Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Firm sues to block foreign port takeover
AP/seattlepi ^ | February 18, 2006 | TED BRIDIS

Posted on 02/18/2006 6:55:19 PM PST by ncountylee

WASHINGTON -- A company at the Port of Miami has sued to block the takeover of shipping operations there by a state-owned business in the United Arab Emirates. It is the first American courtroom effort to capsize a $6.8 billion sale already embroiled in a national debate over security risks at six major U.S. ports affected by the deal.

The Miami company, a subsidiary of Eller & Company Inc., presently is a business partner with London-based Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co., which Dubai Ports World purchased last week. In a lawsuit in Florida circuit court, the Miami subsidiary said that under the sale it will become an "involuntary partner" with Dubai's government and it may seek more than $10 million in damages.

The Miami subsidiary, Continental Stevedoring & Terminals Inc., said the sale to Dubai was prohibited under its partnership agreement with the British firm and "may endanger the national security of the United States." It asked a judge to block the takeover and said it does not believe the company, Florida or the U.S. government can ensure Dubai Ports World's compliance with American security rules.

(Excerpt) Read more at seattlepi.nwsource.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Florida; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: lawsuit; miami; ports; uae
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

1 posted on 02/18/2006 6:55:20 PM PST by ncountylee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

Let's hope the lawyers will clean up Bush's mess.


2 posted on 02/18/2006 6:58:57 PM PST by Founding Father (The War Against Western Civilization Has Begun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
With the exception of a couple FReepers who believe the President is infallible, everyone seems to be against this. It's sheer idiocy to give a Muslim country the authority to manage U.S. Ports.
3 posted on 02/18/2006 7:00:13 PM PST by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

The port contract was already foreign-run, so the headline is false on its face. And this suit is against the British company and is purely a matter of contract law.


4 posted on 02/18/2006 7:02:06 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BW2221

Amem and Amen


5 posted on 02/18/2006 7:02:46 PM PST by rose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

I hope this move stops this takeover. In all these years I have never felt as I feel about this Dubai deal... we are practically handing ourselves over to serious damage, damage that could cripple our country unlike anything before. I pray to God this is stopped.


6 posted on 02/18/2006 7:04:00 PM PST by Cinnamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

"...a $6.8 billion sale.."

The selling of America.


7 posted on 02/18/2006 7:04:27 PM PST by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

As much as I don't like to see this stuff played out in a courtroom, I'm real glad that somebody's suing this time.


8 posted on 02/18/2006 7:04:30 PM PST by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BW2221
True and this is a direct correlation of ownership. The Panama Canal is indirectly owned by the Red Chineese Army (if reported intel is correct).
9 posted on 02/18/2006 7:04:31 PM PST by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
"The port contract was already foreign-run, so the headline is false on its face. And this suit is against the British company and is purely a matter of contract law."

what? Why would the suit be against the British firm, didn't the story claim that Dubai purchased it? Or did I misunderstand it?

10 posted on 02/18/2006 7:08:22 PM PST by TheCrusader ("The frenzy of the mohammedans has devastated the Churches of God" Pope Urban II ~ 1097A.D.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BW2221

This issue hinges on the question of whether we are at war with terrorists or Islam.


11 posted on 02/18/2006 7:10:01 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BW2221
With the exception of a couple FReepers who believe the President is infallible, everyone seems to be against this. It's sheer idiocy to give a Muslim country the authority to manage U.S. Ports.

I've been thinking about this, and it would seem the we ought to be able to play this game, too. UAE can run some ports for 6.8 billion if we can manage their oil facilities and ports and the Strait of Hormuz for the same price. If they scream "sovereignty", we say: "See?".

12 posted on 02/18/2006 7:11:53 PM PST by Migraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TheCrusader
The firm was a partner of the British firm that currently operates the ports. The story is very skimpy on the facts, but it has to be a suit against the British firm for selling out to the Dubai firm in violation of their contract with the British firm.

Whether the sale violated that contract I don't know, but this is clearly a contract case and nothing more.

13 posted on 02/18/2006 7:19:09 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

I comfort myself by pretending the UAE is a front for the CIA and various secret societies who protect the world from itself.

Then, my alarm clock rings, and I get up out of bed.


14 posted on 02/18/2006 7:24:32 PM PST by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Contract broken? Give the contract to an American firm then.


15 posted on 02/18/2006 7:24:51 PM PST by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Migraine
If they scream "sovereignty", we say: "See?".

Try to open a Church.

16 posted on 02/18/2006 7:28:52 PM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cedar

That's not how it works.

And interestingly, you don't see an American firm even trying to get the job.


17 posted on 02/18/2006 7:29:07 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cedar

The UAE is very pro-American. Only two of the 19 9-11 hijackers were from there.


18 posted on 02/18/2006 7:29:08 PM PST by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

Even if there wasn't a single islamderthal working in these ports, I can't imagine how much money is going back home and into the hands of terrorists.

You would think that we would learn to stop financing the wars against us.


19 posted on 02/18/2006 7:30:14 PM PST by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Founding Father

The Arabs are not our friends.


20 posted on 02/18/2006 7:34:03 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson