Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Secret Saddam WMD Tapes Subject of ABC Nightline Special (Live Thread for Tonight)
CNSNews ^ | February 15 2006 | Sherrie Gossett

Posted on 02/15/2006 6:27:47 AM PST by jmc1969

Secret audiotapes of Saddam Hussein discussing ways to attack America with weapons of mass destruction will be the subject of an ABC "Nightline" program Wednesday night, a former federal prosecutor told Cybercast News Service.

The tapes are being called the "smoking gun" of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq. The New York Sun reported that the tapes have been authenticated and currently are being reviewed by the U.S. House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.

The panel's chairman, Rep. Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich.), declined to give the Sun details of the content or context of the recordings, saying only that they were provided to his committee by former federal prosecutor John Loftus.

Loftus has been tight-lipped about the tapes, telling the Sun only that he received them from a "former American military intelligence analyst."

On Tuesday night, Loftus told Cybercast News Service that ABC's "Nightline" would air an "extensive report" on the tapes Wednesday night. Loftus also described an ABC News "teaser," which reportedly contains audio of Saddam Hussein discussing ways to attack America with WMD. "Nightline will have a lot more," said Loftus.

This year's Intelligence Summit will bring together top terrorism experts including Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld, author of "Funding Evil," 9/11 investigator Jean-Charles Brisard, author of "Zarqawi: the New Face of Al-Qaeda;" former CIA agent Michael Scheurer, author of "Imperial Hubris," and Richard Marcinko, former head of SEAL Team Six, and author of "Rogue Warrior."

The Intelligence Summit will be featured not only in the Wednesday Nightline report but also on ABC World News Tonight.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: abcnews; iraq; saddam; saddamtapes; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201 next last

1 posted on 02/15/2006 6:27:49 AM PST by jmc1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

Can't wait for that 60 Minutes show with Dan Rather to debunk the audiotapes based on typewritten evidence faxed to him from a Texas Kinko's.


2 posted on 02/15/2006 6:30:34 AM PST by peyton randolph (As long is it does me no harm, I don't care if one worships Elmer Fudd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

Uh oh...MSM and DUmmie suicide alert


3 posted on 02/15/2006 6:30:43 AM PST by fizziwig (Democrats: so far off the path, so incredibly vicious, so sadly pathetic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

Watch for strategic editing and strategic commentary.


4 posted on 02/15/2006 6:31:10 AM PST by OldFriend (The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

Intresting to see how ABC handels this. My guess is they will spin as hard as they can to dismiss the tapes as phoney.


5 posted on 02/15/2006 6:31:59 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Conservatives...lack sufficient cynicism to properly assess the nature of their liberal opponents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

They have to be phony tapes. There were no WMD, Saddam had no WMD so therefor the tapes have to be phonies. (/S/)


6 posted on 02/15/2006 6:32:01 AM PST by SR 50 (Larry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fizziwig
They'll just claim it is a fake, even if it's Saddam's own voice..

Considering the DUmbasses reaction to the Cheney shooting incident, they'll probably find proof it is fake in some video game or role playing guide.
7 posted on 02/15/2006 6:32:09 AM PST by mnehring (Perry 06- It's better than a hippie in a cowboy hat or a commie with blue hair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

oh geez! not another "smoking gun of WMDs" article!


8 posted on 02/15/2006 6:33:24 AM PST by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

I'm trying to think of how the libs will try to spin out of this besides just ignoring it.


9 posted on 02/15/2006 6:34:06 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

I would expect that since it is ABC, we can expect this to be a limited exposure to any revelations, and then they will do whatever they can to instill doubt about whatever they reveal on the air.

ABC is no friend to our country, and Loftus should be considered negligent or worse to give them the scoop


10 posted on 02/15/2006 6:34:24 AM PST by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969
""[T]here were no weapons," Sen. Hillary Clinton, (D-N.Y.) recently commented, "or if there were, they certainly weren't used or they were in some way disposed of or taken out of the country."

Which is EXACTLY what we've been saying all along.

But you don't see the LSM with a headline saying "Hillary says Iraq's WMD taken out the country."

And you never will.
11 posted on 02/15/2006 6:35:38 AM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Based on their morning radio news breaks, ABC is spinning this as follows: The tapes are authentic. They show that Saddam was not a threat to the US.

Of course, this is total BS.


12 posted on 02/15/2006 6:36:03 AM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: zook

How so?


13 posted on 02/15/2006 6:38:01 AM PST by jmc1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68

"I would expect that since it is ABC, we can expect this to be a limited exposure to any revelations, and then they will do whatever they can to instill doubt about whatever they reveal on the air."

Yuo sure said that well.


14 posted on 02/15/2006 6:39:37 AM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

Out local radio station has been carrying this for two days now. At first it was "the smoking gun! proof that Saddam was deliberately hiding things from the UN"

By the second segment, it was "well, if this is all true, why didn't it come from the White House? Why did it come from another source?" (trying to piggy back on the Cheney-media communication issue)

This morning the spin doctors had taken over: these tapes show Saddam lying to the weapons inspectors, but only to protect Iraq from those big meanies in Iran. He didn't have WMD, but made the illusion that he did because it was easier to hint that he did to fool the west than just try to dupe Iran (those Iranians are just too smart). Then after 9/11 he couldn't convince the US of the truth. Actual quote: "he got caught in his own lie". So bottom line, it's still Bush's fault!


15 posted on 02/15/2006 6:40:06 AM PST by Hoodlum91 (pcottraux says I'm special!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

Their news report ended with the statement: "But Saddam said that Iraq would not be responsible for any attack."

Now you know and I know he meant that Iraq would somehow cover its involvement. But ABC appeared to be using the line to once again suggest that Iraq posed no direct threat to America.


16 posted on 02/15/2006 6:40:48 AM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
You mean another seeBS unnamed source of 'unimpeachable' credentials?
17 posted on 02/15/2006 6:41:23 AM PST by AZRepublican ("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

ABC: The tapes are accurate, but fake.


18 posted on 02/15/2006 6:42:24 AM PST by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc1969

Smoking gun you Democratic bitches!


19 posted on 02/15/2006 6:45:11 AM PST by steel_resolve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican

Y"ou mean another seeBS unnamed source of 'unimpeachable' credentials?"

Mary Mapes, reporting for duty.


20 posted on 02/15/2006 6:46:54 AM PST by wmileo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson