Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE PORT DEAL - THIS COULD BE BUSH'S FIRST VETO? HE'S JOKING, RIGHT?
Nealz Nuze ^ | 22 February 2006 | Neal Boortz

Posted on 02/22/2006 6:31:33 AM PST by rattrap

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-190 next last
To: Echo Talon
China runs ports in California and they have nukes, maybe you should have those ports shut down?

As I recall, there was a lot of FRoutrage over China getting control of those ports as well.

61 posted on 02/22/2006 7:05:58 AM PST by dirtboy (I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rattrap

I've been a vocal Bushie here at FR.

This one has me stumped! (as well as a couple others.)

What is the Prez thinking?


62 posted on 02/22/2006 7:06:31 AM PST by colorcountry (.....he has mercy upon whom he wills, and he hardens whom he wills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SquirrelKing

LOL


63 posted on 02/22/2006 7:06:48 AM PST by OKIEDOC (There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

I've been listening to the debate on every network. The deal stinks. For Bush to stake his Presidency on this by playing the veto card is nuts. What an insult to his supporters.


64 posted on 02/22/2006 7:06:53 AM PST by veronica ("A person needs a sense of mission like the air he breathes...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rattrap

"So this is where George Bush wants to use his first veto? "



No kidding. Of all the things he should have fought for on behalf of We the People and used his veto power, he fights for a foreign interest.


65 posted on 02/22/2006 7:07:15 AM PST by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

I dont know, it must have been before I was a member here, I dont remember hearing anything about it in the news.


66 posted on 02/22/2006 7:07:40 AM PST by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: rattrap

If thsi was Clinton doing this people would be screaming not supporting the idea.


67 posted on 02/22/2006 7:07:48 AM PST by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TShaunK
Other rumors say some threatened Bush with turning off the oil spigot.

"Turning off the oil spigot" would have been impractical, if not impossible. More likely, what they would do is stop selling oil in U.S. dollars and start pricing it in euros instead.

And who could possibly blame them? They can't eat dollars, so when they sell oil to us they have to use those dollars to buy/invest in assets that are priced in dollars (U.S. government securities, U.S. real estate, etc.). If the U.S. government impedes them from buying legitimate, profitable business interests in the U.S., then our currency isn't worth a damn thing to them.

68 posted on 02/22/2006 7:08:57 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Leave a message with the rain . . . you can find me where the wind blows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: evets
Are we viewing the world through BS colored glasses?

69 posted on 02/22/2006 7:09:32 AM PST by mnehring (Perry 06- It's better than a hippie in a cowboy hat or a commie with blue hair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: SquirrelKing

Is that supposed to be funny? How childish.


70 posted on 02/22/2006 7:09:53 AM PST by dc-zoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: vernvet

ok, they send day to day operations of their ports. Is it worth losing them as an ally? I think thats what people are forgetting, this country allows us to have AIR Bases on their soil. They also share intel with us.


71 posted on 02/22/2006 7:10:49 AM PST by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: DC Ripper

I want the borders closed, and I'll vote that way,
but it will never happen, unless states do it individually.
I think the ports are a different issue, but I'm listening.


72 posted on 02/22/2006 7:11:03 AM PST by evets (God bless president Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: rattrap

For those who claim that UAE has been a good friend in the GWOT, remember this:

UAE was one of only 3 govt's to recognize the Taliban as a legitimate gov't.

UAE was also a key shipping point of nuclear weapons components transportation for the whole A.Q.Khan fiasco.


73 posted on 02/22/2006 7:11:36 AM PST by Blzbba (Sub sole nihil novi est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
Our side has joined the irrational emotional side on this issue.

They were so quick to jump on the band wagon and I believe they will come to regret it. When the story first surfaced, Schumer and the media blew it out of proportion without all the facts (as usual). The Coast Guard is still running the show when it comes to security on U.S. waters.

74 posted on 02/22/2006 7:12:02 AM PST by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

My bad, Lippo is from Indonesia and it's Pauline Kanchanalak, not Elaine. She has ties to Singapore businesses but was born in Thailand.


75 posted on 02/22/2006 7:12:03 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: vernvet
They will have a office at the port. That office will have computers. Those computers can e-maill photo's of the ports day to day operations.

Wait a second-- are you saying that if we have crazy Hilary write a bunch of goofy laws screwing up DPW's buying out P&O, then some how terrorists will not be able to own computers and have offices overlooking ports?

76 posted on 02/22/2006 7:12:13 AM PST by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: rattrap
The Pres has very successfully convinced a great majority that we have much to fear from terrorists (who just happen to be Islamists). Everytime he wants to up his poll numbers or garner votes, some OBL tape surfaces and we all (rightly so) become concerned about our national security.

So now he expects us to just say, Oh sure, the pres says it's ok for the Islamist to become intimately involved in the operations of our ports -hey, no problem !!!

Sort of like Princess Diana hating the stalking press but using them when she needed to.

Sorry George, you can't have it both ways.
77 posted on 02/22/2006 7:12:17 AM PST by Mayflower Sister (DEMOCRAT: THE PARTY OF COWARDS AND TRAITORS, and I almost forgot... BABY KILLERS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vernvet
Here's a message I posted on this subject yesterday . . .

I'm guessing a lot of people here on FR aren't aware of this, but container ports are open-air facilities where all cargo activity -- both on the ship and on the pier -- takes place outside. With a group of three or four people I could do the following (starting this afternoon):

1. Identify a container ship entering the Port of New York and New Jersey.

2. Identify the exact time of berthing at one of the seven terminals in the port.

3. Visually select a few random containers on the vessel. Identify the exact time when each of these containers was unloaded from the ship.

4. Identify the exact location on the pier where each container was placed.

5. Identify the date and exact time when each of these containers is picked up by the consignee.

6. Identify the warehouse or distribution center where each container is taken, the routes taken to get them there, and the exact time they arrived at each location.

Now I wish someone would please tell me this . . . from a national security standpoint, what kind of information could someone possibly want that is worth paying $6.8 billion to acquire?

78 posted on 02/22/2006 7:12:32 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Leave a message with the rain . . . you can find me where the wind blows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
Ha ha! I'll drink to that!

79 posted on 02/22/2006 7:13:57 AM PST by evets (God bless president Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: rattrap

I wonder if Dubya struck a deal with Dubai to build an air or naval base there? After all, it is just a hop, skip and jump across the Strait to Iran. Has he already got the invasion of Iran planned?


80 posted on 02/22/2006 7:14:06 AM PST by biff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson