Skip to comments.
US lists 10 foiled terror plots
BBC News on line ^
| October 10, 2005
| Unsigned
Posted on 02/09/2006 9:27:58 AM PST by aculeus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
This is not new, but worthy of a posting.
1
posted on
02/09/2006 9:27:59 AM PST
by
aculeus
To: aculeus
"But the sketchy details provided by the White House make it hard to assess how serious or advanced the plans were."
It seems while W is President, the media will always insert a "But."
2
posted on
02/09/2006 9:30:24 AM PST
by
sono
(Ted Kennedy's naming his dog Splash is like Jack Abramoff naming his dog Bribe.)
To: sono
You don't understand. A spoiled little brat that attended journalism school at a private college and now works for the MSM knows WAY more than the CIA, NSA, FBI and Pentagon combined.
3
posted on
02/09/2006 9:33:42 AM PST
by
relictele
To: aculeus
#11: John Kerry's candidacy defeated.
4
posted on
02/09/2006 9:34:06 AM PST
by
Texas dog
To: aculeus
...the so-called war on terror.Stopped reading there.
5
posted on
02/09/2006 9:35:54 AM PST
by
randog
(What the....?!)
To: aculeus
But the sketchy details provided by the White House make it hard to assess how serious or advanced the plans were Not to worry .. those members of Congress that were informed yesterday will be sure to leak it all very soon
6
posted on
02/09/2006 9:36:22 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
To: sono
7
posted on
02/09/2006 9:37:03 AM PST
by
Fresh Wind
(Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
To: aculeus
"... the so-called war on terror."
"So-called?" Well, if it's not called the war on terror, then what IS it called? Oh, that's right: the war on the third world. At least, that's what you believe if you're a moonbat.
8
posted on
02/09/2006 9:37:23 AM PST
by
Terpfen
(72-25: The Democrats mounted a failibuster!)
To: aculeus
I bet that the NEW YORK SLIMES can't wait to publish all the details so the terrorists have better luck next time.
9
posted on
02/09/2006 9:38:47 AM PST
by
doug from upland
(INDICTING HILLARY -- now that is something that's good for America)
To: Terpfen
"So-called?" Well, if it's not called the war on terror, then what IS it called? Just more proof these nit wits refuse to face reality
10
posted on
02/09/2006 9:40:36 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
To: aculeus; All
Y'all remember all those British Airways flights that were turned back and kept from coming here?
11
posted on
02/09/2006 9:44:48 AM PST
by
eastforker
(Under Cover FReeper going dark(too much 24))
To: randog
Ditto- so did I. Detestable, so-called journalists.
12
posted on
02/09/2006 9:47:06 AM PST
by
SE Mom
(God Bless those who serve..)
To: relictele
A spoiled little brat that attended journalism school at a private college in order to bring about social justice and change,
and now works for the MSM knows WAY more than the CIA, NSA, FBI and Pentagon combined.
13
posted on
02/09/2006 9:52:29 AM PST
by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: sono
That's becuase they are all a bunch of BUTTS!!!
14
posted on
02/09/2006 9:55:26 AM PST
by
cubreporter
(I trust Rush. He has done more for this country than any of us will ever know. Go Rush!)
To: Terpfen
"So-called?" Didn't the administration try to change the marketing on this to another name not long ago?
To: antiRepublicrat
If they did, I missed it.
16
posted on
02/09/2006 9:58:25 AM PST
by
Terpfen
(72-25: The Democrats mounted a failibuster!)
To: Terpfen
If they did, I missed it. It was "Global Struggle Against Extremism" or something like that. They used it for a while and dropped it. I guess it didn't catch. I for one was glad to see someone draw back from the overused "War on XX" phrase.
To: cubreporter
Mr Bush cited the disrupted plans in a speech, designed to boost support for the so-called war on terror. What a piece of trash? We arent against terror apparently.. oh thats right.
This wreaks of the loonys screaming "NO WAR FOR OIL". After all, we couldnt possibly be trying to end terror attacks on the US, could we.
18
posted on
02/09/2006 10:02:56 AM PST
by
thehumanlynx
(“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.” -Edmund Burke)
To: thehumanlynx
19
posted on
02/09/2006 10:04:57 AM PST
by
cubreporter
(I trust Rush. He has done more for this country than any of us will ever know. Go Rush!)
To: aculeus
so-called war on terror. The result of the so-called attacks on NYC on 9-11-01.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson