[PatrickHenry]

Interesting that this is from a newspaper in Seattle, the Discovery Institute's home town.

[furball4paws]

This is a good time and place for this article - Thank You.

[JCEccles]

In December, a federal judge presiding over another case of Darwin versus faith in a public-school system handed the antimaterialists a defeat so sweeping—in the form of a judicial decision so detailed and so trenchant—that even the most passionate advocates of faith-based science seem stunned and confused about the future of their cause.

The fool who wrote this understands the law and the precedential effect of a federal district court decision about as well as he understands Intelligent Design.

ID is here to stay. The debate has just begun.

[Mushinronshasan]

Bump for later reading.

[Deadshot Drifter]

What a great read giving a look into the inner workings of the DI and the personal politics of the people behind it.
The posts declaring that ID hasn't yet begun to fight!! were as always, entertaining.

We will delight in the weeping and lamentations of their women. lol

[RogueIsland]

How does intelligent design differ in any significant way from earlier attempts to avoid conflict with the Second Amendment prohibition of state-supported or countenanced religion?

The NRA will be very surprised at this interpretation of the Second Amendment.

[gogeo]

That's Seattle Weekly, the alternative rag.

[editor-surveyor]

It figures that destructive and misleading propaganda like this would come from a radical leftist Seattle paper.

Always consider the source.

[Havoc]

The darwinian equivalent of a VRWC.. lol

[Porterville]

They need to have think tanks now to figure out that there is an intelligent design in nature?