Skip to comments.'MAKE IT A RULE'-PLACE YOUR ORDER FOR OSAMA W/ CLINTON + CO. (HEAR HILLARY + BILL MAKE THEIR PITCH)
Posted on 02/13/2006 8:45:20 AM PST by Mia T
'MAKE IT A RULE' TO PLACE YOUR ORDER FOR OSAMA WITH CLINTON and CO.
(HEAR HILLARY + BILL MAKE THEIR PITCH)
THE (oops!) INADVERTENT ADMISSIONS OF BILL + HILLARY CLINTON (HEAR HILLARY IN SF) ~PART ONE~
THE FAILED, DYSFUNCTIONAL CLINTON PRESIDENCY
(DECONSTRUCTING CLINTON'S HOFSTRA SPEECH) -- part1: clinton's "Brinkley" Lie
AFTERWORD: ON CLINTON SMALLNESS
(BRINKLEY MISSES THE POINT)
WHY DID BILL CLINTON IGNORE TERRORISM?
Was it simply the constraints of his liberal mindset, or was it something even more threatening to our national security?
IT TAKES A CLINTON TO RAZE A COUNTRY
BIN LADEN FINGERS CLINTON FOR TERROR SUCCESS (SEE FOOTAGE)
THE THREAT OF TERRORISM IS AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON IS TO THE OVAL OFFICE
PRESIDENTIAL FAILURE, 9/11 + KATRINA
I M P E A C H M E N T
h e a r --c l i n t o n --l o s e --i t
'HIATUS' FOR HILLARY?
WHY HILLARY MUST NOT WIN. WHY HILLARY CANNOT WIN.
HILLARY'S EXPOSED LEFT FLANK 'SCARES THE HORSES' (VIDEO)
(MISSUS CLINTON SUPPORTS ALITO FILIBUSTER)
ON THE FICTIONALIZED MEMOIR (HEAR HILLARY IN SF)~PART TWO~
THE (oops!) INADVERTENT ADMISSIONS OF HILLARY AND JANE IN SAN FRANCISCO
CLINTON 'CULTURE OF CORRUPTION'
LET'S ALL WRITE IN CAPS!!!!!!!!!!!
Mia T. Bump.
Bill Clinton was allowed to be POTUS, only because Chuck Norris took an eight year nap.
great segue ;)
click image for flashmovie
My daughter saw your Hillary picture last night, and recoiled in horror. (She's old enough to recoil in horror, just.)
The clintons, themselves, call for lowercase.
Their ABUSES OF POWER and UTTER FAILURES call for caps.
AGHHHH! Have mercy on me, I spent the weekend talking about lesbians, sex, teenagers, etc. in a church bathroom!
Go ahead, ask ; )
well, then, hillary - bill oughta stay outa there!!! huh!!!
by Gail Wynand
Liberals have always had problems figuring out causation. They believe for example that because people who smoke (sometimes) have higher rates of cancer than people who don't that smoking CAUSES cancer, worse, they believe that if people get cancer it is the fault of the "tobacco companies" (i.e., caused by the manufactures of tobacco products). They further believe that the remedy for this fault is that billions of dollars in "damages" should be transferred from the wealth of stockholders in tobacco companies to a handful of plaintiffs lawyers including the First Lady's relatives and others closely associated with the Democratic party. And they believe, apparently, that if young people are now experimenting with sex at early ages and with more profoundly explicit practices than in past years, and that if the President of the United States decides to enroll a young intern in rendition of such services to his middle aged libido resultantly staining both her dress and America's reputation, that a spontaneous wave of teenage sex experimentation, sucked (sorry) the poor middle aged chief executive into its vortex.
Deducing causation in most events takes deliberate, focused, thought, insight, and a disciplined intelligence that doesnt skip foundational indoctrination (aka actually studying in school). Causation of the diseases associated with cancer is highly complex and to a large degree still unknown. That smoking is probably not healthy for you is well known. That a middle aged chief executive, Yale Law School graduate, former professor of Constitutional Law and State Attorney General should be responsible and accountable for his own actions including HIS perjury and obstruction of justice would seem axiomatic to all but a liberal who has the capacity to adopt causationally convenient theories based solely on tangential proximity to the event under examination rather than through any rational analysis of the importance or significance of the asserted cause to the event. Thus, "guns" are used in some murders therefore, to a liberal all "guns" should be either banned or kept in locked safes with trigger locks so as to disarm the law abiding public and eviscerate their legally recognized right to effective self defense.
Quite simply, one has to be pretty stupid or very corrupt or both to be a liberal, at least and for sure to be a Clinton supporter. But it is worse than that, one also has to deny the importance of human consciousness and free will. That is, a Clinton defending liberal apparently believes that childhood psychic trauma, teenage sex trends (remarkably and largely only rampant among the social classes targeted by liberals for social intervention for the past 40 years) and the power of "addiction" which used to be considered merely "habituation" in more stalwart times, are more significant than free will in determining human conduct.
note the video
Although it is true it struggled only with a couple hundred million slavering Arabs -- and was spared the froth-and-foam-flecked followers of feminism's first frontspiece and her Hot-Springs' whorehouse conceived companion codpiece -- let's not forget it took Israel's and the world's finest-ever intelligence service decades to catch, not the tallest man in Afghanistan -- but the mass-murderer of millions and the most evil in Human History.
Another great job, Mia T. Wish you owned the New York Times.
The Times' 1996 endorsement of bill clinton1 was the problem. The endorsement, you may recall, was contingent on clinton getting a brain transplant--specifically of the character lobe.2 How could The Times square that shameful, irresponsible endorsement with this monstrous failure3?
This legacy confab is in and of itself proof certain of clinton's deeply flawed character, and a demonstration in real time of the way in which the clinton years were about a legacy that was incidentally a presidency.
Madeleine Albright captured the essence of this dysfunctional presidency best when she explained why clinton couldn't go after bin Laden.
According to Richard Miniter, the Albright revelation occurred at the cabinet meeting that would decide the disposition of the USS Cole bombing by al Qaeda [that is to say, that would decide to do what it had always done when a "bimbo" was not spilling the beans on the clintons: Nothing]. Only Clarke wanted to retaliate militarily for this unambiguous act of war.
Albright explained that a [sham] Mideast accord would yield [if not peace for the principals, surely] a Nobel Peace Prize for clinton. Kill or capture bin Laden and clinton could kiss the 'accord' and the Peace Prize good-bye.
If clinton liberalism, smallness, cowardice, corruption, perfidy--and, to borrow a phrase from Andrew Cuomo, clinton cluelessness--played a part, it was, in the end, the Nobel Peace Prize that produced the puerile pertinacity that enabled the clintons to shrug off terrorism's global danger.
<< This ... is [All] proof certain .... and a demonstration ... of the [Simple fact] ... the clinton years were [Only] .... incidentally 'a presidency' ....
... Fellating Kids and clinton Degeneracy: The Revisionism [contiues] >>
... If clinton liberalism, smallness, perfidy, cowardice, corruption .... [And, to quote Cuomo] clinton cluelessness--[Contributed], ... the Nobel Peace Prize ... produced the puerile pertinacity that [Permitted the perfidious] clintons to shrug off terrorism's global danger. :)
Ps seem espectially apt for this application, alliteratively speaking.
FOUND THE 'TALLEST MAN' IN 2000.
BUT YOU REALLY DIDN'T WANT TO TAKE HIM OUT, DID YOU?
Drone may have spotted bin Laden in 2000
CIA to investigate leak of tape to media
From David Ensor
The CIA often investigates when unauthorized material is leaked to the media, U.S. officials said.
No decision has been made on whether the matter would be referred to the U.S. Department of Justice.
NBC News aired the footage Tuesday. CNN has broadcast it as well.
The video, taken from an unarmed and unmanned surveillance aircraft over Tarnak Farm in Afghanistan in the fall of 2000, shows a tall man dressed in a white robe.
A senior intelligence official said the tape is genuine and that analysts think the figure in white is bin Laden.
The sprawling agricultural complex was a meeting place for senior al Qaeda leaders, and a training camp for scores of al Qaeda operatives.
Pentagon and CIA officials have copies of the videotape.
The possibility that the figure in the tape might have been bin Laden helped speed the decision to arm the Predator drone aircraft with "Hellfire" missiles, which can be fired by remote control, officials said.
With the technology available in 2000, it would have taken three to seven hours to strike the Tarnak Farm site with cruise missiles or bombs, U.S officials said.
In 1998, President Clinton ordered cruise missile strikes on suspected terrorist training camps in eastern in Afghanistan where intelligence suggested bin Laden might be. In the time it took for the cruise missiles to reach their target, officials say bin Laden moved to another location. [Ask Albright this: Did the Nobel-Peace-Prize-recipient-wannabe give bin Laden the heads up?] That attack killed at least 21 Pakistanis, but missed bin Laden.
In November 2002, the CIA used an armed Predator to execute a senior al Qaeda official who was riding in a car in Yemen.
Steve Coll, in his recently published book "Ghost Wars," says that the Clinton administration at one time planned to seize bin Laden at Tarnak Farm but never carried out the mission, in part over concerns about killing innocent women and children, as well as legal disagreements within the administration. [Ask Albright this: Did the Nobel-Peace-Prize-recipient-wannabe really ever want to take out bin Laden, anyway?]
looking for an active link to this video or its file. If anyone has it, kindly post or send. thx.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.