Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam on Tape: Terrorists Will Attack D.C.
Newsmax.com ^ | Wednesday, Feb. 15, 2006 10:53 a.m. EST | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 02/15/2006 8:21:56 AM PST by edpc

Five years before Osama bin Laden attacked the World Trade Center and Pentagon, Saddam Hussein predicted that Washington, D.C. would be struck by terrorists, according to audiotapes set for broadcast tonight on ABC's "Nightline."

In an ABC Radio report to promote the show, the network's lead investigative reporter, Brian Ross, revealed that the FBI translator who leaked the tapes said they contained "damning evidence that the world should know."

In one 10-year-old recording, the Iraqi dictator is said to boast that Washington would be an easy target for a nuclear or biological weapons attack. Saddam added, however, that if such an attack should come, his regime would not be directly responsible.

In fact, Saddam's 1996 warning of a terrorist attack on Washington was followed up in Iraq's state run press with even more prescient predictions.

On July 21, 2001, less than two months before 9/11, the state-controlled Iraqi newspaper Al-Nasiriya carried a column headlined "America, An Obsession Called Osama Bin Ladin." In the piece, Baath Party writer Naeem Abd Muhalhal predicted that bin Laden would attack the U.S. "with the seriousness of the Bedouin of the desert about the way he will try to bomb the Pentagon after he destroys the White House."

In 1992, Saddam's son Uday used an editorial in Babil, the newspaper he ran, to warn of Iraqi kamikaze attacks inside America, saying, "Does the United States realize the meaning of every Iraqi becoming a missile that can cross countries and cities?" In the late 1990s, according to UPI, "a cable to Saddam from the chief of Iraqi intelligence was transmitted by Baghdad Radio. The message read, 'We will chase [Americans] to every corner at all times. No high tower of steel will protect them against the fire of truth.'"

After the 9/11 attacks, Saddam became the only world leader to offer praise for bin Laden, even as other terrorist leaders such as Yasser Arafat went out of their way to make a show of sympathy to the U.S. by donating blood for 9/11 victims.

The day after the attacks, in quotes picked up by Agence France-Press, Saddam proclaimed that "America is reaping the thorns planted by its rulers in the world."

"There is hardly a place [in the world] that does not have a memorial symbolizing the criminal actions committed by America against its natives," AFP quoted the Iraqi dictator complaining, based on reports in the Iraqi News agency.

For his part, Uday flat-out praised the 9/11 attacks, saying, "These were courageous operations carried out by young Arabs and Muslims," according to quotes picked up by the Saudi daily Asharq al-Awsat. "Nightline's" broadcast tonight will be based on 12 hours of tapes obtained by ABC News. But that's likely only the tip of the iceberg.

In his April 2005 final report on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, chief U.S. weapons inspector Charles Duelfer said he had uncovered "a large collection" of recordings of Saddam chairing his Revolutionary Command Council


TOPICS: US: District of Columbia; US: Maryland; US: Virginia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iraq; jihadinamerica; saddam; saddamtapes; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: edpc

This is just one more instance of information being held by the US that would justify the Administration's concerns about Iraq.

Can anyone explain why these tapes and all the translated documents are being withheld under security classifications?


21 posted on 02/15/2006 8:57:29 AM PST by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

"Saddam added, however, that if such an attack should come, his regime would not be directly responsible. "

The media will misrepresent this as "Iraq posed no direct threat to America."


22 posted on 02/15/2006 9:00:02 AM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2
People will read Saddam's statement differently. His denial of "direct" responsibility is confirmation of his "indirect" involvement.

9-11, As always, Usama had the "delivery methods" and "structural" info down pat. Saddam is a "maker" of WMD. Together they are probably the most dangerous people in the world. Going into Iraq was the right thing to do.

I still believe that Saddam was the "maker" of the anthrax...either directly or indirectly.

23 posted on 02/15/2006 9:00:16 AM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj

That mural...Was it the same as the calendars?


24 posted on 02/15/2006 9:01:14 AM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wildbill
Can anyone explain why these tapes and all the translated documents are being withheld under security classifications?

It's a pure guess on my part, but I suppose there is a lot of detailed information about sources and networks that may need to be investigated further. If you open them to full public scrutiny, it may jeopardize ongoing operations, as the NYT exposure of NSA survelliance may have.

25 posted on 02/15/2006 9:02:56 AM PST by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
I still believe that Saddam was the "maker" of the anthrax...either directly or indirectly.

You and me both. I also think some of Saddam's high-level intelligence agents provided, at a minimum, logistical support to the 9/11 terrorists, and perhaps even direct training.

The original Gulf War in '91 never really ended in Saddam's mind, and he was actively seeking revenge against us for driving him out of Kuwait for all those years afterwards.

26 posted on 02/15/2006 9:04:07 AM PST by jpl ("We don't negotiate with terrorists, we put them out of business." - Scott McClellan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj
It will be spun to try and damage the President. "See! He should have know."

There will be no mention of the link between Saddam and Osama.

If I'm wrong, I will be ecstatic. But I'm not going to get my hopes up.
27 posted on 02/15/2006 9:05:10 AM PST by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2

"Saddam added, however, that if such an attack should come, his regime COULD NOT BE SEEN as directly responsible."


There, fixed it.


28 posted on 02/15/2006 9:06:25 AM PST by headstamp (Nothing lasts forever, Unless it does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: headstamp

Thanks.

I knew it was missing something!


29 posted on 02/15/2006 9:08:46 AM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

No. It was a painting on a large wall of planes flying into the towers with a picture of Sadsam smoking a cigar and gloating.


30 posted on 02/15/2006 9:10:44 AM PST by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: edpc

ping


31 posted on 02/15/2006 9:15:48 AM PST by N2Gems
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Here's a link with picture

http://www.nationalreview.com/images/mural3.jpg


32 posted on 02/15/2006 9:21:05 AM PST by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: edpc

BTTT!


33 posted on 02/15/2006 9:26:07 AM PST by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter

Thank you so much for all your hard work! I believe folks will be using your well documented list in the very near future. BTTT


34 posted on 02/15/2006 9:27:21 AM PST by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: edpc

In other words...

The spin will be that the Bush administration should have known what was coming.


35 posted on 02/15/2006 9:28:30 AM PST by VaBthang4 ("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj
when the mural our soldiers found in Iraq was painted.

The first place I saw that painting was on a wall in one of Saddam's palaces when they went into Bagdad and took over the palace for a headquarters.

It was there when the Army was showing the insides of the palace. It also showed the bathrooms with solid gold fixtures.

The video did not make any special effort to show the painting. It was visible when they were walking through the palace.

36 posted on 02/15/2006 9:39:15 AM PST by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: edpc

The documents and tapes I'm talking about were among those swept up in the various ministries of Iraq after the invasion.

There's nothing secret about those opearations or methods, it was called shock and awe. Some investigative reporter has been trying to get them declassified for years.


37 posted on 02/15/2006 9:40:18 AM PST by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: edpc
"Bush lied! He made up the evidence about ... er, whatwasthatyousaid? ... Saddam? he did!?! really? it was authenticated? the hell you say! ... nevermind."
38 posted on 02/15/2006 9:43:58 AM PST by NonValueAdded ("If I were a Cuban, I'd certainly be on a raft," Isane Aparicio Busto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj
I'm still waiting for an explanation as to when the mural our soldiers found in Iraq was painted.

I am more concerned with the why than the when in this instance. The detail, specifically where the buildings were hit, seems to point to a post-attack artist rendering. However, if Saddam had noting to do with it, why would he sanction a painting (everyone knows nothing like this happened in Iraq without his knowledge and consent) showing him associated with the 9/11 attack? I'd also be interested in knowing the translation of the Arabic writing under his image.


39 posted on 02/15/2006 9:54:16 AM PST by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: edpc

Uday is "DU" in pig Latin.


40 posted on 02/15/2006 9:56:26 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson