Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYC street to be renamed in Peter Jennings' honor (Spot where Nathan Hale hung renamed for Canuck Pa
ABC13.com ^ | 2/21/06

Posted on 02/21/2006 1:09:43 PM PST by presidio9

The City of New York will pay tribute to Peter Jennings today when the street where ABC News headquarters is located is renamed in his honor.

It is a permanent geographical memorial to the man who left such an indelible mark on the landscape of American journalism.

West 66th Street between Central Park West and Columbus Avenue in New York City's Upper West Side will be dubbed "Peter Jennings Way." The Jennings family, ABC News President David Westin, New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg and many of Jennings' former colleagues will attend the naming ceremony.

Jennings lived close to his office and he loved his neighborhood. He died last August at age 67 from lung cancer, four months after publicly disclosing his illness.

Jennings first joined ABC News in 1964, anchoring "Peter Jennings with the News" from 1965 to 1967. He was named anchor and senior editor of "World News Tonight" in 1983 and was honored with almost every major award given to television journalists in his 22 years in the anchor chair. Jennings won 16 Emmys, two George Foster Peabody Awards, several Alfred I. duPont-Columbia University Awards, several Overseas Press Club Awards and two consecutive Edward R. Murrow Awards.

A Distinguished Career and Legacy As one of America's most distinguished journalists, Jennings reported many pivotal, world-shaping events. He was also an author, writing "The Century" with Todd Brewster. The book, which was on The New York Times' best-seller list, is structured as an epic tale about "ourselves," featuring astonishing first-person accounts of the great events of the century.

He also established the first American television news bureau in the Arab world in 1968 when he served as ABC News' bureau chief in Beirut, Lebanon, a position he held for seven years.

Jennings helped put ABC News on the map in 1972 with his coverage of the Summer Olympics in Munich, Germany, when Arab terrorists took Israeli athletes hostage.

His extensive domestic and overseas reporting experience was evident in "World News Tonight's" coverage of major crises. He reported from all 50 states and locations around the globe. During the 1991 Gulf War and the 2003 War in Iraq, his knowledge of Middle Eastern affairs brought invaluable perspective to ABC News' coverage of the war in Iraq and the drug trade in Central and South America.

The series also tackled important domestic issues such as gun control policy, the politics of abortion, the crisis in funding for the arts and a highly praised chronicle of the accused bombers of Oklahoma City. "Peter Jennings Reporting" earned numerous awards, including the 2004 Edward R. Murrow Award for best documentary for "The Kennedy Assassination -- Beyond Conspiracy."

Jennings' last documentary "Peter Jennings Reporting: Breakdown -- America's Health Insurance Crisis," aired on ABC in December. Elizabeth Vargas and Bob Woodruff succeeded him as co-anchors of "World News Tonight" in January. Woodruff is recuperating from injuries he suffered from a bomb attack while reporting from Iraq last month.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; US: New York
KEYWORDS: abcnews; dhimmitude; liberalpatriots; nathanhale; nyc; peterjennings; wtfk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-57 next last

1 posted on 02/21/2006 1:09:45 PM PST by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9

And the street behind CBS where the dumpsters are will be named for Dan Rather ....


2 posted on 02/21/2006 1:11:17 PM PST by SkyDancer (" Ok, if it's global warming then what caused the Ice Age and what ended it?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Don't they know he was a smoker?


3 posted on 02/21/2006 1:12:28 PM PST by Crawdad (So the guy says to the doctor, "It hurts when I do this.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

They're going to rename West 66th "Jihad Street"...?


4 posted on 02/21/2006 1:13:11 PM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("It'sTime for Republicans to Start Toeing the Conservative Line, NOT the Other Way Around!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Castigating Republicans —
And the Voters Who Dare to Elect Them

The 1994 midterm elections gave Republicans a majority in both houses of Congress for the first time since the 1950s. Jennings reacted by demeaning the voters, casting the policies of the new Congress as destructive and mean-spirited, and commiserating with Bill Clinton about the public’s lack of regard for his liberal policies. He continued to rail against GOP policies, especially tax cuts, for years.

Spanking voters for electing conservatives: “Some thoughts on those angry voters. Ask parents of any two-year-old and they can tell you about those temper tantrums: the stomping feet, the rolling eyes, the screaming. It’s clear that the anger controls the child and not the other way around. It’s the job of the parent to teach the child to control the anger and channel it in a positive way. Imagine a nation full of uncontrolled two-year-old rage. The voters had a temper tantrum last week....Parenting and governing don’t have to be dirty words: the nation can’t be run by an angry two-year-old.”
— In his daily ABC Radio commentary, November 14, 1994, after Republicans won control of Congress.

Voters didn’t give Bill Clinton enough credit: “I’d like to start, if I may, with what I think you may think is a puzzlement. You’ve reduced the deficit. You’ve created jobs. Haiti hasn’t been an enormous problem. You’ve got a crime bill with your assault weapon ban in it. You got NAFTA, you got GATT, and 50 percent of the people don’t want you to run again. Where’s the disconnect there?”
“Here’s another one. In our poll today, the absolute critical items for Congress to address. Number one, cutting the deficit. Number two, health care reform. The two issues which were absolute priorities for two years, and you don’t get any credit for them?”
—Two questions to President Clinton, January 5, 1995 World News Tonight.

Only naive racists support welfare reform: “The welfare debate has been getting more intense, ever since President Reagan regularly vilified what he referred to as the ‘welfare queens.’ Attitudes about people on welfare are sometimes based more on myth than reality. Most welfare mothers have only one or two children. Most welfare mothers had their first child when they were adults, not teenagers. Most people on welfare are not black.”
— World News Tonight, January 12, 1995.

Republicans want to destroy the planet: “Next week on ABC’s World News Tonight, a series of reports about our environment which will tell you precisely what the new Congress has in mind: the most frontal assault on the environment in 25 years. Is this what the country wants?”
— Jennings in a promotion shown during This Week with David Brinkley, July 9, 1995.

“[Republicans] are engaged in the most dramatic overhaul — or assault, some would say — on environmental legislation in 25 years.”
— World News Tonight, July 12, 1995.

Much better to keep punishing success: “Well, it helps to know this about a flat tax. It’s a very radical notion, and it’s not nearly so simple as it sounds....It is supposed to encourage savings and investment because profits would be tax free. But will plumbers be hurt more than plutocrats?...Certainly the rich would do better than the middle class....No Western country has ever tried to make such a seismic shift. How big will a flat tax need to be to raise the money which the government needs to run the country?”
— World News Tonight, January 15, 1996, referring to Republican presidential candidate Steve Forbes’ plan for a single income tax rate.

Those intolerant Republicans: “We begin tonight with what you could call zero tolerance....Today by the time Mr. Dole spoke by satellite to his party delegates, who were already gathered in San Diego, all notions of tolerance on the subject of abortion had disappeared from the party’s platform.”
— World News Tonight, August 6, 1996.

“The right to abortion has never been an overwhelming issue for women at election time. But this fight within the Republican Party has many women questioning how far this party will go to limit their rights.”
— World News Tonight, August 13, 1996.

Tax cuts deprive government: “Mr. Bush believes in a universal tax cut, which would mean a very large chunk of money not available for government programs.”
— World News Tonight, October 4, 2000.

Ridiculing tax relief: “The President’s tax cut is beginning to show up. Will three extra dollars stimulate the national economy?”
— World News Tonight, July 8, 2003, referring to the estimated increase in one law librarian’s weekly paycheck.



Peter’s European Agenda

World News Tonight promoted liberal policy ideas in an ongoing feature segment called “American Agenda,” which was introduced shortly after the November 1988 election and continued until August 1996. When it came to health, education, and welfare, Jennings often rued that the United States was “lagging behind” the rest of the “industrialized world” in creating a palette of cradle-to-grave social services and employer mandates. The answer to any social problem was usually more taxes, more spending, and tighter rules to keep evil businesses from ripping off the public.

Let’s copy Sweden: “Tonight we have put the best child care system in the world on the American Agenda. That is to say, the system which is acknowledged to be the best outside the home. It’s in Sweden. The Swedish system is run and paid for by the Swedish government, something many Americans would like to see the U.S. government do as well.”
— World News Tonight, November 22, 1989.
Jennings lavished praise on Sweden's government-
controlled child care system.

Hungry kids vs. White House greed: “Twelve million American children who do not have enough to eat, who lack adequate health care, and who are behind in schools and being left behind in life. Much of our broadcast will be dedicated to that, which makes the major news in Washington today seem even more of a contrast. The President’s Chief of Staff, John Sununu, is at the center of attention again, having to do with his use of limousines and corporate jets.”
— World News Tonight, June 18, 1991.

Poverty is a national disaster: “When you get close to the poor, you recognize right away that very often the level of assistance which they get from government doesn’t lift them up to the legal poverty line, let alone above it, which seems to say your congressmen and your state legislators have failed to recognize that children and families in poverty are a national disaster. In your name, they often argue about other priorities and welfare cheats. Twelve million American children who cheat.”
— World News Tonight, June 20, 1991.

Let’s copy France: “On the American Agenda tonight, France. One of the things we have found with every subject we address on the Agenda...is how often there are lessons to be learned from other societies. It is one thing for the United States to spend less on children than almost any other country in the industrialized world. It is another to see what those countries get in return for their dollar, or in this case, their franc.”
— World News Tonight, December 3, 1991.

America is so backwards: “The United States has this unfortunate distinction: It is one of only two countries in the industrialized world, the other is South Africa, that does not guarantee basic health care for all its children. “
— World News Tonight, April 5, 1994.

Really, we have to be more like the Europeans: “Those who argue for universal coverage very often make the point that the U.S. is practically alone in the industrialized world without it. Thirty million people without health insurance in the U.S. — compare that to Europe and Japan....In the great debate over universal coverage, a good many Americans believe it comes down to choices between haves and have-nots.”
— World News Tonight, July 26, 1994.

Millions hate deregulation: “We begin tonight with something to think about later this evening. You’re at home or in the office or the car, and you go to make a phone call. What do you think the chances are that when you do, you’re going to be ripped off by the phone company? There are millions of complaints in this age of deregulation, millions. And it’s a big enough problem for Congress to take up tomorrow.”
— World News Tonight, April 23, 1998.

We’re the “least generous” in saddling employers with new mandates: “The U.S. is actually the least generous of the industrialized nations. In Sweden, a new mother gets 18 months of maternity and parental leave, and she gets 80 percent of her salary for the first year. Mother or father can take the parental leave any time until a child is eight. England gives 18 weeks maternity leave. For the first six weeks, a mother gets 90 percent of her salary from the government and $86 a week thereafter. German women get two months of fully paid leave after giving birth. The government and the company kick in, and either parent has the option of three full years in parental leave with some of their salary paid and their jobs protected.”
— World News Tonight, April 19, 2001.

Price controls for prescriptions, now: “The pharmaceutical industry’s products have saved and improved millions of lives, but overall, are we getting our money’s worth? We do not believe so....The rules by which this hugely profitable industry operates do not always serve consumers adequately, and nothing is going to happen – no matter how angry consumers get – unless the Congress and the President decide that the time has come. The country can do better.”
— Peter Jennings Reporting, “Bitter Medicine: Pills, Profit and the Public Health,” May 29, 2002.



Our Overfed Defense

Jennings’ generosity with other people’s money did not extend to the defense budget — especially in his analysis of the proposed national missile defense system.

Let’s reverse those budget totals: “And yet, Congresswoman Schneider, in 1989, fiscal 1989 as we say in America, the Environmental Protection Agency got 5.1 billion dollars and the Defense Department got 290 billion dollars. What’s that tell us about our priorities?”
— From ABC’s September 12, 1989 news special, Capital to Capital.

Don’t waste money on bombers: “But if America wanted to go back to the Moon, it would take three years to get ready again. It might cost $10 billion to send men to Mars, which by the way is what it cost to produce just four of the nine B-2 bombers that Congress wants and the Pentagon says it does not need.”
— World News Tonight, December 12, 1997.

Let’s not be optimists: “We’re going to take ‘A Closer Look’ tonight at the plans for an anti-missile defense system. The one that has never been proven to work and may never work.”
— World News Tonight, June 12, 2000.

There’s a fire in your e-mail: “There is a little skepticism in the air here today. Some cynicism, too. The government has an idea of how to spend $50 billion of your money. That’s BILLION. It will be spent on building a system to safeguard the national security – but by the government’s own assessment it will probably not be foolproof, it will unnerve America’s allies, and in the end it may cost considerably MORE than $50 billion. A more critical assessment is that this system can never be made to work, that it will torpedo the basis of all arms control arrangements, and that in any event, any terrorist or ‘rogue nation’ that means to wreak havoc on U.S. soil can do so in ways that this system will not prevent.”
— From the anchorman’s Jennings Journal e-mail to viewers, May 1, 2001.

A liberal disclaimer: “One other note. Critics often object to the animation in news reports because the animation usually has the systems working.”
— On World News Tonight, May 1, 2001, as ABC graphics showed how an anti-missile defense system would destroy incoming warheads.



Jennings’ Liberal Hero of the Week

From the mid-1980s through the mid-1990s, World News Tonight celebrated heroes each Friday — political leaders, athletes, actors and anonymous do-gooders — by naming them the “Person of the Week.” The MRC documented the bias of this regular ABC News feature in 1992 and again in 1994.

Feminism helps us all (except maybe the unborn): “And, so we choose Betty Friedan because she had the ability and the sensitivity to articulate the needs of women, which means that she did us all a favor.”
— World News Tonight’s “Person of the Week,” February 19, 1988.

Carter “renewed respect” for America: “The person we have chosen this week has continued his life with distinction, considerable grace, and with a very strong commitment to peace and justice....In the public’s mind, the scales were never balanced. [Former President Jimmy] Carter’s success in foreign affairs — peace between Egypt and Israel, renewed respect for the United States in Latin America — have always been outweighed in the public mind by the hostage crisis.”
— World News Tonight’s “Person of the Week,” May 12, 1989.

Marian Wright Edelman loves children: “[She’s] always on Congress’s back for coming up with too little money....From her point of view, as you hear, it is a matter of the whole country’s future. The children are fortunate to have such an advocate.”
— Making the head of the Children’s Defense Fund the “Person of the Week,” World News Tonight, March 29, 1991.

Blessed are the federal regulators: “This week we have chosen a man who has appeared on our radar many times, for many reasons, a man who makes an enormous difference because he takes his public service so seriously...It is always the children for David Kessler. Dr. Kessler was trained as a pediatrician...All of this has made David Kessler something of a folk hero. Sometimes in Washington they call him `Eliot Nessler,’ after Eliot Ness, who fought the mob during the ’30s...He conducts himself as the people’s guardian in matters of food and drugs with the utmost conviction.”
— Making the chairman of the Food and Drug Administration the “Person of the Week,” World News Tonight, June 24, 1994.



Still More of Jennings’s Liberal Heroes

Jennings did not confine his praise for liberals to Fridays, and his penchant for promoting liberal activists continued long after ABC cancelled its “Person of the Week” segment.

Courage to make you pay up: “When he entered the race nearly a year ago, he [Democratic presidential candidate Bruce Babbitt] had the courage to say that as President he would probably have to raise taxes. And he never recovered from his courage.”
— World News Tonight, February 18, 1988.

The fingers, the palms, even the thumb: “He’s become a little more disciplined, Bill Clinton, but you know he loves a crowd. And he has, don’t want to get carried away here, but he has the kind of hands that people respond to.”
— During ABC’s coverage of the Democratic National Convention, July 15, 1992.

Try to overlook Louis Farrakhan’s anti-Semitism and weirdness: “It would be astonishing if this public performance of Farrakhan were to end or even minimize the controversy which he inspires in the country as a whole, but it would be a terrible mistake not to recognize that here today, he inspired many people, and in a broader sense, as one participant after another has reaffirmed, this day, at this time and this place, really did mean unity over division.”
— Reporting on the so-called “Million Man March” for the October 16, 1995 World News Tonight.

Clinton surrounded himself with geniuses: “Good evening. The man who presided over the best economy in a generation is going back to private life. The Secretary of the Treasury, Bob Rubin, who said today that he really was resigning, has been described in such glowing terms that he’d begun to sound indispensable. All sorts of people today, including the President, have called him the best Treasury Secretary since Alexander Hamilton, who was the first Secretary in 1789 and did an enormous amount to put the United States on firm financial footing.”
— World News Tonight, May 12, 1999.

Bill’s indispensable life partner: “He’s leaving the greatest thing in his life, and you are about to meet the challenge of the biggest thing, certainly, in your political life. What if he needs you?”
— To First Lady and New York Senate candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton on Good Morning America, August 15, 2000.

Jimmy Carter’s greatness: “It was a great day for Jimmy Carter. The former President heard early this morning that he had won the Nobel Peace Prize. Mr. Carter was President from 1977 to 1981. He is the least popular President in the period after World War II. In the mid-1990s, on the other hand, he was occasionally introduced as the only man who has ever used the presidency as a stepping stone to greatness.”
— World News Tonight, October 11, 2002.



What Clinton Scandals?

Jennings routinely presented the many Clinton scandals as dastardly inconveniences that get in the way of American progress. He felt Bill Clinton’s pain when the joy of being President was ruined.

Dick Morris ruined Bill’s convention moment: “Here in Chicago, the President has been fine tuning, as they say, the speech he will be giving to this convention and to the country tonight, and he has a lot to be pleased about: A very upbeat convention, a very successful train trip here with rising poll numbers to accompany it, and a very important set of statistics about the economy today, which he will certainly point to as evidence that the country should re-elect him. And then along comes a nasty little scandal to take the edge off the good news, at least for one day.”
— On World News Tonight, August 29, 1996, referring to disclosure of the Clinton campaign adviser’s relationship with a prostitute.

Hearings into scandal aren’t a good use of resources: “When we come back, two investigations of fundraising abuse, two of them on Capitol Hill. Is it a waste of time and money?”
— World News Tonight, April 10, 1997.

The sooner they’re over, the better:
Linda Douglass: “It’s clear that many of the Senators now want to defuse the partisan warfare and get this whole messy issue behind them.”
Peter Jennings: “That will be a relief to the public.”
— World News Tonight, September 9, 1997.

Looking for an excuse to ignore Monicagate: “We know from just answering the phone around here that the amount of attention we are giving this story is, at the very least, debatable. We in the news [business]....are devoting major time and resources to these events, but have we been carried away, are we doing too much and are we not being fair?”
— On World News Tonight, January 23, 1998, just two days after the Monica Lewinsky story broke.

We’re the pro-Clinton clique: “Mandy, who do you think is now going to carry the water, briefly, for the anti-Clinton clique in the country or the anti-Clinton people in the country?”
— To Democratic consultant Mandy Grunwald on World News Tonight, April 1, 1998, after a judge dismissed Paula Jones’ sexual harassment suit against Clinton.

Clinton’s accuser is icky: “I certainly won’t go out of my way to say hi to her.”
— On Paula Jones’ presence at the annual White House Correspondents’ Association dinner, as quoted in the April 27, 1998 Washington Post.

Finding the heart of America: “Good evening. We begin tonight with the voice of the people heard from the Senate gallery today during yet another procedural vote at the President’s impeachment trial....’God almighty,’ the man said, ‘take the vote and get it over with.’ He was arrested, — that’s him in the beard, slightly balding, on the right. He may think it was worth it, speaking as he does for so many Americans, whether they believe the President should be convicted of perjury and obstruction of justice or not. The best that we can say tonight is they are getting there.”
— World News Tonight, February 4, 1999.

Another nightmare has ended:
Peter Jennings: “But just so that you don’t terrify people altogether, Jeffrey, this is going to be the last of the Senate impeachment trial this week, as far as we know.”
Jeffrey Toobin: “That’s right. This national nightmare is over. We’ll see if there’s another one.”
— ABC News live coverage of President Clinton’s impeachment trial, February 8, 1999.

Another Clinton moment ruined: “I gather that the Independent Counsel must have been hitting these people with a sledgehammer in the final days of the presidency....His critics will not be disappointed to see this happen, and his enemies too. Nonetheless, it’s a very sad, almost tragic way for the President to spend his last day in office.”
— During ABC’s live coverage of an announced deal between President Clinton and Independent Counsel Robert Ray, January 19, 2001.



Who’s Afraid of Communism?

Peter Jennings never seemed bothered by the threat to America from communism and Soviet expansionism. His philosophy seemed to match Strobe Talbott’s line in Time on January 1, 1990: “Gorbachev is helping the West by showing that the Soviet threat isn’t what it used to be — and what’s more, that it never was.” Instead, Jennings explained how communist countries could provide Americans with lessons in social advancement.

Castro’s communist success story: “Medical care was once for the privileged few. Today it is available to every Cuban and it is free. Some of Cuba’s health care is world class. In heart disease, for example, in brain surgery. Health and education are the revolution’s great success stories.”
— World News Tonight, April 3, 1989.

The KGB is more open than the CIA: “A brief report from the Soviet Union today to match the extraordinary times. Can you imagine five CIA agents answering the public’s questions during a live television show? Not likely. In the Soviet Union today, television viewers had the unheard of opportunity to ask questions of five KGB agents on a show broadcast live nationwide. Here’s one example. One listener asked, ‘Don’t we have too many secrets?’ ‘Yes,’ replied an agent, ‘and some stupid ones.’”
— World News Tonight, November 2, 1989.

The communists win again: “For the Bush administration and the Reagan administration before it, the [ABC News/Washington Post] poll hints at a simple truth: after years of trying to get rid of the Sandinistas, there is not much to show for their efforts.”
— World News Tonight, February 20, 1990, five days before the Sandinistas were voted out of power.

The Russian people really loved their dictator: “Suddenly, from about half the way across the square, I heard this, ‘Peter, Peter, come, I want you to meet some people.’ And he [Mikhail Gorbachev] plunged into this crowd and it was, again, impressionistic, right? But it was clear to me that in touching these people...it was clear that he wanted us to see that here were people who on a one-to-one basis really felt positively about him.”
— Nightline, July 29, 1991.

China isn’t communist anymore: “Various Chinese tell us today that the only people who think China is a communist country now live in Washington. Today in China, for many people, it is really about the pursuit of wealth.”
— World News Tonight, June 25, 1998.

Really, China isn’t communist: “Finally this evening, part history and part myth. It was 50 years ago this week that the People’s Republic of China came into being, Mao Tse-Tung its founding father. China’s going all out to celebrate the triumphs of the communist revolution and ignore its failures. And all the ceremony will also ignore the fact that China, today, is hardly a communist country.”
— World News Tonight, September 29, 1999.

Missing the old dictatorships: “It is probably hard for most Americans to imagine anyone feeling nostalgic about living behind the Wall. It may also be hard to imagine that anyone in the Western part of Germany would miss the Wall either. But miss it, some people do.”
— Introducing a Berlin Wall story on the November 9, 1999 World News Tonight.

The civilized solution is to send Elian back to Cuba: “Good evening. In Miami today, immigration officials met with the Miami relatives of Elian Gonzalez again, and once again the government has failed to get the kind of cooperation from the relatives that might allow the case of this young boy to end in a civilized manner that is best for him.”
— World News Tonight, March 28, 2000.

The "civilized" way to end the Elian Gonzalez stand-off, Jennings argued, was to send him back to the communists.

There’s no simple answer in choosing between the U.S. and Cuba: “Beyond the questions of custody, the Cuban-American community in Miami has always argued, almost every day in fact, that Elian Gonzalez would have a better life here in the United States than in Cuba. It’s been argued before, and there’s not a simple answer.”
— World News Tonight, April 12, 2000.

The Soviets were more silly than serious: “There are some of you, I’m sure, who remember the days when we in the West were afraid that the Soviet Union would outdo the West technologically. They had been first into space. The CIA was pretty impressed, remember? And then the Soviet Union fell apart and we discovered how far behind they really were — not that they weren’t trying....Ah, yes, we used to take the Soviet Union so seriously.”
— World News Tonight item about a failed Soviet plan to equip soldiers and police with jet-powered boots, July 7, 2000.

Mourning an American extremist: “We missed the death of a notable American this week, so we want to catch up. Gus Hall actually died on Friday. The son of a Minnesota miner became head of the U.S. Communist Party at the height of anti-communist McCarthyism in the late ’40s and ’50s. He spent eight years in prison and a lifetime in the political wilderness for his views here, but he was a dignitary in the Soviet Union. Even after his friends there abandoned the cause, Hall never wavered, and he was 90.”
— World News Tonight, October 17, 2000.
Jennings tribute to American communist radical Gus Hall, who "never wavered" in his beliefs.



Blame America First

After the September 11th terrorist attacks, all of the anchors gave viewers fair and even-handed coverage, but Jennings was the first to revert to liberal form: Adversarial coverage of U.S. actions and U.S. policies, and less judgmental coverage of tyrants and terrorists. During the war in Afghanistan, World News Tonight gave far more airtime than the other broadcast networks to Taliban claims of massive civilian casualties that Jennings and his team could not verify, and which ABC reporter Jim Wooten later commendably debunked as inflated enemy propaganda.

American food is just propaganda: “One other item about these food and medicine drops. They’re not popular with everyone. The international relief organization Doctors Without Borders, which won the Nobel Peace Prize for relief work, described it today as military propaganda designed to justify the bombing. The Bush administration points out it also has committed $300 million in other aid. It’s a question, ultimately, of getting it there.”
— World News Tonight, October 8, 2001.

Demanding immediate results: “The Secretary of Defense said today that those people who are questioning the effectiveness of the U.S. bombing campaign in Afghanistan are too impatient, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said much the same thing. The Pentagon is being pressed harder to be specific about what it has accomplished so far. The bombing campaign against the Taliban is now entering its fourth week, and the Taliban are still standing.”
— World News Tonight, October 29, 2001, two weeks before the Taliban fled the Afghan capital of Kabul.

“Insular” Americans need enlightening: “It isn’t just about campaigning against terrorism around the world. That’s just too simple. There are a lot of root causes for dissatisfaction around the world, and I think for the country to exercise real global leadership, when globalization in itself is kind of complicated, it’s not just American business or selling American culture around the world. I think it’s a very big challenge for a leader to get us all engaged in that because, you know, Americans are pretty insular people for the most part.”
— On CBS’s Late Show with David Letterman, December 21, 2001.



One Man’s Terrorist Is Another Man’s Freedom Fighter

Even as the U.S. fought a war against terrorism, Jennings went out of his way to hide the anti-American crimes of Hezbollah, a Palestinian independence group that killed more than 300 Americans in the 1980s with car bomb attacks against the U.S. embassy and Marine barracks in Beirut, Lebanon.

Touting a terrorist’s denials while concealing their crimes: “It is Hezbollah, which means ‘The Party of God,’ that gets credit for liberating Lebanon from the long Israeli occupation. Yesterday, I went to see its 38-year-old leader, Hassan Nasrallah. He is a popular member of the political establishment. The Bush administration says Hezbollah is a terrorist organization. ‘Hezbollah was proud to resist the Israeli occupation,’ he says. ‘We gave our lives. We are not terrorists.’”
— In a report from Beirut, Lebanon, for the March 27, 2002 World News Tonight.
Disguising Hezbollah's guilt, Jennings said only "a man" attacked the U.S. embassy and Marine barracks in 1983.

“Today [the site of the former American embassy in Lebanon] is an empty lot. This is where the U.S. experienced the first suicide bomber. In 1983 a man simply drove his truck to the front door and blew himself up. Sixty-three people died. Later that year, the Marine barracks here were destroyed in much the same way; 241 Marines died.”
— Later in the same report, failing to state that Hezbollah was responsible for both anti-American attacks.

Only the government’s opinion? “In North Carolina, two men went on trial for smuggling cigarettes to allegedly help the group Hezbollah in Lebanon, which the government calls a terrorist organization. Their lawyer says it will be extremely hard to find an impartial jury.”
— World News Tonight, May 20, 2002.



Opposition to Iraq

Jennings displayed an antagonistic attitude towards’ Bush’s Iraq policies for months prior to the actual start of the second Gulf War in March, 2003. Even after the rapid collapse of the Saddam Hussein’s dictatorship, Jennings — more than any other news anchor — highlighted setbacks and scolded the military for its mistakes, leading to at least one embarrassing retraction.

Beating the war drums: “Wherever you live in the world today, the sound of war drums being beaten in Washington has become unmistakable. With the first anniversary of the September 11th attacks behind us...the administration’s preoccupation with Saddam Hussein and weapons of mass destruction has rapidly become the number one issue in international affairs.”
— ABC’s live coverage of President Bush’s speech to the United Nations, September 12, 2002.

Unlike Republicans, Saddam funds the arts: “This week we were surprised to see several hundred artists and writers walking through the streets of Baghdad to say thank you to Saddam Hussein. He had just increased their monthly financial support. Cynical, you could argue with this particular time, but the state has always supported the arts, and some of the most creative people in the Arab world have always been Iraqis. And whatever they think about Saddam Hussein in the privacy of their homes, on this occasion they were praising his defense of the homeland in the face of American threats.”
— Reporting from Baghdad on World News Tonight, January 21, 2003.

Bush is spoiling for war: “The UN weapons inspectors go back to Baghdad this weekend. They have not been happy with Iraqi cooperation so far. We’ll see if the Iraqis do any better — and if that means anything to the Bush administration.”
— World News Tonight, February 7, 2003.

The U.N. can solve this: “So many people don’t understand why you shouldn’t let the inspections continue if they are accomplishing anything.”
“Most people think they’re doing a reasonably effective job at the moment.”
“Mr. Secretary, many people think that your dismissal again today of the inspection process is because your administration keeps moving the goal post, that it is not just about disarming Saddam Hussein. It is, as the President says, about getting rid of Saddam Hussein.”
— To Secretary of State Colin Powell in a World News Tonight interview, March 7, 2003.

Looking Forward to a Long War:
Pentagon reporter John McWethy: “As the U.S. begins to really squeeze Baghdad, U.S. intelligence sources are saying that some of Saddam Hussein’s toughest security forces are now apparently digging in, apparently willing to defend their city block by block. This could be, Peter, a long war.”
Peter Jennings: “As many people had anticipated.”
— World News Tonight, April 4, 2003.

A sad day for sculptors: “Saddam Hussein may have been, or may be, a vain man, but he has allowed himself to be sculpted heavy and thin, overweight and in shape, in every imaginable costume — both national, in historic terms, in Iraqi historic terms — in contemporary, in every imaginable uniform, on every noble horse. The sculpting of Saddam Hussein, which has been a growth industry for 20 years, may well be a dying art.”
— ABC’s live coverage of the fall of Baghdad, as a crowd of Iraqis toppled a Saddam statue, April 9, 2003.

Curious about Saddam’s sensitive side: “This is not, as you heard so many times today, the end of the war. But it is an occasion to wonder, as we sometimes do, did Saddam Hussein ever understand what people thought about him? Did he care? I’m Peter Jennings.”
— Concluding an ABC News special after the fall of Baghdad, April 9, 2003.

Oil-obsessed America neglected to save civilization: “The country has been a living archive of man’s earliest history, where real connections can be made between then and now, which is why the Pentagon is being so widely criticized for not protecting the history when it captured the capital city....The Pentagon has said, in reply, look, this is war, and stuff happens, the U.S. was fired on from the museum grounds. Not a satisfactory answer for people who say that if the U.S. managed to protect the Ministry of Oil, why not this repository of civilization? Why, they ask, is neglect forgivable?”
— World News Tonight, April 18, 2003.

On second thought: “The looting at the national museum may not have been as extensive as some people first reported. A Marine colonel who’s been investigating tells us today that hundreds of items have been recovered from smugglers, Iraqis have returned items they may have had for safekeeping, other pieces have been found in the rubble, and it turns out that many pieces were removed before the war. Twenty-seven so-called ‘significant pieces’ were stolen, some of them priceless, but those who said that more than 150,000 items were looted appear to be wrong.”
— World News Tonight, May 1, 2003.



Promoting anti-war protesters

When the far left would shout against U.S. military intervention — during both the first and second Gulf Wars — Jennings made sure anti-war protesters were presented as a credible, reasonable, patriotic opposition group, downplaying any extremism or anti-Americanism that emanated from them. Jennings portrayed those who dissented from the anti-war line as chilling opponents of free speech.

Pleading for understanding: “At every anti-war demonstration, they carry the flag high to make the point, they say, that American troops in the Gulf have their support. They object to the government policy that sent the troops there.”
— World News Tonight, February 7, 1991.

Won’t someone make the anti-war protesters’ case?
Peter Jennings: “I suppose it makes sense that the time for debating the war or the future of the campaign is completely over.”
Democratic Senator Joe Biden: “Completely over....”
Jennings: “Let me ask you this, then. There are still a large number of people in the country who are opposed to this, realize they cannot stand it, but look to members of the Democratic Party, particularly, to sort of be their port in a storm, their place to manifest their dissatisfaction. What happens to them at the moment?”
— Exchange during ABC’s live war coverage, March 20, 2003.

Marxism for dummies: “By the way, ‘No blood for oil,’ from many people who are opposed to the war is, is not complicated at all. They believe the United States wishes to occupy Iraq in the long term to have the oil. Just so we understand why they wear those little buttons, ‘No blood for oil.’”
— World News Tonight, March 20, 2003.

The right to free speech has been cancelled: “When we come back this evening, being against the war and in show business — and the people who want to punish you for that.”
— Previewing an upcoming segment on World News Tonight, April 16, 2003.



What Liberal Media Bias?

While Jennings has occasionally commented that conservatives have not received enough attention in the “objective” press, more often he has dismissed the claims of liberal media bias.

We have no axe to grind: “I think there is a mainstream media. CNN is mainstream media, and the main, ABC, CBS, NBC are mainstream media. And I think it’s just essentially to make the point that we are largely in the center without particular axes to grind, without ideologies which are represented in our daily coverage, at least certainly not on purpose.”
— On CNN’s Larry King Live, May 15, 2001.

We were very tough on Clinton: “We all have baggage, but one of the good things about journalists is that they recognize bias and work hard to keep it out of their coverage....You can have all sorts of people who voted for Bill Clinton, but the media gave Clinton one hell of a time. Now we hear a lot from people who complain that we don’t give George Bush as hard a time as we gave Bill Clinton.”
— As quoted in the Miami Herald, March 17, 2002.

George Stephanopoulos is scrupulously nonpartisan: “If there’s ever been a guy who’s come out of an administration, who has made a cleaner break, and proved himself as a journalist than George Stephanopoulos, I don’t know who it is.”
— Radio interview with Bill O’Reilly replayed on FNC’s The O’Reilly Factor, May 15, 2002.


5 posted on 02/21/2006 1:15:15 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
They're going to rename West 66th "Jihad Street"...?

No, I think they've settled on "Spinmaster Boulevard".

6 posted on 02/21/2006 1:15:32 PM PST by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle; SkyDancer

Say that reminds me. BJ is in Sydney today. Maybe they could look into renaming King's Cross (legalized brothel district) for him.


7 posted on 02/21/2006 1:16:14 PM PST by presidio9 ("Bird Flu" is the new Y2K Virus -Only without the inconvenient deadline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Who?


8 posted on 02/21/2006 1:17:07 PM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Famous victim of Big Tobacco's war against unsuspecting consumers.


9 posted on 02/21/2006 1:20:01 PM PST by presidio9 ("Bird Flu" is the new Y2K Virus -Only without the inconvenient deadline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Just to let non-NYers know: they don't rename streets - they simply put up a sign under the numbered street sign. It's an honorific.

Years ago they named 6th Avenue the "Avenue of the Americas," but no real NYer calls it that.


10 posted on 02/21/2006 1:20:17 PM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

We have a street and park in Vancouver that we could dedicate to Rather ...Pigeon Park and Hastings St.


11 posted on 02/21/2006 1:20:53 PM PST by kajingawd (I hate you, and that's sad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
I assume the right line will be permanently closed and only left turns will be allowed.
12 posted on 02/21/2006 1:21:01 PM PST by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
NYC street to be renamed in Peter Jennings' honor (West 66th St renamed for Canadian journalist)

FWIW, Jennings was an American just like Arnold Schwarzenegger is an American.
13 posted on 02/21/2006 1:21:08 PM PST by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Funny, I would have picked Lenin Prospect in Moscow (pre-1991) to rename "Peter Jennings Street." Much more appropriate choice.


14 posted on 02/21/2006 1:21:13 PM PST by FormerACLUmember (No program, no ideas, no clue: The democrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

I may have missed it, but the quote I remember is when that high school dropout said, "I know that everyday something is going to happen and I can tell the public what it means."


15 posted on 02/21/2006 1:21:30 PM PST by saminfl (,/i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Bush Basher Boulevard? Commie Court? Liberal Lane?


16 posted on 02/21/2006 1:21:42 PM PST by magslinger (Cry Havoc and let slip the yobos of war!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Maybe every street in Manhattan can be named for a liberal icon. Central Park can be Michael Moore Park (albeit that's putting a very round peg in a rectangular hole).

According to the book 1776, NYC was full of people who sympathized with the British during the War of Independence. Coincidence?

17 posted on 02/21/2006 1:22:24 PM PST by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: magslinger


There you go! LOL


18 posted on 02/21/2006 1:23:04 PM PST by onyx (IF ONLY 10% of Muslims are radical, that's still 120 MILLION who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

"Who?"

Jennings was a high school dropout that got famous working for the viet cong, russia, Iran, Hamas, and Saddam hussein.

He dated a muslim woman for a while (Jordanian?) and really hated Israel.


19 posted on 02/21/2006 1:24:13 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I think it's going to be called, "Journalist in the Grass Way".


20 posted on 02/21/2006 1:25:30 PM PST by DoughtyOne (If you don't want to be lumped in with those who commit violence in your name, take steps to end it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I guess @ss Wipe Stree was already taken.


21 posted on 02/21/2006 1:26:38 PM PST by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

I used to work for a company that was headquartered on Avenue of the Americas (right between Fox News and CNN). It was always referred to the Avenue of the Americas office, not 6th Avenue.

But I get what you're saying. I always say 6th (because it's shorter, not because I buy into NYC native snobbiness).


22 posted on 02/21/2006 1:27:58 PM PST by presidio9 ("Bird Flu" is the new Y2K Virus -Only without the inconvenient deadline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
West 66th Street between Central Park West and Columbus Avenue in New York City's Upper West Side will be dubbed "Peter Jennings Way."

isn't that at the cross section of Lying Liberal Puke Blvd?

23 posted on 02/21/2006 1:31:28 PM PST by Bommer (Have you insulted a prophet today? http://pages.sbcglobal.net/bommer/mofactor.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

That or "Bakalakalaka St."


24 posted on 02/21/2006 1:33:30 PM PST by SAMS (Nobody loves a soldier until the enemy is at the gate; Army Wife & Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert56
According to the book 1776, NYC was full of people who sympathized with the British during the War of Independence. Coincidence?

I live in NYC, and I have no interest in defending the liberal stupidity that goes on here. That being said, I read 1776, and I didn't come away with the idea that NY had more or less loyalists. It had some, and they were treated harshly by the Washington's forces that occupied Manhattan in 1776. It had more rebels, or the Army would have left. Every part of this country had its fair share of loyalists (just as today, there are people in all parts who think the war against terrorism is "illegal.") The bulk of the Revolutionary War was fought in and around NYC, which makes it likely that NY was disproportionately represented in the Continental Army.

25 posted on 02/21/2006 1:34:57 PM PST by presidio9 ("Bird Flu" is the new Y2K Virus -Only without the inconvenient deadline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert56
According to the book 1776, NYC was full of people who sympathized with the British during the War of Independence. Coincidence?

I live in NYC, and I have no interest in defending the liberal stupidity that goes on here. That being said, I read 1776, and I didn't come away with the idea that NY had more or less loyalists. It had some, and they were treated harshly by the Washington's forces that occupied Manhattan in 1776. It had more rebels, or the Army would have left. Every part of this country had its fair share of loyalists (just as today, there are people in all parts who think the war against terrorism is "illegal.") The bulk of the Revolutionary War was fought in and around NYC, which makes it likely that NY was disproportionately represented in the Continental Army.

26 posted on 02/21/2006 1:34:58 PM PST by presidio9 ("Bird Flu" is the new Y2K Virus -Only without the inconvenient deadline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Does this street run one way....to the left???


27 posted on 02/21/2006 1:35:45 PM PST by Onelifetogive (* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

One of my favorites is Senor Wences Way, over by The Ed Sullivan Theater. He contributed a lot more to the quality of life in the US than Jennings ever did. If memory serves, there is even an "Israeli War Bonds Way" not far from the UN, ironically enough.


28 posted on 02/21/2006 1:37:20 PM PST by speedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive

66th street is one way and heading west. So yes.


29 posted on 02/21/2006 1:37:56 PM PST by presidio9 ("Bird Flu" is the new Y2K Virus -Only without the inconvenient deadline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
It is a permanent geographical memorial to the man who left such an indelible mark on the landscape of American journalism.

He did? Who knew?

30 posted on 02/21/2006 1:41:12 PM PST by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9


Will Canada be renaming any streets, after all, Jennings was a canuck!


31 posted on 02/21/2006 1:41:46 PM PST by rockabyebaby (I'm not afraid to say out loud what the rest of you are afraid to admit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I may have to go walk my dog on west 66th stW


32 posted on 02/21/2006 1:46:32 PM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crawdad; SkyDancer; KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle; MeanWestTexan; randog; BenLurkin; ...

All of you may be interested in knowing this: The area to be named for American Patriot Peter Jennings is the same spot where Nathan Hale was hanged. Liberals suck. WTF?

33 posted on 02/21/2006 1:48:58 PM PST by presidio9 ("Bird Flu" is the new Y2K Virus -Only without the inconvenient deadline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
I may have to go walk my dog on west 66th stW

Please don't do that before you see post 33.

34 posted on 02/21/2006 1:49:50 PM PST by presidio9 ("Bird Flu" is the new Y2K Virus -Only without the inconvenient deadline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

Thanks for that recap. I remember Jennings interviewing Hannan Ashrawi after Septmeber 11th. Well, it really wasn't an interview, he just let her rant for a few minutes. Good Night and Good Luck Peter!


35 posted on 02/21/2006 1:53:04 PM PST by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rockabyebaby

FWIW, Jennings became an American citizen in 2003.


36 posted on 02/21/2006 1:54:05 PM PST by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA


So? He spent most of his life as a Canadian citizen, so the question is still on the board, will Canada be renaming any streets.......


37 posted on 02/21/2006 1:56:59 PM PST by rockabyebaby (I'm not afraid to say out loud what the rest of you are afraid to admit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

link keeps getting removed

38 posted on 02/21/2006 1:57:25 PM PST by presidio9 ("Bird Flu" is the new Y2K Virus -Only without the inconvenient deadline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

RATher wants 16th street named after him, but he still can't figure out the small "th" stuff.......DOH!!

39 posted on 02/21/2006 1:59:22 PM PST by Doogle (USAF...8thAF...4077th TFW...408th MMS...Ubon Thailand..."69"..Night Line Delivery,AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

A big fan of 60's radio, I used to listen to the big AM 50,000 watt monsters and loved WABC. Peter Jennings was a newsman there early. But the night jock, Cousin Brucie Morrow, has a piece of 6th Avenue named for him in (I believe between 51st and 52nd St.). It's Cousin Brucie Way.
The next President of the United States had it named for him in the 90's.


40 posted on 02/21/2006 2:04:50 PM PST by bombthrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Doogle
NY Historical Society: Nathan Hale
41 posted on 02/21/2006 2:05:17 PM PST by presidio9 ("Bird Flu" is the new Y2K Virus -Only without the inconvenient deadline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: bombthrower

Hillary has a better chance of ever beomong president than Rudy.


42 posted on 02/21/2006 2:06:27 PM PST by presidio9 ("Bird Flu" is the new Y2K Virus -Only without the inconvenient deadline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Oh yea, I remember reading that too! That sucks ....


43 posted on 02/21/2006 2:08:26 PM PST by SkyDancer (" Ok, if it's global warming then what caused the Ice Age and what ended it?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

I just find in nauseating that liberals would not take the time to learn this before blithely elevating one of their own to sainthood for self-imposed lung cancer. In 230 years, nobody ever had the audacity to suggest that the street be named for a 22 year-old man who regretted only that he had but one life to give for his country. I can't tell you how much this stinks of what is wrong with liberals and how pissed off I am by this.


44 posted on 02/21/2006 2:12:29 PM PST by presidio9 ("Bird Flu" is the new Y2K Virus -Only without the inconvenient deadline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
Hitler left an indelible mark on European politics, but I haven't heard of anyone naming streets after him. Outside Iran, that is.
45 posted on 02/21/2006 2:13:34 PM PST by magslinger (Cry Havoc and let slip the yobos of war!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

NYC street to be renamed in Peter Jennings' honor (West 66th St renamed for Canadian journalist)

Ah, That sounds like NYC - "Peter street".


46 posted on 02/21/2006 2:19:57 PM PST by chainsaw ( ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - H. Clinton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Well, not the exact same spot. The part named after Jennings is on the West Side, and the Nathan Hale site is on the East Side. So at least there is a mile or so cordon sanitaire between the Hero and the Commie.


47 posted on 02/21/2006 2:26:37 PM PST by speedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: speedy

Close enough. My point is that I am still waiting for the upswelling calling for part of 66th st to be renamed for Hale. I won't hold my breath.


48 posted on 02/21/2006 2:32:19 PM PST by presidio9 ("Bird Flu" is the new Y2K Virus -Only without the inconvenient deadline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: speedy

And, actually, now that I think about it, 3rd Ave & Central Park West can't be more than 1/2 mile apart.


49 posted on 02/21/2006 2:36:06 PM PST by presidio9 ("Bird Flu" is the new Y2K Virus -Only without the inconvenient deadline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"Will three extra dollars stimulate the national economy?"

Will three extra dollars improve education or get the poor a job?
50 posted on 02/21/2006 2:46:23 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson