Skip to comments.
Cheney as Toast:
Democrats Burning
Down the House
The WAll Street Journal ^
| February 17, 2006
| DANIEL HENNINGER
Posted on 02/17/2006 7:39:20 AM PST by presidio9
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: MurryMom
LOL, yes Saddam was innocent, and old Cheney and Harry were drunk, and dueling for fun!
To: MurryMom
I can think of only one rational answer to Cheney's question: something else happened and the current story is a cover-up.You're right.
Harry Whittington actually died and the delay is so that Karl Rove can get the Whittington double's plastic surgery completed and the Whittington family's cover story planted.
42
posted on
02/17/2006 10:35:49 AM PST
by
HIDEK6
To: MurryMom
"I can think of only one rational answer to Cheney's question: something else happened and the current story is a cover-up."
Does this mean you will no longer support the Republicans?
SAY IT AIN'T SO!!!!!
43
posted on
02/17/2006 10:37:32 AM PST
by
Sam's Army
(Another unsuccessful attempt to refrain from posting)
To: Sisku Hanne
Seriously, why do they keep you around here?
For the laughs. Just read some of the inanity that is posted by this high school drop out. Hilarious!!
44
posted on
02/17/2006 10:38:29 AM PST
by
Safetgiver
(Noone spoke when the levee done broke, Blanco cried and Nagin lied.)
To: presidio9
45
posted on
02/17/2006 10:39:07 AM PST
by
hattend
(Facts destroy Liberalism. It's an undeniable fact of life. - Rush Limbaugh)
To: HIDEK6
Harry was going to go public and spill everything about the Bilderbergers, the Trilateral Commission and the whole lot of 'em.
46
posted on
02/17/2006 10:43:33 AM PST
by
colorado tanker
(We need more "chicken-bleep Democrats" in the Senate!)
To: Tax Government
What if, right after FR surfaced as a force in the Clinton impeachment period, a bunch of people signed up as democrat sympathizers and stayed mostly under cover until...about now?I've always suspected the same thing.
Also, many left-wing techies use multiple computers and/or sign on names.
And like alqaida, they will hide amongst the normal population a long time in order to use their subterfuge to further their cause.
47
posted on
02/17/2006 10:44:48 AM PST
by
Edit35
To: dc-zoo
"Cheney is not the problem. The radical left-wing media is. There will be a backlash over these Cheney attacks if they keep it up and they will."
This is the Media and DNC's SOP to damage good conservatives. They make huge controversies and outrageous tinfoil stories about them to the point where people start believing them (see Goebbels), then they label these strong and eloquent conservatives as lightening rods and damaged goods and call for their ouster. It happened with Gingrich, DeLay, Prior, and on and on.
48
posted on
02/17/2006 10:48:03 AM PST
by
Hayzo
To: colorado tanker
49
posted on
02/17/2006 10:59:38 AM PST
by
HIDEK6
To: MurryMom
You are completely correct!!!!!
Cheny flushed an Illegal Immigrant out of the grass and poor ol' Harry stood up at the wrong time! By the way, go back to DU, they have the kind of "information" you're looking for over there.
50
posted on
02/17/2006 11:07:12 AM PST
by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(M.S.M. CREED: "Truth has no substance until we give it permission!")
To: Finny
Simply cite here examples of Cheney's "outright falsehoods about national security threats."
All of Cheney's references to a "mushroom shaped cloud" suggesting that Saddam had nuclear WMD, for which suggestion there never was any factual basis. When the U.S. armies invaded Iraq the Iraqi nuclear weapons program was still under U.N. seal, just as the inspectors left it when Bush's invasion forced the U.N. to leave.
51
posted on
02/17/2006 11:07:45 AM PST
by
MurryMom
To: MurryMom
Why on Earth haven't you been removed yet, like other traitors?
52
posted on
02/17/2006 11:11:06 AM PST
by
furquhart
(God is not dead)
To: dc-zoo
The left are having delusional visions of the Nixon Era. Nixon replaced his VP with Ford. So with the lefts delusional thinking...they're pushing for Cheney to step down...'cause again their delusional thinking...after 2006 election they'll have the ability to impeach Bush. They in NO way want to impeach Bush with Cheney still the VP. So this is their delusional misguided strategy.
53
posted on
02/17/2006 11:26:11 AM PST
by
shield
(The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instructions.Pr 1:7)
To: MurryMom
I can think of only one rational answer to Cheney's question: something else happened and the current story is a cover-up.Here's what I think:
-- Elvis is dead.
-- Oswald acted alone.
-- There are no aliens at Roswell.
-- It was a hunting accident.
Lando
54
posted on
02/17/2006 11:39:09 AM PST
by
Lando Lincoln
(God bless Jared Linskens and his family.)
To: MurryMom
I cannot understand why your lying RAT troll presence is tolerated here, except maybe for illustration of the stupidity of liberals.
To: MurryMom
All of Cheney's references to a "mushroom shaped cloud" suggesting that Saddam had nuclear WMD, for which suggestion there never was any factual basis. When the U.S. armies invaded Iraq the Iraqi nuclear weapons program was still under U.N. seal, just as the inspectors left it when Bush's invasion forced the U.N. to leave. I am impressed that you actually responded as requested, instead of prevaricating, although I see only ONE so-called "falsehood" in your reply, not in the plural, as you stated originally. Nor do I buy what you list above as an "outright falsehood." I don't need Cheney or anyone else to tell me that Saddam would get and use nuclear weapons if he could, and I am not naive enough to think he wasn't trying. He did use chemical weapons against his own people. The U.N. has zero credibilty with me and probably millions of Americans.
You want an example of "outright falsehoods," plural?
"Republicans have cut the budget of (name of sacred cow social program) ..." when in fact Republicans have cut the rate of growth in funding for said program.
"I did not have sex with that woman .... Ever."
"My husband is the victim of a vast right-wing conspiracy."
Republians want to starve old people and poison our children.
I'm sure other FReepers can add to a list of examples of genuine "outright falsehoods" coming from politicians.
56
posted on
02/17/2006 2:24:36 PM PST
by
Finny
(God continue to Bless President G.W. Bush with wisdom, popularity, safety and success.)
To: MurryMom
Why the vice president of the U.S. should suddenly worry about not being believed is beyond me, especially given his routine and very bold use of distorted information and outright falsehoods about national security threats.
You don't have to play stupid, we already know you are.....
57
posted on
02/17/2006 2:25:49 PM PST
by
MikefromOhio
(Brokeback Mountain: The ONLY western where the Cowboys GET IT IN THE END!!!)
To: Finny
Why waste our time. Never argue with an idiot, someone who does not know might be listening and you will look bad.
58
posted on
02/17/2006 2:30:50 PM PST
by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: MurryMom
The weirdest comment Cheney made on his Fox lovefest, was when he asked: "Are they going to take my word for what happened?" Please, please write to your local papers and politicians to find out what really happened! This can be put in the que with finding the real killers of Nicole.
Actually, I heard the VP and Mr. Whittington were possibly huffing gasoline before the hunt. You might want to look in to it.
59
posted on
02/17/2006 2:40:42 PM PST
by
101st-Eagle
(Dogmatists: http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/12/28/healthscience/sneinstein.php)
To: JackDanielsOldNo7; MurryMom
What damn business is it of anyones on what happenend on a private outing amongst friends? Why do you liberals have to have your noses up everyones asses? Get a job life or whatever it is you losers do It's usually not a job.
60
posted on
02/17/2006 2:44:31 PM PST
by
101st-Eagle
(Dogmatists: http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/12/28/healthscience/sneinstein.php)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson