2006 12:56:58 PM PST by mnehring (Perry 06- It's better than a hippie in a cowboy hat or a commie with blue hair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

How about some "Truth in Advertising"......

all these left-wing dingbat groups should not be allowed to get away with posturing as "non-partisan and objective".... they are the loony fringe of insanity.

Let them be called "Psychotic Morons for Revisionist History" and then we will know who they are....


24 posted on 01/30/2006 12:57:32 PM PST by Enchante (Democrats: "We are ALL broken and worn out, our party & ideas, what else is new?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

Whack jobs wouldn't know an an attack on this nation is even if the enemy blew up the whack jobs homes.

How is this possible? ( sarcasm based on the moronic writing of this article)

Freaks, stupid freaks.


25 posted on 01/30/2006 12:57:42 PM PST by A message
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick
I actually hope they get lots of air time!

(Chuck - Are you still clerking for Judge Smails?)

26 posted on 01/30/2006 12:57:56 PM PST by Niteranger68 ("Only 4 out of 3 Democrats actually vote.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Thanks for the link. Actually, one of them is a client of ours. LOL!!


27 posted on 01/30/2006 12:58:16 PM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

This guy also believes Bush killed Wellstone. You can safely ignore these guys.


28 posted on 01/30/2006 12:58:42 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twigs
Thanks for the link. Actually, one of them is a client of ours. LOL!!

Are you in psychiatry?

29 posted on 01/30/2006 12:59:15 PM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

Why is "Ground Zero" cordoned off? So people don't bump into the buildings that are now invisible?


30 posted on 01/30/2006 12:59:55 PM PST by N. Theknow (Kennedys - Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat - But they know what's best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Those are some of the least "distinguished" faculty resumes I've seen in a long time...


31 posted on 01/30/2006 1:00:38 PM PST by cammie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick; All
* Since the melting point of steel is about 2,700*F, the temperature of jet fuel fires does not exceed 1,800*F under optimal conditions, and UL certified the steel used to 2,000*F for six hours, the buildings cannot have collapsed due to heat from the fires. How is this possible?


OK, quick metallurgy lesson. The steel didn't melt. When steel gets hot, its properties change. At high heat, steel will start to deform more and begin to loose its structural integrity.

Most of us has seen a car that has been burned. The temps in that car were much less than what the WTC had, but the steel left from the car fire is nowhere near as strong as it was before that fire. Imagine that happening to a building.

The WTC was built using truss (sp) construction. The failure pattern of the WTC is exactly what you would expect from such a failure. In fact, I am very impressed the structures held as long as they did!
32 posted on 01/30/2006 1:01:11 PM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

-A group of distinguished experts and scholars, including Robert M. Bowman, James H. Fetzer, Wayne Madsen, John McMurtry, Morgan Reynolds, and Andreas von Buelow...-

Are they distinguished because they all wear sweater vests and matching socks, or what? I've never actually heard of any of these fools, but I know a fool when I see or hear one.


33 posted on 01/30/2006 1:02:23 PM PST by AmericanChef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick
I don't know...but I watched the 4 hour program on National Geographic and found it to be quite revealing. Lots of info came forward I'd never seen before.

The net of course was full of conspiracy on 911...for one the buildings COULDN'T collapse without bombs. This program explained it was all about jet fuel. Each plane that hit the towers plus the pentagon was FULL of fuel. After several hours of burning jet fuel in tower 1, the metals were weakened and collapsed that tower. The 2nd tower fall before tower 1 due to where it hit.

The pentagon was hit at such a high rate of speed plus all the jet fuel, there was very little left of that jet. Conspiracy claims it was a missile or a much smaller plane.

That program blew those theories out the window, IMHO.

34 posted on 01/30/2006 1:02:43 PM PST by shield (The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instructions.Pr 1:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

We believe that the Bush administration has staged the most elaborate and effective cover-up in our history, thwarting even our best efforts to uncover it, but other than that we believe they are incompetent morons who can barely feed themselves.


35 posted on 01/30/2006 1:02:51 PM PST by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick
"A group of distinguished experts and scholars, including Robert M. Bowman, James H. Fetzer,..." Article by the ever humble, always self effacing JAMES H. FETZER, who apparently fancies himself a DE&S! Cut me a break.

Not at all surprised that this would come out of the U of M, Duluth, MN. Duluth is often called the "San Francisco of the North". Land of 10,000 looney liberals! Militant
36 posted on 01/30/2006 1:04:29 PM PST by militant2 ("Ted Kennedy is just like one of the family!" Charles Manson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

If there's any conspiracy, the Democrats have more cause to be behind it.

Does anyone else remember what they were screaming right before 9/11? They were complaining that Bush was paying too much attention to nuclear arms and not enough to the possibility of a terrorist attack.

Then, when 9/11 happened, one Dem senator (Carl Levin) immediately gave the "we-told-you-so" response, like "This is what we've been warning all along..."


37 posted on 01/30/2006 1:04:31 PM PST by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

Twin Towers were built to be indestructible, but they both were destroyed. How is this possible?

These guys are nuts and I personally know a guy who buys this junk lock, stock and .....


38 posted on 01/30/2006 1:05:18 PM PST by Integrityrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

So, are we supposed to believe what we all watched on television with our own eyes never happened. Are we supposed to believe that the pile of rubble where the WTC certainly used to be was just an illusion. Are we supposed to believe that 3000 Americans are all in the witness protection program to assist in this "hoax." And most importantly, are we supposed to believe that after eight and a half months in office, that Bush was able to put this whole "hoax" together, and if so, for what purpose? Was all this to start the war with Iraq? The ware with Iraq was based upon Saddam's noncompliance with UN resolutions going back to 1990, if Bush was determined to go to war no matter what, he didn't need to do this.


39 posted on 01/30/2006 1:05:42 PM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

tinfoil hat time!


40 posted on 01/30/2006 1:05:43 PM PST by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

Steel loses 50% of it's carrying capacity at about 1200 F. Jet fuel burns at 1500 F, and this doesn't account for the other fuel (paper, etc.) that might have gotten the temp over 2000 F, causing about 95% in carrying capacity. These guys are lunatics.


41 posted on 01/30/2006 1:06:18 PM PST by ChuckShick (He's clerking for me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: shield

The Pentagon theories also anger me.

A jet plan is not that "stiff" of a vehicle. This jet hit at full speed into the ground. There would not be much left.

I have gone round and round with people on the net, trying to get them to understand little things like physics and building design to understand the 911 attacks. It usually does little good.


42 posted on 01/30/2006 1:07:12 PM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

Insanity. Total, complete insanity.


43 posted on 01/30/2006 1:07:31 PM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redgolum
Elizabeth Holtzman was on the local NPR station today (WNYC in New York) talking about the move to impeach W.

Moonbats on the Left and moonbats on the Right...

44 posted on 01/30/2006 1:08:46 PM PST by kellynch (I am excessively diverted. ~~Jane Austen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: AmericanChef

is that von buelow any relation to claus von buelow of sunny fame?


45 posted on 01/30/2006 1:08:49 PM PST by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick
These guys are lunatics.

I have met a few of them. They claim to know an awful lot about stuff they have no experience or data with.

46 posted on 01/30/2006 1:08:56 PM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

911 didn't happen, but if it did the joos did it.


47 posted on 01/30/2006 1:09:26 PM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Really, it's an impressive list, but, not one Air Traffic Controller. There were at least three ARTCCs involved; Boston, NY and Washinton. Cleveland would make four. The NY TRICON (?) and the Washington Approach Control had folks involved. Tower Controllers at Newark, Laguardia, Dulles, Reagan National and probably many others, were tied into real time events.

Not one Controller has come forward? I believe there was a conspiracy to get JFK, but this is just pure bunk.


48 posted on 01/30/2006 1:09:38 PM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: trebb
In the history of structural engineering, steel-frame high-rise buildings have never been brought down due to fires either before or since 9/11, so how can fires have brought down three in one day? How is this possible?

I still have questions about it, too, and like other disasters, they will forever go unanswered to my satisfaction.

I do not understand how three buildings could pancake like that, especially the smaller one, to some extent, but not completely. It was a near-perfect demolition job, although I think I remember there was some tilt debris involved. I would have expected at least one of the buildings to topple over at a sharp angle. I also do not understand how they found that one hijacker's passport while most everything else was incinerated. The fires make sense because there have never, to my knowledge, been fires that bad in high buildings.

There was some article about cell phones working from planes with the current technology/towers; I'd like a better explanation of that. Since we have alleged recordings, that is pretty off-the-wall to think otherwise, but I'd like to understand it better. Can people talk by cell phone from planes (even though it is probably discouraged/forbidden normally)? I'm not convinced Flight 97? (PA) wasn't shot down, but think it highly probable that passengers of the doomed flight *would* have taken matters into their own hands, whether or not they were able to receive the intelligence at what had already gone down.

I don't know what to make of the Pentagon. There wasn't enough evidence about it released to the public although there are credible eye-witnesses. The wings shearing off makes sense, but I would expect more damage to the facia of the building regardless.

There is a lot of deliberate disinformation out there which further muddies the waters.

49 posted on 01/30/2006 1:09:45 PM PST by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: maineman

Nuts, all of them


50 posted on 01/30/2006 1:10:19 PM PST by toddlintown (Lennon takes six bullets to the chest, Yoko is standing right next to him and not one f'ing bullet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson