Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fallaci Decapitated: Emblem of the New Europe
HUMAN EVENTS ^ | Feb 14, 2006 | Robert Spencer

Posted on 02/14/2006 10:40:54 PM PST by neverdem

An art show in Milan has illustrated once again the deep affinity between the Left and the forces of the global jihad. As Muslims the world over call for the deaths of those who have "insulted Islam," anyone who wants to see the author of the seminal post-9/11 books The Rage and the Pride and The Force of Reason beheaded can go to the Galleria Luciano Inga-Pin in Milan, which is exhibiting Giuseppe Veneziano's "American Beauty" from January 19 through March 18. This is a series of paintings designed to highlight the "weakness and perversity of the 'American way of life'" -- including Oriana Fallaci's decapitated head.

Although I find the picture of Fallaci decapitated offensive, I have no plans to attack the Italian embassy, boycott Italian wine, phone in a bomb threat to the gallery, kill innocent people who had nothing to with the painting, or threaten to kill those who are actually responsible for it. Veneziano's painting is the sort of obnoxiousness that has become commonplace on the Left, and is one of the prices of freedom of speech.

Veneziano’s painting is doubly offensive, however, in light of the fact that Fallaci herself has been driven out of Italy by frivolous charges that she has "defamed Islam." Veneziano is not on trial for depicting Fallaci decapitated, but Fallaci faces trial for making a series of heated but largely true statements about Islam and Muslims. Veneziano’s painting is triply offensive in that it depicts exactly what the Muslim exponents of cartoon rage around the world would like to see done to Fallaci -- and thus manifests the ever-closer empathy between the Western Left and Islamic jihad.

Both the Left and the mujahedin envision a totalitarian state that cleanses the world of evil by force, establishing a just society at the price of an unspecified number of dead. Both advocate a supremacist ideology unable to tolerate criticism from others. And now as the European Union contemplates new laws that will, in the words of Franco Frattini, EU Commissioner for Justice, Freedom, and Security, "give the Muslim world the message: We are aware of the consequences of exercising the right of free expression," the marriage of the European Left and Islamic jihad can proceed all the more speedily. Frattini has since denied that the EU has any such plans, but there can be no denying that voices all over the West have called for the media to exercise "responsible self-regulation" so as to avoid trampling upon Muslim sensibilities. But Muslim sensibilities only: those who depict Fallaci beheaded, or Jesus Christ with the face of Osama bin Laden, will continue to be subject to the same protections enunciated by Josh Wainwright, the producer of the art show that featured the Christ/Osama painting: "I don't think it's anyone's job or vocation to limit the expression of artists." Right. Except cartoon artists, of course. Or at least those who have the temerity to suggest that there might be some connection between violent actions done by Islamic jihadists and the Prophet who said that "Paradise is under the shades of swords."

Fallaci decapitata is a fitting emblem for the new Europe, in which the Swedish government closed down a political party's website for displaying the cartoons of Muhammad, the Norwegian editor who ran the cartoons abjectly apologized, and European companies doing business in the Middle East can't dissociate themselves quickly enough from Denmark. This is the New Dhimmi Europe, eager to "give the Muslim world the message: We are aware of the consequences of exercising the right of free expression."

Europe is already well aware of those consequences. They are clear in Veneziano’s painting. Not enough of those in Europe who still have their heads seem willing to stand up to Islamic violence and intimidation long enough to allow the heroic lady to keep hers. All around the Continent the parliamentary heads of government are losing their heads trying to avoid offending Islam; all too soon they will realize that Fallaci's head alone was not enough to appease their sworn enemies. Not nearly enough.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: fallaci; jihad; left

1 posted on 02/14/2006 10:40:54 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem
And who would the Jihadists kill first if they take over? Why the very same idiot leftists who seem to blind to the consequences of their actions.
2 posted on 02/14/2006 10:47:50 PM PST by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kozak

I know this must be a Cliche but isnt Islam the Religion of Peace? Just a question.


3 posted on 02/14/2006 10:52:38 PM PST by lndrvr1972 (N)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Anybody who hates America and Israel more than they hate Islamofascists are influenced by Satan. Simple as that.


4 posted on 02/14/2006 11:20:10 PM PST by Falcon28
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Anybody who hates America and Israel more than they hate Islamofascists are influenced by Satan. Simple as that.


5 posted on 02/14/2006 11:20:11 PM PST by Falcon28
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

the muslims are like cockroaches, once they spread, stopping them is difficult


6 posted on 02/14/2006 11:21:04 PM PST by MetalHeadConservative35 (Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes. (i fear the greeks even when they bring gifts))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Falcon28
Anybody who hates America and Israel more than they hate Islamofascists are influenced by Satan. Simple as that.

Nah, no need to anthropomorphize this. It's the totalitarian impulse, pure & simple. Some people just gravitate towards a framework based on dominance & submission. For a century in the West, it was expressed in secular Marxism. Now that Marxism has died of exhaustion, many leftists feel a strange, inexplicable pull towards the one remaining moral system left that's based on dominance & submission.

IMO the lesson is that for leftists, it's not the secularism that they're fundamentally drawn to. It's the slavery.

7 posted on 02/14/2006 11:57:11 PM PST by jennyp (WHAT I'M READING NOW: Life and Solitude in Easter Island by Verdugo-Binimelis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The Mooselimbs have taken the infidel's tolerance for granted.

In their eyes, the Koran is above the Constitution. All Islamic troubles spew from this fact.


8 posted on 02/15/2006 12:03:08 AM PST by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
It's the totalitarian impulse, pure & simple.

Terrifying but true. There are those who, while they grew up in free societies, hate freedom. Some fear self-responsibility and long to just "follow orders" in a totalitarian regime. Others crave power and want to be commisars and executioners.

Islamofascism is the only growing totalitarian movement, so people displaced as it were by the fall of communism see a new hope for destruction in jihad. These spoiled Westerners are nihilists who will follow anyone who promises death and destruction. These nihilists are anti-humans who crave destruction for its own sake.

9 posted on 02/15/2006 12:39:50 AM PST by Wilhelm Tell (True or False? This is not a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

BTTT


10 posted on 02/15/2006 1:57:54 AM PST by Dajjal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dajjal

I wonder what the mohammeden "street's" reaction was to the ignominious crushing of the formerly invincible holy warriors of the taliban?

Any insights?


11 posted on 02/15/2006 2:15:19 AM PST by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
I wonder what the mohammeden "street's" reaction was to the ignominious crushing of the formerly invincible holy warriors of the taliban?

Waqf's rxn => "WTF?"

12 posted on 02/15/2006 2:29:09 AM PST by yianni ("there was the tyranny of the lawyers and their charges."-Belloc,1936)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

good article


13 posted on 02/15/2006 2:44:27 AM PST by King Prout (many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I can't believe this artist, what an enabler....

Fallaci is ill, and to do this when she is very sick is shameless.

And to use decapitation as a vehicle in his art, the same method used by these terrorist has me speechless, how twisted is this man?

Let me get this straight, we have a media and country obsessed with a hunting incident, while certain members of a given faith have no self control and lack of rule of law has them attacking many things including embassy's which is an act of war, and the UN is taking it's sweat time an behaving as if it is not an issue about these same types potentially getting the "Bomb"?

Beam me up Scotty.....

14 posted on 02/15/2006 3:18:54 AM PST by taildragger (They call themselves Liberal Democrats, I call them Collaborators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kozak; Falcon28; jennyp; Wilhelm Tell
And who would the Jihadists kill first if they take over? Why the very same idiot leftists who seem to blind to the consequences of their actions.

I used to ask the same question but I soon concluded that the left would have no compunction to do as they insists we not do - kill or enslave them all even if it meant nukes.

The left and the Islamists have been in cahoots for a long time. As the author says, they have a lot in common. However, the most important thing they have in common is not totalitarianism, that is a fundamental part of their system, but their desire to destroy the USA. That is the goal they are working together to accomplish. It is a "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" relationship.

Under Communism, Nazism, Fascism, or any other tight control, top down system, you are either the in crowd or you are a slave. Under Islam you are either predator or prey.

15 posted on 02/15/2006 8:34:20 AM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
I wonder what the mohammeden "street's" reaction was to the ignominious crushing of the formerly invincible holy warriors of the taliban?
Any insights?

I do not claim to have any knowledge of the "Muslim street."

The only thing I can say is that, according to the Muslim End-Time prophecies, the Dajjal is extremely powerful militarily, and has wide influence over the globe, except for the most faithful of Muslims. When the Mahdi goes up against him, the Mahdi's army is extremely small by comparison. And the Mahdi does not have an easy time of it. He will lose two-thirds of his original army before the serious fighting begins. And he has many setbacks and losses as his jihad with the Dajjal goes forward.

So any Muslim who believes that we are in the End Times will find any particular Muslim losses easy to assimilate into his belief system.

16 posted on 02/15/2006 10:09:27 PM PST by Dajjal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverdem


Both the Left and the mujahedin envision a totalitarian state that cleanses the world of evil by force, establishing a just society at the price of an unspecified number of dead. Both advocate a supremacist ideology unable to tolerate criticism from others.

Profound and true.

Some describe Muslim extremists as the religious right. A preference for totalitarian rule is a leftist preference. So I consider Muslim extremists to be an example of the religious left. Look to America’s founding fathers to see those who were both religious and wanted to limit government power. They were raised to believe that one should give unto Caesar only that which was Caesar’s.

17 posted on 03/18/2006 9:30:57 AM PST by ChessExpert (MSM: Only good for to taking side(s))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson