Posted on 02/03/2006 2:56:16 PM PST by jdege
by Faith Okpotor
February 3, 2006
Many - perhaps most - Chicago aldermen have chosen not to exercise their statutory right to carry a weapon.
Most, that is, except the fiery, hat-wearing alderman from the Third Ward.
Dorothy Tillman startled those present at a Police and Fire Committee meeting of the Chicago City Council several years ago, an aldermanic aide recalled, when the issue of aldermen owning guns was broached.
"I carry a gun," she announced, pulling a pistol out of her purse.
A survey of all 50 aldermen had one aldermanic aide - not from Tillman's office - say, "You should talk to Tillman. Tillman is your girl."
Despite the fact that it is illegal for ordinary citizens to carry concealed weapons in Chicago, it's different for alderman. An 1872 state law allows aldermen and other municipal officials, as peace officers, to carry guns, make arrests and detain suspects "after receiving a certificate attesting to the successful completion of a training course administered by the Illinois Law Enforcement Training Standards Board."
Sheila Albright, an assistant to the director of the training standards board, said her agency does not have a record of how many municipal officials have guns, nor of how many have undergone the necessary training.
Some aldermen who do not personally bear arms said they understand why others would want to.
"I don't need one," said Ald. Brian Doherty (41st), the lone City Council Republican from the far Northwest Side. "I feel secure in this area." But Doherty said he would carry a gun if he lived in a high-crime neighborhood.
"In this position we don't have bodyguards," Doherty said. "[Aldermen with guns] have the ability to defend themselves." He added that Ald. Edward Burke (14th), chairman of the Finance Committee, and Tillman both carry guns. Neither Burke nor Tillman returned numerous calls seeking comment.
Burke also has the distinction of being the only alderman with a security detail from the Chicago Police Department.
Of the 15 aldermen who responded to inquiries, 14 said they do not have guns, six said they had no problem with aldermen being allowed to carry concealed weapons and two disagree with the idea altogether.
Those two, Toni Preckwinkle (4th) and Latasha Thomas (17th), were vocal.
"I am a big supporter of gun control," Preckwinkle said curtly, "and I don't carry a gun."
Thomas said, "I am not a fan of guns. I don't think I need it. I use the police just like any other citizen." Thomas also said it is unnecessary for aldermen to pack heat, and that if the matter ever came before her, she would vote to repeal the law.
Ald. Anthony Beale (9th), being a hunter, has guns and a firearms identification card, said Rich Ringer, his spokesman. But Ringer said Beale does not carry concealed weapons on his person as a peace officer.
Another alderman opposed to guns is Walter Burnett Jr. (27th).
"I am totally against it," Burnett said, adding, however, that he would not criticize his colleagues who have chosen to own guns. "It has an effect on people's emotions. They get confrontational when they have a gun."
Emotions definitely ran wild on one occasion. Tillman allegedly brandished her gun during a shouting and shoving match at a ward redistricting meeting in November 1991. She allegedly pulled a .38-caliber snub-nosed revolver. The incident resulted in a reference to Chicago by a Washington Post writer as the "wild, wild (Mid)west."
Perhaps the most remarkable thing over the 134 years the law has been in effect is that no gunfights have taken place during a City Council meeting or the often contentious committee meetings - such as deliberations for the recently passed smoking ban.
Former state Rep. Lee Preston, D-Chicago, now a Cook County judge, said he unsuccessfully tried to repeal the law when he was serving in the General Assembly. Preston said his measure failed because aldermen were successful in getting their legislators to protect their clout.
"It is bizarre," Preston said. "It makes absolutely no sense. They have badges, they can initiate arrests. The law is archaic. It ought to be repealed. If it makes you feel safer that aldermen are out there carrying guns without training..."
Mayor Richard M. Daley and Gov. Rod Blagojevich have recently repeated calls to ban assault weapons in Illinois. According to a Chicago Police Department 2004 murder analysis report, 313 of the 448 murders in Chicago were committed using handguns, not assault weapons.
Gun control opponents have criticized a policy that allows aldermen, but not ordinary citizens, to bear arms.
Ald. Ariel Reboyras (30th) has a gun license dating back to his days as director of security for the city's water purification plant, but said he never purchased one.
However, he said: "I think it is a good law. We are protecting individuals."
"I carry my badge everywhere," Reboyras added as he pulled the badge from his pocket and read from its insignia: "City of Chicago, Alderman."
Faith Okpotor is a reporter for the Medill News Service.
>>
Despite the fact that it is illegal for ordinary citizens to carry concealed weapons in Chicago, it's different for alderman. An 1872 state law allows aldermen and other municipal officials, as peace officers, to carry guns, make arrests and detain suspects "after receiving a certificate attesting to the successful completion of a training course administered by the Illinois Law Enforcement Training Standards Board."
<<
One law for us, another law for the rest of you.
Oh yes, some pigs are more equal than others.
I guess I missed the part of the Constitution that restricted the second amendment to aldermen and other municipal officials.
Exactly why the second ammendment was put into the constitution.
I'd like to see a push to get this "loophole" repealed. I wonder what HCI et al. would say?
These politicians need to be mugged. Brutally.
"I guess I missed the part of the Constitution that restricted the second amendment to aldermen and other municipal officials."
Isn't that odd? I was thinking last night, whose right to bear arms is being infringed?
Federal Government? Nope.
State and Local Government? Nope.
The People? Yep.
"The right of the People to bear arms shall not be infringed".
There are many circumstances in this nation of ours that are, more and more often, beginning to be very similar to pre-WWII Germany!
OH...so THAT is what you're talking about! Ah...like I was saying...it's not original. :-) I read it somewhere else. But it's a good point still!
Ping...
A true "ban" would forbid everyone from having an "assault weapon", am I correct in believing that the police will still have these weapons and that the "ban" is really just disarming the subjects?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.