Skip to comments.
US lists 10 foiled terror plots
BBC News on line ^
| October 10, 2005
| Unsigned
Posted on 02/09/2006 9:27:58 AM PST by aculeus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: cubreporter
crap. nice catch. Thats why I bolded the "Mr." I meant to comment on the lack of respect. I hate when reporters say Mister Bush, while they will say "former President Sadaam".
that is what I was going to type, had I not overlooked it.
21
posted on
02/09/2006 10:18:07 AM PST
by
thehumanlynx
(“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.” -Edmund Burke)
To: aculeus
BBC: A so-called "news organization".
To: aculeus
23
posted on
02/09/2006 10:23:44 AM PST
by
proudpapa
(of three.)
To: sono
It seems while W is President, the media will always insert a "But." That is because they are all ASS .
To: thehumanlynx
Ahhhh, it's OK. Ha,ha. You are right the idiots call him Mr. Bush although he IS a Mr. AND.... a Gentleman. So, President or Mr. would in essence be correct.
25
posted on
02/09/2006 10:29:40 AM PST
by
cubreporter
(I trust Rush. He has done more for this country than any of us will ever know. Go Rush!)
To: aculeus
Mr Bush cited the disrupted plans in a speech, designed to boost support for the so-called war on terror. So called? So called war or "war on terror" The war is quite real. Of course it's not really on Terror, which is a tactic, but rather on terrorists, who are uniformly radical Islamic jihadists.
26
posted on
02/09/2006 10:35:10 AM PST
by
El Gato
To: Texas dog
#11: John Kerry's candidacy defeated.
well said!
27
posted on
02/09/2006 10:43:54 AM PST
by
VOA
To: sono
Took the words right out of my mount.
28
posted on
02/09/2006 10:43:57 AM PST
by
SueRae
To: antiRepublicrat
Would "Islamo-Occidental War" be too accurate for the MSM and politically correct crowd?
29
posted on
02/09/2006 10:48:58 AM PST
by
oldbill
To: oldbill
Would "Islamo-Occidental War" be too accurate for the MSM and politically correct crowd? Nah, the terrorists are going after the Orient, too. They're against anyone. Hell, they're going after Denmark, about the most harmless country in the world.
To: sono
"But the sketchy details provided by the White House make it hard to assess how serious or advanced the plans were." It seems while W is President, the media will always insert a "But."
And things are always "sketchy", "risky", a "scheme", etc. THe MSM is sooo pathetic (even abroad).
31
posted on
02/09/2006 12:06:00 PM PST
by
Anti-MSM
(Conservatives wish 9-11 never happened-liberals pretend it didn't!)
To: thehumanlynx
There's a moment in the Dan Rather-Saddam Hussein interview.
The translator explicitly says "Mr. Bush" instead of President Bush. Before the point has even been explained, Dan Rather chimes in with "I know why you refer to him that way" (as in, "me too!").
32
posted on
02/09/2006 12:50:47 PM PST
by
weegee
(We are all Danes now.)
To: relictele
Your not exactly correct
A spoiled little English brat that attended journalism school at a private college in Great Britian and now works for the BBC knows WAY more than the CIA, NSA, FBI and Pentagon combined.
There! No American spells airplanes...aeroplanes
To: antiRepublicrat
I for one was glad to see someone draw back from the overused "War on XX" phrase.How about, "The Twenty-first Century Crusade."
34
posted on
02/09/2006 2:10:49 PM PST
by
HIDEK6
To: antiRepublicrat
I for one was glad to see someone draw back from the overused "War on XX" phrase.How about, "The Twenty-first Century Crusade."
35
posted on
02/09/2006 2:10:51 PM PST
by
HIDEK6
To: aculeus
I find it amazing that the Muzzies think they could ever again hijack an airliner in America .
36
posted on
02/09/2006 2:15:32 PM PST
by
numberonepal
(Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
To: aculeus; Coop
But the sketchy details provided by the White House make it hard to assess how serious or advanced the plans were.Thank God they are ~ what does this nutcase think? That all the details should be out there for public (read: the enemy's) consumption?? Hello idiot, we are at war. Good grief!!
37
posted on
02/09/2006 4:16:21 PM PST
by
StarCMC
(Old Sarge is my hero...doing it right in Iraq! Vaya con Dios, Sarge.)
To: Terpfen
If you're a moonbat you believe the problem is the muslim nations are not rich enough yet and that if we'd just start bankrolling them with US tax dollars this whole problem would be solved..................
I was lurking in a prominent moonbat cave a few nights back and one in-DUH-vidual was insisting it would be no big deal if Iran got the A-Bomb because they'd never use it. To do so would be suicidal ergo they'd never use it. This particular person is the only one left in the world to not have heard of "Suicide Attacks" by ragtops.
38
posted on
02/09/2006 6:14:26 PM PST
by
festus
(The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
To: aculeus
Nothing new. I saw this on ABC. . . .These pain pills are making me real smart now.
To: eastforker
Yes I do, but the rocket scientists at he MSM can't quite get a clue. Liberal pigs.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson