Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Tenth Planet' found to be a whopper
news@nature.com ^ | 1 February 2006 | Mark Peplow

Posted on 02/02/2006 9:25:14 PM PST by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-126 next last
To: Irish_Thatcherite

Yes.
But it asserts that the star comes close to Earth, like between Jupiter and Mars close, and that isn't possible.
I'd assume it has a near constant orbit, if it is elliptical it'd only come possibly as close as the outer edge of the Kuiper belt.
The theory is based off the periodic bombardment of the inner solar system byy waves of debris.


81 posted on 02/03/2006 1:07:03 PM PST by Darksheare (Aim low! They got knees!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
The theory is based off the periodic bombardment of the inner solar system byy waves of debris.

I recall reading that - it happens once every 26 million years or so.

82 posted on 02/03/2006 1:12:04 PM PST by Irish_Thatcherite (~~~A vote for Bertie Ahern is a vote for Gerry Adams!~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

83 posted on 02/03/2006 1:14:52 PM PST by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irish_Thatcherite

Yes.
Some object or not yet understood process disturbs the oort cloud enough to fling stuff our way like Thors Hammer on meth.
Of course, we have no real idea what is out there really beyond Neptune, and we continually find things even closer in.
But it would be interesting to see what else we have out there.


84 posted on 02/03/2006 1:16:05 PM PST by Darksheare (Aim low! They got knees!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Sure. So Cere's (roughly) spherical shape and a moon (if any are found) would help re-classify it as a planet.

Venus and Mercury are "classic" planets - so they can't be "undesignated" just because they have no moon.

Thus, it wouldn't make sense to Un-designate Pluto (which has a big moon and is spherical) just because another larger planet with a moon is found further out.
85 posted on 02/03/2006 1:31:23 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
See, finding any sort of "moon" around Ceres would call for a wholesale "renaming" of several planet-like bodies - which allows Pluto to be kept, add Ceres, add Xena ... etc.

Actually there is an asteroid with a "moom" that was imaged by the Galileo probe on its way to Jupiter.

Basically, there is no scientific definition of a planet, because it's not a scientific term. The word is really just a holdover from astrology, which referred to celestial objects, including the moon and sun, that moved through the background constellations (or "houses", in their terminology). The principal of them was the sun - whichever constellation the sun was in when you were born is your "sign". But the other planets had their own special powers or whatever depending on their absolute and relative locations ("When the moon is in the seventh house, and Jupiter aligns with Mars" and all that).

86 posted on 02/03/2006 1:44:09 PM PST by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: inquest
That should be, "asteroid with a 'moon'". No, I don't know what a "moom" is.
87 posted on 02/03/2006 1:46:56 PM PST by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
Of course, we have no real idea what is out there really beyond Neptune, and we continually find things even closer in.
But it would be interesting to see what else we have out there.

I'll bet we don't know the half of it!!

88 posted on 02/03/2006 2:48:00 PM PST by Irish_Thatcherite (~~~A vote for Bertie Ahern is a vote for Gerry Adams!~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Well the solution isn't to take Pluto's status as a planet away.....just go ahead and declare 10 a planet too. What's so fsking hard about that?
89 posted on 02/03/2006 2:51:02 PM PST by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
My grandmother, who was born in the 1800's reminded me of the temporary nature of much of what we scientifically "know." She mentioned a couple of times that most scientific discussions should end with "we think." One of the examples she gave me was that when she was in school, they were taught that there were seven planets. Back in the 1960's, she told me there were probably more planets than nine.

My grandmother was born in 1894 and died in the 1970's. She read about the Wright brother's flight when it was current news, and saw the first moon landing. Altogether, that was an incredible time to be alive.

90 posted on 02/03/2006 3:01:02 PM PST by Richard Kimball (Look, Daddy! Teacher says every time a Kennedy talks, a Republican gets a house seat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

I too have heard the name Xena mentioned for UB313. Probably on the Discovery Channel, maybe on the news.


91 posted on 02/03/2006 3:07:21 PM PST by delacoert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Termite_Commander

It's Hugh and Series...


92 posted on 02/03/2006 3:11:08 PM PST by null and void (If the Muslim world can be brought to its knees by 12 cartoons, let's give them a whole comic book!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: delacoert
The little rock causing a galactic storm - It's been named after the warrior princess. But the only fighting involved with Xena is between scientists, bitterly divided as to whether she is our latest planet, or just a jumped-up asteroid.
93 posted on 02/03/2006 3:13:01 PM PST by delacoert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; SunkenCiv; KevinDavis; RightWhale; Darksheare; Irish_Thatcherite

Well, if a moon can be a moon, regardless of size, why shouldn't a planet be a planet, regardless of size?

What do you call something that orbits a moon? (A satellite?)

Pluto could still be in trouble, if evidence indicates it's a "rogue moon."

By the way, I heard today that they were making a satellite out of an old space-suit. It's supposed to be active on the HAM radio bands. They missed a bet if they didn't put a video camera in it.


94 posted on 02/03/2006 3:38:38 PM PST by NicknamedBob (And then I sat down and I wrote this report, ‘cause I knew that you’d want all the facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

"Makes me wonder what else is lurking out there, and how large."


I instantly thought of God when I read your sentence.


95 posted on 02/03/2006 3:42:20 PM PST by diamond6 (Everyone who is for abortion have been born. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Irish_Thatcherite

Same here.


96 posted on 02/03/2006 3:45:39 PM PST by Darksheare (Aim low! They got knees!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: diamond6

Yes, He would come to mind.
But one could say he isn't lurking out there, but is here due to omnipresence.
So that would be a bit of a head scratcher as to whether you would classify Him as being lurking out there or being here instead.

Of course, knowing He has a sense of humor as evidenced by the platypus and the pangolin, I wouldn't be surprised to find some truly strange celestial objects hanging out beyond the orbit of the Kuiper belt.
(Seriously, the pangolin looks like an ant eater with bad eczema. I can't see one without laughing.)


97 posted on 02/03/2006 3:52:55 PM PST by Darksheare (Aim low! They got knees!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: NicknamedBob
Pluto could still be in trouble, if evidence indicates it's a "rogue moon."

It will be fine if it goes before the UN Security Council!!

98 posted on 02/03/2006 3:54:28 PM PST by Irish_Thatcherite (~~~A vote for Bertie Ahern is a vote for Gerry Adams!~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

So much for my horoscope!
99 posted on 02/03/2006 3:55:53 PM PST by hookman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: hookman

LOL!

That just brought to mind the Weird Al song "Your Horoscope For Today".
(And once again proving I have way too much stuff moving in my head concurrently..)


100 posted on 02/03/2006 3:57:48 PM PST by Darksheare (Aim low! They got knees!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson