Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should the U.S. build nuclear power plants to decrease its reliance on foreign oil?
C-Spann ^ | 23 Feb 2006 | Capitol News

Posted on 02/23/2006 1:38:50 PM PST by AmericanDave

Should the U.S. build nuclear power plants to decrease its reliance on foreign oil?

Poll vote now! http://www.capitalnews.org./


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: engery; oil; poll; power
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last
Suprisingly going 60 pro Nuclear Power.... The China syndrome has worn off!
1 posted on 02/23/2006 1:38:53 PM PST by AmericanDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AmericanDave

Not only yes, but HELL YES!!!!


2 posted on 02/23/2006 1:39:16 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I think France is HUGE in Nuclear power.... but where do they put their spent fuel?


3 posted on 02/23/2006 1:40:22 PM PST by AmericanDave (More COWBELL....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AmericanDave

Absolutemundo!


4 posted on 02/23/2006 1:41:10 PM PST by sangoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanDave

Is this a serious question !? Dammit, I want one of these slick new pebble-bed reactors in my basement powering my house. And a new carbon nanotube ultralight battery powered electric muscle car.

HELL yea. We got plenty enriched uranium.


5 posted on 02/23/2006 1:41:39 PM PST by farlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanDave
First you change the lightbulbs.

Flouresecent bulbs to replace incandescent bulbs and RF Flouresecent Light fixtures to replace "old style flourescent fixtures. With 24% of electrical energy used for lighting this could create Jobs, Wealth and Reduce Pollution. All in Aisle 3 at Home Depot!!!!

6 posted on 02/23/2006 1:41:53 PM PST by Young Werther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Young Werther
All in Aisle 3 at Home Depot!!!! Or dare I say: Walmart!
7 posted on 02/23/2006 1:43:38 PM PST by AmericanDave (More COWBELL....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AmericanDave

They reprocess it to make more fuel.
When fuel is "spent", about 60% of the U235 is still in it.


8 posted on 02/23/2006 1:43:52 PM PST by wolfpat (Dum vivimus, vivamus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AmericanDave

Russia


9 posted on 02/23/2006 1:43:58 PM PST by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AmericanDave
YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
10 posted on 02/23/2006 1:44:05 PM PST by Red Badger (And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Young Werther

go to www.ccrane.com they have led light bulbs..very expensive but will last 6 years if they are left on 24/7 and will only use $1.00 per year of electricity.


11 posted on 02/23/2006 1:44:12 PM PST by cajun-jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AmericanDave
. but where do they put their spent fuel?

Spent fuel is easily stored and managed on site.
12 posted on 02/23/2006 1:44:25 PM PST by yobid (What we have here is a failure to communicate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

There ya go! I'll agree with that!


13 posted on 02/23/2006 1:44:29 PM PST by CyberAnt (Democrats/Old Media: "controversy, crap and confusion" -- Amen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AmericanDave

In a brilliant bit of engineering design I responded yesterday to an ethanol thread where the topic of energy to produce was raised.

The nuclear heated steam driving the generating turbines can be diverted into an ethanol distillation column to provide the energy required to boil off the ethanol.

This heat will be essentially free if charged to the electricity generation.


14 posted on 02/23/2006 1:44:50 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. Slay Pinch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanDave

Abso-friggin-lutely!


15 posted on 02/23/2006 1:44:53 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfpat

How come we were allways told Yucca Mountain? If you can recycle it.


16 posted on 02/23/2006 1:45:41 PM PST by AmericanDave (More COWBELL....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AmericanDave

Now that's a poll question worth answering. And I did. 929 votes, 63% Yes, 37% No.


17 posted on 02/23/2006 1:45:47 PM PST by American Quilter (The greater man, the greater courtesy. - Alfred, Lord Tennyson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Question #2 is mine... http://www.whitehouse.gov/ask/20060221.html

Todd, from Gilroy, CA writes:
I am a big fan of nuclear power. Unfortunately, most folks remember Three Mile Island and Chernobyl. Technology is much better now and nuclear would be a great way to reduce dependence on fossil fuels. Is it reasonable to expect an expansion of nuclear power in the US?

Samuel Bodman
You’re right and I think it’s very reasonable to expect an expansion of nuclear power in the United States and, frankly around the world.

Part of the challenge we face is how to meet the future demands for energy in a safe and environmentally friendly way. Nuclear power is clean, safe and has too many benefits for us not to change our thinking from the Three Mile Island mindset you referenced. As the president said in Milwaukee Monday, “We ought to start building nuclear power plants again.” France depends on nuclear power for most of its electricity; China has eight nuclear plants under construction and plans to build at least 40 more over the next two decades.

To encourage construction of new plants, the Administration has put forward several new initiatives including federal risk insurance for the first six new plants and a $1.1 billion partnership between government and industry – the Nuclear Power 2010 Initiative – to facilitate new plant orders. The point is that we can no longer wait to tap the resources that are available to us today if we are going to reduce our dependence on foreign sources of energy.

Additionally, we have proposed a new initiative called the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership to encourage the expansion of nuclear power around the world while reducing the risk that nuclear technology and material will fall into the wrong hands. You can learn more about at www.gnep.energy.gov.


18 posted on 02/23/2006 1:46:05 PM PST by Rio (Don't make me come over there....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Young Werther
I DETEST fluorescent lamp bulbs.

Their light is not of the same quality as incandescent bulbs, and fluorescent bulbs dim with age.

When they perfect the damned things, I'll give 'em another look.
19 posted on 02/23/2006 1:46:09 PM PST by Pete'sWife (Dirt is for racing... asphalt is for getting there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AmericanDave
straight!
20 posted on 02/23/2006 1:46:27 PM PST by OB1kNOb ("All you get from our media is controversy, crap and confusion.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson