[CyberAnt]

Read this and weep Deaniacs ..

DNC Has Received $112,073 From Abramoff Affiliated Lobbying Firms. (Political Money Line Website, www.tray.com, Accessed 1/4/06) ...

DNC Has Received $65,200 ...

DCCC Has Received $629,246 ...

DCCC Has Received $103,746 ...

DCCC Has Received $525,500 ...

DSCC Has Received $434,123 ...

And .. there's even more!

What was that about NO DEMOCRATS GOT ANY ABRAMOFF MONEY.

ROTFLOL!!

[Toadman]

ping for later read

[popdonnelly]

I don't think Howeird will be giving interviews for awhile.

[VOA]

bump

[Mike Darancette]

Dean specifically stated it was 'a big problem' if any Democrats wrote letters on behalf of Abramoff Indian tribes

Wallace was all over that like a duck on a june bug.

Dean is the gift that keeps on giving, always trying to prove a negative.

[GOPJ]

LOL

[68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub]

And now a word from our REAL Sponsors of Free Speech

The Men and Women who serve,
and have served, our country
are the ones who make sure that
the Politicans and Judges are free to do their job.

We would not have a US Supreme Court
without the protection of the Military.

Politicans and Judges are safe
because of the Military who protect them.

TEST : Call your Senator or Congressman's office
AFTER 5 PM, or on the weekend.
IF you speak to an actual person, ask who's in charge today?

Now look up the phone number
of your local military base.
Call that number 24/7
and ask the live voice you get
to speak with the person in charge.

Send a Thank You while you enjoy your Freedom also.


You will stay right where you are on the thread.
Please take a moment and Thank a Service Man or Woman.
Just Click on the graphic to send an e-mail.

[upchuck]

Why Do These Idiots Insist On Capitalizing Every Word They Write? Since When Is This An Accepted Style?

Damned Hard To Read!

[george76]

"Reid is going around the country talking about a 'Republican scandal' — about Republicans accepting one- and two-thousand dollar contributions from Jack Abramoff, when his own PAC took in $60,000," ...

[cricket]

What was that about NO DEMOCRATS GOT ANY ABRAMOFF MONEY.

It is about the who and what of Demrats. . .liars telling lies. . .and as many as they can pack in a 'soundbite' for public consumption.

[kempster]

Wow. A twofer for Michigan. Both our illustrious Senators are implicated. Couldn't happen to two nicer people.

[ElkGroveDan]

Well That's An Interesting Writing Style If Nothing Else. Is This Brian Jones Guy German?

[ohioWfan]

NICELY DONE, CyberAnt!!

The Dems are such hypocrites. This is beautiful!

(But don't worry that Dean will be chastised for these words. RATS are NEVER held accountable for ANYTHING they do or say).

[The Mayor]

BTTT!

[StarfireIV]

Howard! Howard! Don't pour lighter fluid on that......
FOOM!
Um, nevermind.

[NotJustAnotherPrettyFace]

RNC RESEARCH TEAM ROCKS!!!!!!!!

[UglyinLA]

Okay, let me see if I got this right.

The DNCRats are almost out of money.

Because they have made such a big stink about this Indian money, they can no longer accept big money from the Indian tribes without falling under intense scrutiny.

They just cut-off their gravy train. What a bunch of morons.

By the way, where is all of that DNC money? I know they didn't spend it at Walmart.

[polymuser]

Book 'em, Dano.

[Minnesoootan]

"That's A Big Problem, And Those Democrats Are In Trouble, And They Should Be In Trouble, And Our Party, If The American People Will Put Us Back In Power In '06, We Will Have On The President's Desk Things That Outlaw All Those Kinds Of Behaviors." what a blabbering fool this guy is....oh,I got an idea,let's make these "behaviors" double illegal :/

[Robert A Cook PE]

I have seldom seen a "press release" more confusing (and more likely to get ignored!) than this piece of poorly organized, inane list of names, charges, and amounts.

In no order. In no organized or rational pattern.

With NO explanation of (for just ONE example!) of why the same three groups (DNC, DNCC, and DCCC - with no explanation of any of the three, who AREN'T well known to the general public!) received large but different amounts of cash.

Possibly (probably!) at different times. But the same problem happens in every paragraph.

I can (just barely) figure out what the "writer" is thinking, but I've been following the story closely.

Most people have not. And, further, MOST (if not 99.5% of the probable voters) will NOT read this summary because the MSM will filter their reporting and ignore it.

So, who will read it? Who can understand it - if it is sent by email to 100,000 "friends" - how many of them will be able to understand quickly how many democrats got what money form which Abramoff supporters?

[Doogle]