Posted on 02/17/2006 10:59:39 AM PST by Aquinasfan
In a remarkably even-handed article, Margaret Bunting points Guardian readers to the emerging debate on human enhancement, and the forthcoming pamphlet on Better Humans" from the British thinktank Demos.
To the real enthusiasts - they call themselves transhumanists - humanity is on the point of being liberated from its biology. In their advocacy of our technological rights, they believe that human beings are on the brink of a huge leap in development, leaving behind the sick, quarrelsome, weak, fallible creatures we have been up to now. We will be, as their slogan goes, better than well.More...This is the prospect that horrifies the so-called bio-conservatives such as Francis Fukuyama, who argues that transhumanism is the most dangerous ideology of our time. There are plenty who share his concerns, pointing out that the implications for human rights, indeed for our understanding of what it is to be human, are huge. What place will equality have in this brave new world? What place will privacy have when brain imaging can read our thoughts and transcranial magnetic stimulation can manipulate our thoughts? What powers over our brains will the state demand in the war against terror?...
Theres no stop button available. Much of the research that could be ultimately used for human enhancement is urgently needed to counter such neuro-degenerative diseases as Alzheimers. But its all too possible to envisage how fast, in a competitive, unequal world, we could hurtle towards some horrible futures. The one I outlined above for my descendants was the most benign I could imagine. Theres no point in sci-fi style panic. The best hope lies in the strength and quality of public debate and democratic institutions to regulate and direct the use of these powerful technologies.
Millions of souls have been slaughtered through the centuries because of notions of genetic superiority. Wonder what's gonna happen when some actually ARE superior because of genetic engineering?
The race is on to identify the political genes...
The winner will purge the losers from the gene pool...
Imagine a nation of Hillary Clinton clones...
Same as always. Slavery and murder.
Really? And the peer-reviewed science behind your assertion can be found where?
I wouldn't be so sure.
We live in an age when thousands of people have themselves injected with botulism toxin to look a bit better. What's gonna happen when you can engineer your kids (or yourself, for that matter), to have a distinct advantage in life that non-engineered people will not have?
Except it could well go well beyond that to extermination of non-engineered humans at some point. And a genetics arms race within the remainder.
"What's gonna happen when you can engineer your kids (or yourself, for that matter), to have a distinct advantage in life that non-engineered people will not have?
"
I don't know, to tell you the truth. So far, we can't do that, and I'll be dead by the time we can.
For now, folks will have to try to marry those with whom they can make good babies. I'm not sure how well that is working these days.
I'm living proof it ain't :^)
I disagree, but we'll likely have a pretty good idea who's right in 20 years or so.
It's because you can't prove your leads and your intuition about Darwinism that it gives them the right to force you to adopt their policies.
It's the usual unethical blasphemer under the guise of science and social experimentation expediency. You are their guinea pig by force because right now they claim to have the best theory.
>These wierd folks are just nutcases. They dream of a day when they "shed their human bodies," and are pure intellect.
The meek shall inherit the Earth (The rest of us will go to the stars!)
DISCUSSION ABOUT:
"There is no 'Stop Button' in the race for human engineering"
Now it's called "human engineering" but it's still research upon human embryonic cells and advances in the area of human cloning -- however theoretically, still actually given that the real human material that represents human life is being used as research and exploration processes -- but it's as unbridled now as ever before.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To be included in or removed from the MORAL ABSOLUTES PINGLIST, please FreepMail either MillerCreek or wagglebee.
Life extension & transhumanism (which seems to be <ahem> life-extension on steroids) are both orthogonal to evolution. Why would you think there was any relation between the two? Are you saying that a creationist shouldn't want to extend their lives or try to ensure that they'll still mentally alert when they reach 100? How strange.
But those kinds of questions pop up with any technological advance. "Who gets the advance & who doesn't?" "How do 'we' decide?"
In general the best answer has always been to let the free market decide. Then people's actual values get to come into play in an organic way to achieve the (presumably) most ideal result that the real world can produce.
In an authoritarian, fascist, overregulated society a new technology such as this could easily turn into a horror. But in the free world? The best (or at least the most benign) scenarios are most likely.
That's why I'm basically an optimist WRT these new technologies. Because I'm basically an optimist WRT the future of freedom generally.
There are some levels of technology it really isn't best to let the market decide on. Advanced weapons systems would be high on the list, and genetic tinkering should be on the list too.
It's sounds so Sci-Fi. How chilling.
The genies will have an edge over baseline humans. Everyone that can afford it will probably do it.
If you want a really clear look at how dark it gets, find a place to rent the entire Ghost in the Shell series--the original movie, the TV series, and expecially the second movie Ghost in the Shell: Innocence.
As everyone on FR knows, I'm convinced the Mark of the Beast will contain a neural interface--if it doesn't make repentence impossible, it doesn't fit the bill.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.