No Beheadings, Please, We’re British.
Appeasing Muslim extremists means surrendering Western liberties.
Theodore Dalrymple
6 February 2006
Posted on 02/08/2006 8:42:19 PM PST by neverdem
|
|
City Journal No Beheadings, Please, We’re British. Appeasing Muslim extremists means surrendering Western liberties. Theodore Dalrymple 6 February 2006 |
The weekend edition of Le Monde carried on its front page a startling photograph of a masked protester in London, holding up a placard demanding the death of those who insult Islam. Policemen flanked him on either side, as if protecting him from the vicious assaults of cartoonists.
Nothing could have captured better the cowardly and pusillanimous response of the British government to the crisis deliberately stirred up in many Muslim countries four months after the publication in a Danish newspaper of 12 cartoons depicting Muhammad (only one of which was remotely funny).
In condemning the cartoons, Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, a man with all the qualities of Neville Chamberlain except his fundamental decency, attempted to curry favor with the Muslim world, or at least to avoid its wrath. Revealing the practical value of such appeasement is the way in which Muslims burned down the Danish consulates and embassies even after the Danes, with equal cowardice, had apologized. But at least the Danes have the excuse of being a very small nation indeed—although their country produces far more, oil excepted, than the whole Arab world put together.
Instead of protecting the protester (whose placard, incidentally, was comparatively moderate compared with some others), the police should surely have arrested him for incitement to murder. After all, the cartoonists who had “insulted” Islam were individuals known to the public: in the context, the protester must have been referring to them. Even if the subsequent prosecution did not ultimately succeed, it would remind Muslim extremists in Britain that they remain subject to the law of the land just like anyone else.
This, of course, is not the first time the British government has allowed Muslim extremists to incite murder in Britain. When Muslims marched through the streets of Bradford to demand the implementation of Ayatollah Khomenei’s thuggish fatwa against Salman Rushdie, the British government did nothing, giving the impression—so far an impression that has proven fully justified—that it is too weak and lacking in self-belief to defend itself. Two thirds of a century later, the lessons of Munich have not been learned.
The supposition that the kind of people who call publicly for beheadings, or tell Europe to prepare itself for the real holocaust (the connection between Muslim extremism and Holocaust denial being a very strong one), will feel placated by a few expressions of sympathy for their supposedly offended feelings is psychologically preposterous and demonstrably false empirically. It is the reductio ad absurdum of the Clintonian propensity to feel other people’s pain as a substitute for a policy.
At some point, we shall have to confront the threat directly, unapologetically and vigorously. If we don’t, it will be our own pain that we shall feel, not the pain of other people. And, in a sense, we shall have got what we asked for.
Even the Bush administration followed the politically correct responses in this situation, saying the cartoons were offensive, etc. Embarassing.
Slightly different title, but a duplicate. Dalrymple rules!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1574509/posts
Yes, he has a way with the pen (I put him up there with Steyn), but you also have to admit that this stuff writes itself these days.
"Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, a man with all the qualities of Neville Chamberlain except his fundamental decency"
My favorite line.
"In condemning the cartoons, Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, a man with all the qualities of Neville Chamberlain except his fundamental decency
"And, in a sense, we shall have got what we asked for."
Do you think the islamofascists would be more respectful if you told them that as Christians it was against your religion to have your head cut off with a dull knife? Maybe we could reason with them in light their call for us to understand their religious requirements in the media.
bttt
That's gonna leave a welt. This is more than a throwaway insult, it's fundamentally true: today's politicians are whores without a scrap of honor. They're just interested in a vote or a buck, and will sell out anything that hinders their career. That's why they'll cave to these Muslims rather than to stand up for any principle. I mean, principles? What's in it for them? Of course they rule over nations without any sense of national pride, nations that no longer even care if they continue to exist, thanks in large part to the media and these politicians.
Thanks for the link.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.