To: beaversmom
Just a question..
What are infants doing at work?
2 posted on
02/02/2006 1:50:33 PM PST by
Mikey_1962
(I grew up in a slum, when I got to college it had become a "ghetto".)
To: beaversmom
I'm going to go make some popcorn and see how long it takes to have breastfeeding compared to urinating.
3 posted on
02/02/2006 1:50:48 PM PST by
WV Mountain Mama
(Here we go Steelers, here we go!!! One for the thumb!!!)
To: beaversmom
More proof that feminazis do not want equal treatment- they want special treatment.
4 posted on
02/02/2006 1:50:55 PM PST by
Diva Betsy Ross
(Embrace peace- Hug an American soldier- the real peace keepers.)
To: beaversmom
I get the feeling something is missing from this article. Are they really talking about mothers breastfeeding at work, or mothers who use a breastpump at work?
5 posted on
02/02/2006 1:51:50 PM PST by
Chiapet
(The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity. -Yeats)
To: beaversmom
So, since this person is trying to pass this law we must assume that this means some mothers are bringing infants that young to their place of employment??
Taking care of infants that young is a 24 hour a day job. How would the mother get any of her employers work done by bringing the infant to work??
Does not sound fair to the employer or the child. Productivity would definitely decrease and quality of care for the infant would decrease. Seems like a lose/lose proposition to me.
13 posted on
02/02/2006 1:55:01 PM PST by
technomage
(NEVER underestimate the depths to which liberals will stoop for power.)
To: beaversmom
I'm still waiting for a journalist to ask
any politician this question: Tell me one subject matter that is
strictly off-limits to government involvement of any sort. One non-trivial matter that you believe is none of the government's business, under any circumstances. Is there even
one?
The bleeding-heart/PC fascism of the Left knows no bounds.
15 posted on
02/02/2006 1:59:11 PM PST by
TChris
("Unless you act, you're going to lose your world." - Mark Steyn)
To: beaversmom
Why doesn't Deanna Hanna stay at home and work on being a Proverbs 31 wife instead of dictating in the Legislature?
To: beaversmom
24 posted on
02/02/2006 2:02:37 PM PST by
Killborn
(Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
To: beaversmom
She's got nothing that I want to see.
How about a paper bag requirement for her?
29 posted on
02/02/2006 2:08:11 PM PST by
peyton randolph
(As long is it does me no harm, I don't care if one worships Elmer Fudd.)
To: beaversmom
"The bill won't require anything elaborate or special, just a quiet room where mothers could go for some privacy." It's called the ladies room.
34 posted on
02/02/2006 2:09:57 PM PST by
Not A Snowbird
(Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
To: beaversmom
Further proof that clear thought evaded the country during the second decade of the 20th century.
16th Amendment. Income taxes. "Nuff said.
17th Amendment. Popular election of Senators. Think of Patty Murray, Carol Mosely Braun for starters.
18th Amendment. Prohibition of alcohol. What were the Senators supposed to drink?
19th Amendment. See italics.
Hanna, a breast-feeding advocate and retired nurse, won passage of a similar measure two years ago. It gave women the right to breast-feed in most public places.
35 posted on
02/02/2006 2:10:50 PM PST by
Jacquerie
(Democrats soil institutions)
To: beaversmom
Deanna Hanna?
If it isn't one thing it's another.
To: beaversmom
Hanna, D-Lakewood, said that accommodating nursing mothers would give infants a healthier start in life, cut down on missed days at work to care for sick infants and save on medical costs. Why not?
Laws are being passed wholesale across our country now, based on assertions (no scientific proof whatsoever) by moonbats, the insane and the neurotic.
No need to go beyond this story for specifics.
To: onef
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson