Posted on 02/23/2006 1:15:14 PM PST by knighthawk
Holocaust denier deserves to be ignored, not thrown in prison
Last winter, on a cold and black night, I went to hear the Holocaust denier David Irving speak at the University of Colorado. I arrived early to get a good seat and soon after me came five huge young men, all of them looking like skinheads. I glared at them, and they glared at me and for a moment I feared I was going to meet my maker. But it turned out that when Irving started to speak, the skinheads of my fertile imagination rose as one, unfurled an Israeli flag and announced themselves as Jewish protesters.
Had it not been for those protesters, a handful of the curious and me, Irving could have held his lecture in a nearby broom closet. He is a man of justifiably small following, a claque of bigots so addled by Jew-hatred that they cannot see the evidence before their own eyes. The many pictures, the films, the artifacts, the testimony of victims and perpetrators alike is to them proof of a different kind: the ability of Jews to hoodwink the world. It never happened. The Holocaust is a lie.
Now Irving has admitted the lie is his. There were gas chambers at Auschwitz, he now admits. The Jews there did not die of disease, but were murdered outright and fed into the ovens. This confession of truth was extracted by a dilemma. Irving was facing jail time in Austria for the crime of denying the Holocaust. His penitence got him very little. A judge hit him with a three-year sentence.
A little delicious satisfaction is allowed. Irving is a liar. He is an anti-Semite. He has squandered his considerable gifts at dreary research for the glad rags of demagoguery. He had a Web page. He gave lectures. He sued and was sued. He picked the pockets of the gullible. Years ago, he mistook justifiable criticism by some Jews as an attack by an entire people. This is the odd talent of the anti-Semite: to see all by seeing one.
Still, it is troubling to fight fire with fire - a fascist mentality with fascist laws. At the very heart of totalitarianism is an absolute fear of dissent. Anti-Semitism is an idea - a bad one, an odious one, but one all the same. The current Austrian government enforces a law against Holocaust denial that is an attempt to ensure that the old days do not return, but it is always a bad idea to have such legislation on the books. It is a precedent others can abuse.
Article 48 of Germany's pre-Nazi Weimar constitution allowed the president to rule by decree in times of emergency. The law was abused in the Weimar era and then, of course, by Hitler. It got him on his feet as a dictator. The remarkable thing about bad laws is their plasticity: anyone can bend them to their needs.
Germany, France and other European countries also have laws regarding Holocaust denial. These are some of the same countries who hold Turkey in sneering contempt for its law forbidding any insult to "Turkishness" - specifically references to the massacre of Armenians during World War I and the more recent trouble with the Kurds. To many Europeans, this is proof of Turkey's alien ways and a reason it should not be admitted into the European Union. It does not occur to many Europeans that Turkey is merely protecting its version of history as Austria and the others protect theirs. Truth, of course, matters - but what also matters, critically if not paramountly, is the effort to impose it by government fiat.
It is easy enough to dismiss Irving and say he doesn't matter. But what makes him dangerous is not his ideas, but the official, censorious, response to them. He is muscled up solely by virtue of the forces arrayed against him. These governments, particularly Austria, have transformed the imbecilic into something exotically taboo. By banning these ideas, the various European governments accord them a certain respect: See, why are they afraid of us? It must be because what we say is true.
Let Irving howl his idiocy in freedom. He doesn't deserve to be jailed. He deserves to be ignored.
Ping
A leftie standing up for freedom of expression? A rare thing nowadays indeed.
"A leftie standing up for freedom of expression? A rare thing nowadays indeed."
____________________________
I too was shocked that I agreed with Cohen on this issue.
What Irving needs is a good dose of being caricatured....that'll teach him...:)
He is all wrong.
The law was not abused. The problem was that there was a large bloc of Communist totalitarians in the Reichstag and a growing bloc of Nazi totalitarians as well.
The Reichstag was unable to proceed normally because bloc voting paralyzed all legislative intiatives by the government. Article 48 was repeatedly invoked in order to break obstructionist deadlocks by Communists and Nazis.
Each time Article 48 was invoked, the law required that each Presidential decree be ratified by a bare majority of the Reichstag. Basically Article 48 was invoked in order to force a vote, not to play dictator.
Hitler used the Reichstag Fire as an excuse to make the President invoke Article 48, but Article 48 is not what allowed the fiend to seize power. It was the Enabling Act in which the Reichstag transferred greater executive authority to the Cabinet, which Hitler as Chancellor controlled.
Hitler used the increased powers granted the Cabinet by the Reichstag's Enabling Act, not Article 48 - Article 48 gave the president more executive power not the Chancellor.
Was the law he was convicted under, an amendment to free speech? Does that law exist in this country?
Hate em back it keeps you warm....
This case was brought in Austria, not this country. Our laws are irrelevant to this story.
What is freedom of expression? Without the freedom to offend, it ceases to exist."
Salman RUSHDIE
"If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear."
George ORWELL
I have always been among those who believed that the greatest freedom of speech was the greatest safety, because if a man is a fool the best thing to do is to encourage him to advertise the fact by speaking."
Woodrow WILSON
Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves.
Abraham Lincoln
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.